Northern | US

Wallabies’ second-half fades reveal a pathway to victory in Perth

Fraser McReight of Australia celebrates scoring his team's second try during the Nations Championship match between the Wallabies and France. (Photo by Graham Denholm/Nations Championship via Getty Images)
Comments
19 Comments

You will have heard plenty of rugby coaches talk of the “controllables” and how you must control the things you can and not worry about the things you cannot.

ADVERTISEMENT

This seemingly obvious adage is very helpful in understanding the Wallabies in the past few weeks, particularly for understanding the second-half capitulations.

While identifying that “second-half fades” are the problem is a good initial step, much more forensic work must be done to understand these woes and know how to fix them.

VIDEO

In Sydney, the Wallabies lost that second half to Ireland because they had very little ball or territory due to their reserves coming on and conceding far too many penalties and a yellow card.

In Brisbane, Wallabies coach Joe Schmidt selected a rookie flyhalf backed up by a fullback who was forced into the playmaking role despite not being ready for it.

The Wallabies lost at Suncorp to France because, despite having both possession and some territory, they had no direction due to their dire flyhalf selection strategy.

You can’t do something in an attack without the ball or without territory, no matter who you have in the flyhalf role, as was the case in Sydney.

ADVERTISEMENT

You can’t breach a French defensive line and alleviate pressure if you play directionless rugby and spend all your energy in between your own 22m and the opposition’s 40m, as was the case in Brisbane.

While neither of these explanations is expected to blow your mind, it is a case of being objective about why the Wallabies lost and understanding how the problem eventuated and how it can be fixed.

Had Schmidt picked an experienced No.10 in Brisbane, then the Wallabies would have had more territory, and the French would have had to work harder to get into the Wallabies’ half because they conceded only 5 penalties for the entire match.

Head-to-Head

Last 5 Meetings

Wins
3
Draws
0
Wins
2
Average Points scored
34
20
First try wins
80%
Home team wins
80%

Against Ireland, in Sydney, the Wallabies conceded 12, a bulk of them coming in the second half, and a quarter coming from the bench, as well as a yellow card.

ADVERTISEMENT

In just one week, they fixed their discipline. 

Schmidt noted they had brought in a referee in the lead-up to the Brisbane game and asked them to penalise the Wallabies for the slightest infringement, which seemed to have worked.

Unfortunately, the “controllable” of selection is what caught the Wallabies napping in Brisbane, as it was so evident that the Wallabies were directionless with their inexperienced playmakers unfairly thrust into the pivotal flyhalf role.

This has now been remedied with the selection of Ben Donaldson on the bench, the Wallabies’ most experienced flyhalf in the squad.

Although having different issues each week is far from ideal, it is better that the latter issue is a controllable one, rather than not.

Ahead of the Italy showdown in Perth, the Wallabies must take stock and back the good, the controllables, before worrying about fixing the things that are out of their control.

For instance, their scrum is operating at a 100 per cent success rate, and their lineout is only a few percentage points behind that over both the Ireland and France games.

An almost unchanged pack for the Italy game will certainly help these stats to continue.

These set-piece numbers alone are nothing to scoff at, and after having played the two best sides in the northern hemisphere, the Wallabies should be confident they can dominate these areas in Perth.

They are just a couple of stats that show just how much heavy lifting the forward pack is doing in these performances.

Related

Another controllable, albeit slightly less within the Wallabies’ power, is their discipline; nevertheless, they have now shown, as mentioned above, that they can keep a low penalty count.

Many will question the disciplinary record of potential debutant Miles Amatosero, the hulking lock from the Waratahs who’s been named on the bench, but that is a controllable.

Where Amatosero will aid the Wallabies, should he get on, is the gainline and physicality battle. His 125kg will certainly help in the set piece and in the defensive line.

Another positive the Wallabies should take stock of is that once they get into the opposition’s 22m, although it may take more phases than others, they manage to walk away with points most of the time.

Acknowledging this puts a premium on territory and the kicking game, and puts the spotlight on Donaldson off the bench.

Donaldson will come off the bench in a bid to channel the verve and vigour of the other reserves, and he will be tasked with ensuring the energy is being used in the Italian half.

The selection of Harry Potter over Dylan Pietsch on the wing is a nod to the importance of winning the territory and aerial battles, and that this will be part of the game plan for Saturday night.

The selection of Zane Nonggorr over Taniela Tupou speaks to a high work rate, and the bringing in of Billy Pollard for concussed Josh Nasser in the hooking role speaks to the speed of play desired by the Wallabies.

Related

The Wallabies cannot be said to have been lazy in their two defeats so far in July, but they have been inaccurate, ill-disciplined, and directionless at various times.

The improved selections, along with the work done to rectify the high penalty count and the acknowledgement that important pillars like the set piece are going their way, are all positive signs.

All that remains now is to perform. That aspect is no different from every week, whether you are on a massive losing streak or a major winning streak; just ask England how far they’ve fallen after their 12-game unbeaten run to now.

Nothing can sidestep poor performance, and that is a controllable factor the players must nail this weekend.

Italy are no easy beats, they ran the All Blacks close at halftime with a 10-14 gap last weekend, and only fell away in the second 40 minutes.

Had this game been set in Italy, the Wallabies would likely be underdogs after losing their last two games in Italy.

However, with the game being played in Perth, the Wallabies are the favourites and must embrace this and take that into the sheds.

The controllables are set to improve, and although the selections have been met with scrutiny by the wider Australian public, they are nonetheless logical to build on the positives from the first two games.

Nations Championship

Watch Hemispheres collide as North faces South in the brand new Nations Championship. Live matches, replays and highlights free on RugbyPass TV here

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

19 Comments
P
PM 27 days ago

John, you got the Potter selection right and the Mcreight off for Tizzano too more or less in your article earlier in the week.


Re the ‘directionless flyhalf play’ of last week my thought is wouldn't it have made sense to play Lonergan at 10 (and McDermott starting at 9)? Not every 9 looks as 10-ready but I think he could do a decent job. He steers so much of what the Brumbies do and he has familiar faces in Wright and Ikitau around him.

J
John 26 days ago

I am not sure about Lonergan to no.10 if I am honest. I just think the answer is obvious and staring us all in the face, if flyhalves get injured, bring in experienced flyhalves.

T
Two Cents 27 days ago

Hi John. Certainly some very good points there. I'd like to add that I don't understand why if the Wallabies are so keen to take the 3 even when they have better chances of forcing it over by going to the corner, why is no one ever setting up for a field goal?


Surely, we have the kickers for it and if we don't, then what are we doing about that? I find it baffling that the field goal has gone so out of vogue even though it's a perfect way to shift momentum whilst still ticking over the scoreboard in your favour.


And given the very apparent fitness and conditioning issues that seem to continually strike down the Wallabies and cost them later on in matches, that would seem like an obvious immediate salve to alleviate the impact of the forwards having to set so many rucks and run all over the field.


Because we clearly have no trouble making it into the opposition 22. The troubles start when we don't get that immediate impact from being up in their third and the longer we stay there but don't score the greater the risk of us turning it over or worse being a man down.


If we take a simple 3 points then suddenly it changes what the defending team can do to us. They can't sit back and wait for Australia to make a mistake because we will just kick 3s all day.


Instead, they have to put in the extra efforts to try to take the ball from us which then greatly increases the chances that they will be the ones making the mistakes and losing men. Advantage Australia.


It is infuriating that for the last 2 weeks, our forwards have been superior in the set piece, both at the scrum and at lineout time, yet in neither game did we exploit this advantage in any way.


Sure, it won us plenty of possession even in good field position but we didn't press these two areas of supremacy that we had. You can be sure had the Irish and French packs been the ones in control for the majority of the matches they'd have been absolutely ruthless.


Instead, they dominated us in the loose, taking advantage of our lack of urgency and lack of numbers to force turnovers and mistakes which ultimately deprived us of scoring. Fantastic organisation and belief from them. Woeful leadership and composure from us.


Despite what people are saying about Italy, they are a very dangerous side with many weapons that Australia can't simply hope that they'll be able to contain.


And if the Wallabies continue to be as wasteful with opportunity as they have been these last two games, then they will give up yet another prime opportunity to genuinely start building for the world cup.

J
John 26 days ago

It’s a good query, one that I do not have the answer to, unfortunately, but I will say that drop goals need to be considered more often by Wallabies players at large.


Italy is going to be a stern Test, that is just a fact of where the Wallabies are at and how good Italy have become.

A
Ardy 27 days ago

I struggle to agree with you. If we had Carter Gordon or Donaldson it wouldn’t have made an iota of difference. The backs got ball in bad positions and the forwards were beaten at speed to breakdown and an inablity to get over the AD line. The kicking game and as SB suggests, Kick Chase was lazy to lousy, aerially we were beaten everywhere.

As soon as the French put on pace we couldn’t keep up. That is fitness, ability to control the ball and discipline. These problems have been in the Wallabies for years, with the occasional light on the horizon ie SA TRC last year.

For Schmidt to say to a ref ‘I want you to penalise us for minor infractions’ is an act of lunacy, it’s up to him and the senior players to insist on discipline.

J
John 26 days ago

I think perhaps the tag of unfit or lazy were perhaps relevant in years gone by but I don’t think that is the case this year at all. The Wallabies are very fit, what I would argue is that few sides can deal with the amount of pressure they heap on themselves through some poor decision making and playing too much rugby in their half.

T
Two Cents 27 days ago

What the hell does “insist on discipline" mean in your mind that you think it has any relevance to what happened in the game?


If you train under the expectation that you'll be penalized even for marginal calls then you're going to practice playing in a way that doesn't attract disciplinary action.


It's a perfectly reasonable and intelligent thing to do for training and other teams have done it before so it's hardly new or groundbreaking.


The Wallabies have had well established long term issues with discipline so this was a way of bringing a different level of simulation to their training to help them overcome it.


And given the way the first half went it seemed to work a treat. Unfortunately, once they got tired and had long periods without the ball and then had no direction when they briefly did it have it again, they couldn't maintain it.


But it was a good thing to have done and begs the question why Joe didn't do it before.

S
ScrumJunkie 27 days ago

The ref was at training, to simulate game conditions

S
SB 27 days ago

Fixing their kick chase to fill the field would be a good start.

T
Two Cents 27 days ago

You don't need to worry about kick chase if you don't kick the ball away aimlessly but instead keep it either in hand or close to the gain line by chipping over the rush or grubbering it through.


Then instead of needing your players to be going flat out to get down field and then leap to contest the ball in the air you're putting it much closer to hand so they can time their run for maximum effect so even if the ball is lost they are there to create the pressure to force the mistake or set the breakdown.


Both are tactics that France employed to great effect against the Wallabies, vastly increasing the chances they'd regain the ball in broken play and once their guys get any sort of space they're away.


It went completely astray for the Wallabies' brain's trust and on field leadership (such as it was) that they actually had dominance up front so pursuing a strategy that forced France into more scrums was a definite pathway forwards that they never exploited.


Kicking long and having few or no chasers at all was literally giving the ball back to France without any pressure at all and when you give one of if not the best running teams in the world that much open field ball you're asking for them to punish you.


While Italy is not France, they too have plenty of fast mobile guys that if you give too much width to they're going to hurt you, as they have done to the Wallabies in their last two encounters.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

R
Red and White Dynamight 2 hours ago
'Bit unfair': Bulls boss Johan Ackermann's vow before All Blacks clash

“kicked out”. Safas clutch so desperately to their string of victim pearls that excuses are always at the ready to explain away their own poor management decisions. SARU threatened their SANZAR partners for years that ‘because of viewership numbers’ that they were owed a bigger slice of the broadcasting rights pie. Aus and NZ quite rightly told them to FO, SANZAR was an equal partnership. Notwithstanding that each partner brought their own strengths and weaknesses, certainly a winning record completely escaped SA teams as part of their ‘package’. OFS were chopped, and early, despite being 1 of the more attractive SA teams to watch. Still the concentration of SA players from 5 teams to 4 had little discernible improvement on teams performance. In fact, SA teams were - by far - the least successful partner. Only 1 Champion SA club whereas all 3 origin Aus teams won and all 5 NZ teams have won. SA teams had a 22% win rate in NZ - so noone was turning up to watch them - whilst NZ teams had a 50% win rate in SA. When Covid pandemic hit the entire World and, NZ for 1 closed borders in and out, obviously this impacted an International competition and whilst a trans-Tasman lite-Super comp returned eventually, SARU used this opportunity to scream “we’ve been kicked out”. The reality was a temporary solution that would have soon corrected itself. Of course everyone knows the Safas innately clutch desperately to being a victim - ‘noone likes us, we dont care’ - and everyone outside of SA knows that the truth is found elsewhere. After only a few seasons of turning up to matches with teams full of development players in the URC/Champions Cup, those partner nations and their fans are already sick of the moaning and whinging that inherently accompanies all things Sth African. SARU are probably still kidding themselves that they will enter the 6Nations and that they will be “kicked out” of the Rugby Championship. What a bunch of big babies.

50 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close