Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'There are academy players earning minimum wage - £8,000 a year... a 25% pay cut isn't fair'

By Online Editors
(Photo by Paul Harding/Getty Images)

Christian Day has described the haphazard way the 13 elite professional clubs in England individually applied their coronavirus outbreak wage cuts as an absolute mess. The Rugby Players Association player liaison has shed light on the lost ground his union had to make up following the scattergun approach by the Gallagher Premiership clubs – and newly promoted Newcastle – to the various pandemic-enforced pay cuts and furloughs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking on the BBC’s Rugby Union Weekly podcast, Day explained: “All 13 clubs have done this their own way. There was no discussion with us beforehand and no central discussion from Premiership Rugby (PRL) either.

“Each club has gone about it quite differently and that has produced 13 different problems to try and solve. What we would have preferred from the start was a lot more dialogue and understanding which is what seems to be happening in football currently. 

Video Spacer

Jono Lance lines up a switch from the Premiership to the PRO14

Video Spacer

Jono Lance lines up a switch from the Premiership to the PRO14

“They are not just saying ‘this is going to happen’. There is instead a discussion of why it needs to happen and how it is all going to work.”

Day was especially disappointed that low earners at some clubs were hit in the pocket rather than their circumstances being treated differently to the sport’s higher earners. “There are academy players out there earning minimum wage, there absolutely are – £8,000 a year. For them to take a 25 per cent pay cut, for me, is not fair. Those are the extremes of the situation we are trying to temper a little bit.

“All 13 clubs have done this their own way. Some started at the end of March, some are doing it for April. Each club had its own sliding scale as to who got cut what and each club would have a different bottom.

“Most clubs had a £25,000 ceiling on the cuts, but some didn’t, and then you had the complication of the government bringing in the furlough scheme, which added more complexity to it. Without central governance saying ‘this is what is going to happen and why’ it is an absolute mess really.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Everyone knows what we are in is unprecedented, the clubs are all suffering and the whole nation is suffering, but it’s just a case of trying to find a solution that works for as many people as possible.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 2 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Luke Cowan-Dickie: 'I didn’t feel right. I felt like I was going to pass out. Everything was going black in front of me' Luke Cowan-Dickie: 'I didn’t feel right. I felt like I was going to pass out. Everything was going black in front of me'
Search