Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Watch: Has Will Greenwood revolutionised rugby with 'unmissable' drop kick?

Will Greenwood's adaptation of the drop kick. Photo / Twitter.

Former World Cup-winning England and British and Irish Lions midfielder Will Greenwood may have just set a new drop kicking trend.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 46-year-old has developed a new technique to execute the drop kick, a technique of which he described as “unmissable” on Twitter.

In similar fashion to an American football-style field goal, Greenwood’s adaptation of the kick sees a teammate drop the ball onto the ground in a backward motion as the kicker lines up the ball from a metre or two behind before launching it towards the posts.

Greenwood claims the drop goal is legal as long as the player dropping the ball ensures that the ball is being dropped backwards, meaning a knock on cannot be called.

Greenwood was part of the England side that claimed the 2003 World Cup title via a last-minute Jonny Wilkinson drop goal during extra time in the final against hosts Australia.

The scoring mechanism has traditionally been used as a vital way of securing victory in the knockout stages of previous World Cups.

Six drop goals have been scored in the previous eight World Cup finals, with Dan Carter the most recent to successfully convert one during the All Blacks‘ 34-17 win over Australia in 2015.

ADVERTISEMENT

Many expect this year’s World Cup in Japan to be one of the most competitive tournaments ever given the recent success of the likes of New Zealand, Ireland, England, South Africa and Wales.

With that in mind, the next world champion could again be determined by a drop goal, and Greenwood might have just invented the way in which the next title-winning  drop goal could be slotted in Yokohama on November 2.

Rugby World Cup Japan City Guide – Oita:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 2 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Alex Mitchell: Saints 'are in a very good place at the moment' Alex Mitchell: Saints 'are in a very good place at the moment'
Search