Northern | US

Wallabies' game-by-game review for Nations Championship July series


PERTH, AUSTRALIA – JULY 17: The Wallabies pose for their official team photo during the Wallabies captain’s run at HBF Park on July 17, 2026 in Perth, Australia. (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)
Comments
13 Comments

The Nations Championship ended on a high for the Wallabies and their fans, but this series must go down in the history books as a failure.

ADVERTISEMENT

Two wins from the three Test matches was the widely accepted bar throughout Australia, and the Wallabies were very close to achieving this.

While the series as a whole must be deemed as coming up short on the ambitions and realistic goals both internally and externally, there are positives to take out of the July Tests as a whole.

VIDEO

Crowd figures

Three sold-out stadiums in back-to-back-to-back weeks right across the country is a phenomenal effort and just goes to show how much support still exists for the national rugby side.

Sydney came out and swarmed Allianz for 35k plus attendees, Caxton Street ferried more than 52k fans to Suncorp, and almost 20k packed out HBF Park in Perth, turning the Sea of Blue into a sea of gold.

It must be said that while the punters did their bit to show their support, the Wallabies struggled to always repay the faith shown, but the activations around the grounds have definitely improved.

It catered to a much wider audience, with an interaction-first focus.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies were treated to a combined crowd of more than 100-thousand fans screaming from the sidelines in just a 21-day window, which is epic.

Related

The quality of opposition

The Wallabies won four out of the six halves that they played, making for a 66 per cent win rate based on halves.

If we are to be generous, we could suggest that the second half at Allianz is the closest thing to being a draw as you can get without actually achieving it, but that would be stretching it too far.

The fact is that with the Wallabies being eighth in the world rankings, and playing against third and fourth in Ireland and France respectively, the odds were never in the Wallabies favour.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, let’s be honest about the quality of the opposition; both these sides, as well as Italy, were missing at least five key players each, and playing away from home at the end of very long seasons.

Ireland, whether by choice, injury, or other reason, were missing Andrew Porter, regular captain Caelan Doris, preferred flyhalf Jack Crowley, Mack Hansen, Ryan Baird, Jack Boyle, Rob Baloucoune, and Jeremy Loughman.

France were missing Antoine Dupont, Louis Bielle-Biarrey, Charles Ollivon, Julian Marchand, Damian Penaud, Thibaud Flament, and Gregory Alldritt, to name a few.

Not to mention, all these games were played on home soil for the Wallabies; had they all been played overseas, the optics would be different.

France traditionally don’t travel well down south, whether by their own fault or not, and Ireland has only played the Wallabies in Australia once since 2018.

Overall, losing to these sides after they had pretty decent travel schedules just adds insult to injury for the Wallabies.

While France were playing their regular style of rugby without the gold dust of some of their biggest stars, the Irish were simply ordinary throughout July and looked tired.

Related

The Wallabies own performance

The Ireland Test 31 – 33 (L)

It was clear for all to see that the Wallabies quickly and collectively got across the Joe Schmidt game plan in his third calendar year as coach.

The players were running shape, moving the ball, and executing the game plan a lot better than they had in seasons and games gone by.

The issue in this Test was the racking up of penalties and poor discipline at key moments and in pivotal positions on the field in the second half.

No possession, no territory, and inviting Ireland into their 22m zone regularly, was a fatal cocktail for the Wallabies.

Schmidt said as much in the post-match press conference, where he heralded the accuracy of Ireland in the “A-zone”.

Had Ben Donaldson kicked that final goal at the death, then the review would be the same, a tightly fought game where both sides had good patches but both were far from perfect.

Had the Wallabies won by the finest of margins, it would be just reward for keeping the third-best side in the world out after a strong Aussie first half followed by a determined Irish fightback.

The fact that this game went down to the wire is not spoken enough about; both sides were worthy winners, but both sides had also made enough blatant mistakes to lose.

Match Summary

0
Penalty Goals
2
4
Tries
6
3
Conversions
3
0
Drop Goals
0
156
Carries
135
5
Line Breaks
14
13
Turnovers Lost
11
5
Turnovers Won
1

The France Test 26 – 42 (L)

The Wallabies fielded yet another brand-new flyhalf and with it came a lot of uncertainty.

With the merry-go-round at no.10 in full swing, the Wallabies relied on previously underrated Ryan Lonergan to steer the ship from halfback, and for the second week in a row, he did so to great effect.

The Wallabies once again dominated the first half and succeeded in keeping the French out ahead of halftime.

However, unlike the week before, when the Wallabies were cutting the Irish up at will for a period in the first stanza, the Wallabies in Brisbane achieved their upper hand through sheer willpower.

The Wallabies’ tries at Suncorp came through gritty, tough, narrow forward play as opposed to the sweeping backline moves, linebreaks, and slick pod play of the game in Sydney.

The first 40 minutes were less refined, less intentional, and had a looser shape to it when compared with the first 40 against Ireland.

This was likely due to the debut of Declan Meredith, as well as playing against better opposition.

Unfortunately, the playmaking woes only got worse as the match dragged on and Jock Campbell, a career fullback, was inevitably and unfairly thrust into the pivot role.

The Wallabies played a lot of rugby between their own tryline and the French 40m line but rarely managed to camp themselves in the French quarter.

Despite these failed sieges, they rarely conceded penalties, which was a welcome change from the week before.

Nevertheless, poor edge defence meant the French didn’t need penalties to cruise their way into the Wallabies D-zone; rather, their dual playmaking stocks of Romain Ntamack and Matthieu Jalibert cut the Wallabies defensive line to pieces.

The Wallabies were outplayed by a better-balanced French side, who had the right players steering them around the field.

While the Wallabies excorcised their poor discipline demons from the week before, it was not enough of a step-up to be able to keep the free-flowing French out, and the scoreline actually ended up flattering the Wallabies.

Related

The Italy Test 57 – 10 (W)

The Wallabies were better than the Italians in every single way.

You pick a stat, and the Wallabies were dominant.

As for the Italians and their poor form, they were missing almost an entire starting XV of their best talent for the very last match of their very long season.

To name a few of their missing key personnel, there was no Ange Capuozzo, Sebastian Negri, Giacomo Nicotera, Simone Ferrari, Tommaso Menoncello, Tommaso Allan, Stephen Varney, Lorenzo Cannone, and Giosuè Zilocchi.

Nonetheless, the Wallabies’ shape, their decision-making, and poise were much more akin to the first stanza against Ireland than the opening half against the French.

Meredith looked more assured, and while he didn’t overplay his hand, he made sure that he was getting more touches to be able to influence the game.

The Italians, truth be told, were directionless, had very little shape, and were missing the likes of Menoncello in midfield to get them over the gainline.

This is not to mention that they were without their coach, Gonzalo Quesada, after he was sanctioned by World Rugby for comments he made about the officiating of their game against the All Blacks the week before. He wasn’t even allowed in the stadium.

Had the Wallabies not spanked them, then there would’ve been serious questions being asked.

Nonetheless, it is the biggest win by the Wallabies for quite some time, and that has given the fan base some much-needed relief; it also sets up the start of the Les Kiss era in a more positive light.

The Wallabies four pillars

Attack: B

It is as simple as this: being able to put 31 points on Ireland, 26 points on France, and 57 on Italy, a total aggregate score of only a converted try less than the All Blacks put on the same three sides is impressive.

The only complaint can be that the Wallabies fluffed a few more five-pointers in the Italian game and at times failed to finish their line breaks in all three matches.

Nevertheless, their A-zone execution stats will look healthy after proving they can now do more with less.

Related

Defence: C

By the same token, the Wallabies conceded a total of 85 points, while the All Blacks managed to leak just 70.

If you want that in points differential, the Wallabies ended July with a points differential of +29, while the All Blacks sit on +51; that seems like a pretty decent indicator of where these two teams are at.

To put this in perspective, the Springboks walk away from July scoring 130 points, and conceding just 49 with a points differential of +81.

This is even with them heavily rotating their squad and resting stars throughout. 

All this is to say that while the Wallabies tackled at 89%, 82%, and 91%, the Wallabies nonetheless conceded points, linebreaks, and dropped off tackles too often and at too many crucial points across the three matches.

While the percentages seem to be decent across an average, systemically, the Wallabies struggled to deal with the two pivots of France and the killer running lines of Ireland.

Set Piece: A

The Wallabies set piece has come on leaps and bounds under Mike Cron and Tom Donnelly.

While Cron has slowly built the base with his great batch of props, Donnelly has had to work quickly and hard in the off-season to get the Wallabies’ lineout back to Test standard.

A scrum of 100% across all three matches on their own feed, as well as lineout averaging 94% across the series, is just astounding.

Last time the Wallabies played Ireland alone, they had a 67% success rate at the lineout, which is a massive turnaround with comparatively rookie locks.

Winning your own ball on the feed is as good as gold in Test rugby, and it matters equally whether you’re pushing the opposition’s try line or defending your own.

Related

Selections: D

The non-selection of Lukhan Salakaia-Loto and the failure to bring in at least one other experienced flyhalf when Carter Gordon and Donaldson went down were both costly and unfathomable mistakes.

Although the non-selection of LSL made way for outstanding Josh Canham, or should we say Can-Him, nothing was stopping Schmidt from selecting LSL alongside his rookie Reds teammate.

It was evident that, despite the Wallabies displaying great skill in their pod shape throughout the Test series, they lacked grunt and a real enforcer, particularly after Tom Hooper also went down lame after the Ireland Test.

This inability to dent the line at times meant the Wallabies’ playmakers, experienced or not, were often forced to throw passes to forwards who got monstered off slow ball.

The capitulation in the second 40 minutes against the French can only be explained as an own-goal after relying on Campbell for almost 30 minutes of play.

In the words of the ‘Ice Man’ Bernard Foley, who has now returned to the NSW Waratahs after a long stint in Japan, “it didn’t need to be like this”.

Schmidt could and should’ve selected a Noah Lolesio, James O’Connor, or even Foley himself to at least be brought into the environment to help prepare the rookies.

The bringing in of Harry McLaughlin-Philips, Joe Brial, and Isaac Henry ahead of the last game against Italy was also a tad head-scratching; none of them would have added any experience should they have been selected.

Many would have been wondering where the likes of Samu Kerevi, Izaia Perese, Izack Rodda, and Seru Uru were, and whether they were worth a call.

Overall summary of July Nations Championship: C

The Wallabies now sit third in the Nations Championship pool behind the Springboks and the All Blacks, and one spot above Argentina.

The Wallabies’ ability to secure bonus points has meant they pip Argentina, with the Wallabies sitting one point ahead of them on eight points.

Their corresponding third-ranked side in the northern hemisphere pool is England, which has 10 points.

Match Summary

0
Penalty Goals
0
9
Tries
2
6
Conversions
0
0
Drop Goals
0
163
Carries
84
11
Line Breaks
1
13
Turnovers Lost
10
7
Turnovers Won
5

This sets the Wallabies up for tense clashes with England, Scotland, and Wales in November at their respective fortresses; however, some will argue this is an easier run of games than the ones just had.

Results aside, there is a lot to build on for this team, and as the team farewells Schmidt and Laurie ‘the Lord’ Fisher, they will feel and know they are heading in the right direction.

Schmidt and his cast of experienced older coaches have imbued this side with the attention to detail needed to keep growing.

The foundations are now strong, and the selection pool is deeper and wider than at the end of 2023.

Schmidt leaves the Wallabies to continue his pursuit of growing Australian rugby’s depth as he looks to oversee the Australia A program with Stephen Larkham.

All his and the Lord’s work has set up Kiss nicely to take over and to add finesse and excitement on top of a well-laid foundation.

Nations Championship

Watch Hemispheres collide as North faces South in the brand new Nations Championship. Live matches, replays and highlights free on RugbyPass TV here

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

13 Comments
G
GrumpEd 22 days ago

John,


You put the woes on our French performance on Meredith and Campbell, yet no mention of the Wallabies leadership on the field to try to alter the momentum. It appears Wilson’s captaincy cannot be criticised due to his “effort” on the pitch.


And your point about the Wallabies lacking grunt as the side did not have LSL in the July tests - well we did have some, provided by the player who has provided the most grunt for us this year and in 2021-2024 - Valetini.

Still waiting for LSL to have one of Rob’s performances while wearing gold. He did not do it ag Japan last year.

N
NH 23 days ago

My critique of this wallabies side for a long time, and continuing for these 3 matches has been poor game management and you touch on this John in your article. Long story short, the WBs win too few 22 entries and give the oppo too many to be able to beat the better teams. This in my opinion is due to a combination of a defence that concedes metres too easily, and a kicking (and catching) game that continues to lag behind the rest of the top nations. Errors or lapses in these areas then lead to turnovers, pressure and ultimately the conceding of penalties. Then it snowballs and creates a feedback loop which was particularly evident in the french game where the WBs couldn’t get territory or possession, fell behind on the scoreboard, which meant they tried to run it back from their 22 rather than exit, which led to more turnovers and french possession/territory etc etc.


As you surmise:

Ireland: “No possession, no territory, and inviting Ireland into their 22m zone regularly was a fatal cocktail for the Wallabies.”


France: “The Wallabies played a lot of rugby between their own tryline and the French 40m line but rarely managed to camp themselves in the French quarter.”


Three things I think the WBs could do immediately and would have some effect.

1) shore up their edge defence by putting ikitau or flook at 13 and adding lukhan to the mix to add some starch in the midfield and slow down oppo speed of recycle. If Kiss doesn’t want to change personnel, at least instil more intent in getting off their line (doesn’t have to be a rush).

2) exit early and efficiently like they did vs italy and compete with their defensive lineout.

3) Use more variation in their kicking like Wright with his 50:22s.


Given the WBs showed the ability and know-how to exit efficiently vs italy john, can you shed any light on why the wallabies were so hellbent on running the ball back from their own end vs france even in the first half? What was the tactic there given that even in that first half, they were under pressure territorially… It just really made no sense and ultimately turned out to be a poor tactic.

S
SB 23 days ago

With the set piece being strong, the platform is there. They just need smarter players all around the park, some experience would help in this aspect.

T
Two Cents 23 days ago

Pretty much everything I have been saying that a Wallabies team needs to do all in a singular performance, not just parts thereof, they finally did in the match against Italy and look at the result.


It is baffling to me that clearly we have players that know how to play that way and we have coaches that recognize that that is the way they need the whole team to play so why until now has no one been able to do it?


The history-making test in Johannesburg last year was what you would wish any side would be able to do, not just Australia. But the truth is that was a literal one-off. They won't even be able to play quite like that again.


The match against Italy, however, is the exact blueprint for how Wallabies teams should be playing all the time, crisp accurate service, dynamic running lines, variation in attack and just in general quality execution of the fundamentals.


The discipline was much improved because the team was playing with great patience and control. They didn't overdo it on either side of the ball and even when the Azzurri strung some passages together and managed to cross over twice there was never any panic.


I cannot backtrack on my earnest belief that the result happened in spite of Wilson's captaincy, not because of it.


He's a great player and always contributes something through his performances. But the responsibilities of captain go beyond simply being the best player on the field.


A captain must be able to read the game like a coach does and be able to reason why taking one decision over another is best in that particular moment of the game.


He doesn't do this so consistently that I can't think it will be ever a thing that he can do. So he should not have the responsibility even though he obviously wants it.


That he was made captain by Joe means that he shares that same 38% record and is just as responsible for achieving it. I feel that Joe’s detractors would rather we all ignore this uncomfortable truth so that the blame solely rests with the man they despise even though he's among the least responsible for it.


The head coach should not be an autocrat because the nature of a sport like rugby is that strength is only gained and success is only maintained so long as you keep looking to improve.


An autocrat never questions what they are doing. They never look in the mirror and have any doubts. They make a decision and whatever it happens to be is final and they never revisit it.


Joe is an analyst and meticulously goes through every piece of data he has available to him to work out the best possible way to deploy his strategies. It's why Ireland still has his DNA all over their playing style.


But something about that sort of approach clearly never sat well with the players because they were so seldom able to employ it to any great success. There'd be fits and starts of something but never anything permanent or comprehensive.


Joe had more impact emotionally on the game against Italy than he had with respect to the strategy or tactics employed. The players went out to win and did so without any doubt in their hearts that they would win. Because they were doing it for him.


In the prior two games they had controlling positions which they completely surrendered to their opponents and suffered the consequences. And the emotional energy that they brought to the final match was nowhere in evidence earlier on. That was the key difference.


It is crucial that whatever Kiss chooses to do with the side that he keeps in mind what they achieved in the Italy win and then simply replicates that performance after performance.


Obviously I'm not saying that it must be a carbon copy: that would be impossible since no two rugby games are the same.


But what needs to be understood and carried forward is the nous and intelligence that they played with in that game, how they completely tore apart the Italian defensive structures and kept them constantly guessing where the ball was going.


The fluidity and freedom that they played with, that's what the players need to be doing all the time going forward. And they earned the right to be that free because of the platform that the forwards created by gaining supremacy and never letting it go.


Everyone put in the hard graft and worked together to ensure that the result was achieved by the half. And coming back out they didn't get slack, they kept up the tempo and ultimately broke the will of the Italians resulting in their bench starting a melee in sheer frustration and disappointment.


They have the formula and clearly the players have the skill. They just need to do it every single time.

u
unknown 23 days ago

Games are won or lost . There are no marks for winning halves or getting close .

It good to see improvements !

Canham certainly grasped his opportunities so did Lonergan and Meredith .

There was no need for Loto or a back up at 10 .

Cron has done wonders .

The past is the past . We move on with Les Kiss .

No need for suppositions or predictions . WE WILL LEARN IN TIME !

Best to get behind Les and the team !

B
Bazzallina 23 days ago

Glass two thirds full I reckon John still need to look at some props depth midfield options and the halves especially Gordon needs to get on the paddock but even then there are options and some great to good performance ..how good the licking depth ditto the loosies and outsides

J
John 23 days ago

Not sure you can call an overall grade of C and a “fail” mark in the first sentence as a glass two thirds full take to be honest haha.


Centre is a work on but we have the cattle if we pick them and in regards to props, we have Ross and now Lambert who will likley come in as well as Schoupp eventually on LHP, THP is sorted for the first time in ever.

R
Rugby3 23 days ago

The thing is, Schmidt’s game plan while Wallaby coach plan has always been to get Jake Gordon to box kick the ball back to the opposition every time, to give the opposition the ball so they could score tries against us. That is the bottom line.


It is only since Jake Gordon was injured and Les Kiss has come in to advise that the Wallabies have started to make progress. But it has never been Schmidt’s preferred game plan and is not what he wanted. Now he’s trying to take credit for it. Ridiculous but typical.

N
NH 23 days ago

Did kiss provide coaching advice by how he licked his icecream in the stands?

B
Bazzallina 23 days ago

That was a game plan replicated round the world tho Rugby3 especially when a team struggling to make gainline and imo Gordon has always boxkicked a heap even tho he possesses a good running game and has a long pass those kicks go high

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

R
Red and White Dynamight 1 hour ago
'Bit unfair': Bulls boss Johan Ackermann's vow before All Blacks clash

“kicked out”. Safas clutch so desperately to their string of victim pearls that excuses are always at the ready to explain away their own poor management decisions. SARU threatened their SANZAR partners for years that ‘because of viewership numbers’ that they were owed a bigger slice of the broadcasting rights pie. Aus and NZ quite rightly told them to FO, SANZAR was an equal partnership. Notwithstanding that each partner brought their own strengths and weaknesses, certainly a winning record completely escaped SA teams as part of their ‘package’. OFS were chopped, and early, despite being 1 of the more attractive SA teams to watch. Still the concentration of SA players from 5 teams to 4 had little discernible improvement on teams performance. In fact, SA teams were - by far - the least successful partner. Only 1 Champion SA club whereas all 3 origin Aus teams won and all 5 NZ teams have won. SA teams had a 22% win rate in NZ - so noone was turning up to watch them - whilst NZ teams had a 50% win rate in SA. When Covid pandemic hit the entire World and, NZ for 1 closed borders in and out, obviously this impacted an International competition and whilst a trans-Tasman lite-Super comp returned eventually, SARU used this opportunity to scream “we’ve been kicked out”. The reality was a temporary solution that would have soon corrected itself. Of course everyone knows the Safas innately clutch desperately to being a victim - ‘noone likes us, we dont care’ - and everyone outside of SA knows that the truth is found elsewhere. After only a few seasons of turning up to matches with teams full of development players in the URC/Champions Cup, those partner nations and their fans are already sick of the moaning and whinging that inherently accompanies all things Sth African. SARU are probably still kidding themselves that they will enter the 6Nations and that they will be “kicked out” of the Rugby Championship. What a bunch of big babies.

50 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close