Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallabies reject 'us against the world' mentality

(Photo by Getty Images)

The view from two former All Blacks that Australia’s siege mentality approach to the Rugby World Cup will backfire has been rejected by the Wallabies.

ADVERTISEMENT

In fact, inside centre Matt To’omua says such an attitude doesn’t even exist despite the outspoken antics of his coach Michael Cheika.

A series of rulings against Australia from match officials and the judiciary have been publicly challenged by Cheika through the first two rounds of the tournament, at one point saying it felt like “us against everyone else” at the tournament.

Richard Kahui and Andy Ellis, both members of New Zealand’s 2011 World Cup winning squad, believe Cheika has created a negative vibe which will permeate down to the players.

Video Spacer

“I see Cheik and I feel for him because he’s obviously a man under pressure. It’s not just this World Cup, it’s been building the last 2-3 years,” Kahui told The Breakdown television show.

“(But) the way that he’s going about talking about referees and things, I just wonder how much that influences the players.

“It creates a negative environment and it’s like a snowball. It starts to build.”

Ellis believed the Wallabies had been “robbed” by some calls, particularly those made during Sunday’s loss to Wales.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the former halfback was critical of what was clearly a Cheika tactic to circle the wagons.

“I’ve heard the language being used – ‘Oh, it’s them against us’ – and I don’t think that’s healthy in a camp.”

https://www.instagram.com/p/B3CHVYHg6MT/

To’omua insisted there was no such sentiment behind the green and gold doors, and was keen to also shed any label of whingeing Wallabies.

“I wouldn’t say that’s the feeling within camp in the sense that we’re thinking everyone is against us,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t think (poor officiating) has had a direct impact or effect on the result of the game which is the main thing.

“If it was a last-minute thing we might have felt hard-done-by but we lost on the weekend because we were the worst of the two teams.”

Accomplished New Zealand referee Glen Jackson sided with his compatriots, believing Cheika had overplayed his hand with the ongoing criticism.

Jackson wondered if the negativity had impacted on Wallabies skipper Michael Hooper, whose frustration came close to boiling over in the direction of French referee Romain Poite during the Welsh defeat.

“He’s a great captain and normally pretty well-controlled but in that game, there might have been a bit of frustration through the camp and then his dealing with the referee in this game, he probably let himself down a little bit.”

– AAP

Former All Blacks coach John Hart has slammed the TMOs at the Rugby World Cup:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 8 hours ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

221 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT