Northern | US

The unjustified vilification of Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu

South Africa's fly-half Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu reacts during the Rugby's Greatest Rivalry international rugby union match between South Africa and New Zealand at Ellis Park Stadium in Johannesburg, on August 22, 2026. (Photo by PHILL MAGAKOE / AFP via Getty Images)
Comments
65 Comments

When Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu came off with an ankle injury in the act of scoring a try for the Stormers in their URC quarter-final in late May, it seemed his international season was potentially over.

ADVERTISEMENT

SA Rugby mag reported a three-to-six-month recovery timeline for a syndesmosis injury. After surgery in June, the No.10 was back playing in just 10 weeks. From three months down to two and a half, ahead of the biggest series of his career.

Since returning as the Boks’ flyhalf against Argentina, he’s had two performances below his game-breaking standard from 2025, while implementing a stale high-ball game plan.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Is anyone surprised by this given he busted his ankle less than three months ago and had surgery two months ago?

The main giveaway he’s not 100 per cent as he’s not kicking goals. The ankle injury is on the plant leg, and it likely can’t hold the weight in the kicking motion. Cheslin Kolbe kicked very well at Ellis Park, but Feinberg-Mngomezulu would be taking the shots if he could.

If anyone is to blame, it’s Springbok management for pushing him to return while recovering.

Along with Sacha, Siya Kolisi, Pieter-Steph du Toit, Eben Etzebeth, and Lood de Jager are all lacking minutes and playing on ambitious return schedules. Many of the veterans are undercooked for a series against the All Blacks.

The net impact of this played out in the first Test, where the Springboks turned up the intensity but couldn’t find accuracy. They turned the ball over 23 times.

ADVERTISEMENT

Feinberg-Mngomezulu was left scrambling to recover multiple balls that were sent behind him on attack. He played with a No.9 that had a shocking platform at the breakdown.

Williams and Feinberg-Mngomezulu take the blame, but the tape reveals a pack that couldn’t do their jobs effectively, leaving the ruck exposed, sloppy ball presentation, and countless errors.

What halves combination will play well off that platform? Even Aaron Smith and Dan Carter would struggle.

The Bok pack dominated the scrums, earning the adulation of their fanbase for the macho showing at set-piece. But in phase play where the spotlight isn’t so bright, they failed to do the basics well.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s the golfer who can smash a drive over 300 yards and can’t chip or putt. Drive for show, putt for dough. The Springboks’ pack didn’t want to play golf; they just wanted a long drive contest.

Let’s assume Feinberg-Mngomezulu was healthy enough; he’s still the best playmaker the Springboks have. How many times, after winning advantage at the scrum, did they give him the ball from the scrum platform to make a play?

You can count one, from which he had a line break running short off Williams. He nearly scored and was held up over the line by Ardie Savea and a handful of other All Blacks.

That’s poor strategy; even with a free roll of the dice, they didn’t think to provide to their best playmaker, instead keeping it in. The pack were more interested in the next testosterone hit instead of scoring points.

He took many hit-ups from the lineout, but it’s not the same. The scrum has eight forwards committed in a bind; there’s much more space available. Particularly under advantage, you’ve got a free play.

We’ve seen the flyhalf score countless tries in the big moments, against Ireland, against France, the flawless destruction of Argentina in Durban. He is a match winner.

The overall game plan was terrible for a player of his ability. In midfield zones, they asked their halves to put up high ball after high ball. In the red zone, they rolled forward carries around the corner for phase after phase.

These game plans are not coming from Tony Brown. There’s no way he would draft up a two-phase box kick from a lineout inside the All Blacks’ half. Nope. This is Erasmus all the way.

Feinberg-Mngomezulu is now on the bench for Cape Town, with Handre Pollard preferred. It’s not a bad call if you are going to persist with this plan. The weather looks like a leveller, and this pitch will play heavy if wet. Pollard can do what you need in this game plan.

Either way, their 24-year-old star has been mismanaged here, and it’s played directly into the All Blacks’ hands.

If he wasn’t 100 per cent, he shouldn’t have been out there. If he is out there, you’ve got to play a game that suits him, and they haven’t done that. Not in Johannesburg and not in Buenos Aires.

Feinberg-Mngomezulu deserves more respect in this situation; he’s not been set up to succeed. It’s a shame, as the No.1 player in the world last year; this would’ve been a career statement like Carter’s 2005 Lions series.

But if he’s not right, it’s not smart to risk the best No.10 in the world with a half-baked game plan.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

65 Comments
B
Brynlee 44 days ago

I’m an all blacks fan, and even I feel bad for the management making haste of his return, it’s better to let things fully heal than to just rush recovery 💚💛

T
Tooly 44 days ago

He overplays his hand .

Pollard won’t !

E
Eric Elwood 44 days ago

The biggest lesson SFM should learn from the injury incident was not to allow a Welsh player a free hit especially when you should have already touched the try down. SFM dummied to touch down and tried to arc around the defender for an extra few metres, leaving his legs vulnerable and the defender did maximum damage (legally). Might not be much talent in Wales recently but its a proper rugby nation and they are tough.

Was it Ethan Hooker who got a very late shoulder dislocation over the try line also? (that was a red card).

H
Hammer Head 44 days ago

It’s amazing just how much recency bias afflicts sports fans.


Either that, or rugby fans drink so much on Saturdays they can’t remember one week from another. That’s my excuse!


I suppose now that the ABs are the best team in the world - and Rennie has a 100% win record - we should start making comparisons with the great AB side of the last 100 years. Or was it 2011-2015.? Give or take 4 or 5 years either side.


When do we start doing that? Time is running out.


If the ABs lose on Saturday the latest great era will be over! And Rassie would have saved the boks again!


My heart.

P
Perthstayer 44 days ago

Was a good winning run. Will be a long while before a team troubles the 17 games ABs/Poms record. Shows how hard it is if Boks sweep so many WC's and cannot

B
Barefoot 44 days ago

Agree, we were outthought and outplayed at the breakdown and the forwards played like boofheads, but SFM and Williams also had a mare of their own. As a whole the team seems slow and unimaginative compared to last year, we’ve lost our mojo a bit. Hope the last game was the wake-up call we need to switch on and compete for the rest of the series.

p
proooooovince 45 days ago

Uhm, who was vilifying Sascha? Probably only Ben in another article 🤣

W
WJ 45 days ago

How many times do we have to see lack of game time and other player issues used as a reason SA performed as they did? We have heard so much over the last few years about the incredible depth Rassie has built. Well isn’t this why you build depth - to avoid being reliant on players who are not match fit for one reason or another?

So, is there incredible depth or isn’t there?

H
Hammer Head 44 days ago

One can have depth and have a lack of game time. In fact those two concepts correlate each other.

T
Tom 45 days ago

The Boks have got incredible depth in some positions. I don't think 10 is one of them. Manie is a talented player but he's had an armchair ride playing behind the big boys. The Bok pack is able to make the halfbacks look better than they are. I don't think Rassie is fully confident in any of his tens. He's trying to move away from Pollard but keeps having to bring him back in.

C
CB 45 days ago

Other players must comeback through the URC or Currie Cub. He is too arrogant and wants to do too much on his own.

H
Hellhound 45 days ago

Another BS article from BS. Clearly did not watch the game. The Boks were in charge everywhere except the score board. They didn't convert. 2 tries held up over the line, 2 more dropped the ball on the line. That's 4 tries gone. Minimum 20 points without conversions. There is no excuse for sloppy play.


The AB's bordered on the offside line, sometimes were offside and never got blown for it. Cards, ill discipline and butter fingers cost the Boks the first test. The AB's played well and deserved to win. They took every chance they got to convert points. The Boks didn't.


It's that simple. The AB's deserve their dues.

N
NoLongerARuck 45 days ago

Saying that the Boks fumbled their chances and were sloppy is simplistic. There were 8 tackle turnovers and 6 turnovers won on the ground. That sounds like good defence to me. Lots of it were forced errors from outstanding AB defence. Yes the Boks could have been more clinical and protected their ball better but they came up against a team having an outstanding defensive shift playing a tactically aware game. The All Blacks also owned the last 20mins. In fact they won the second half 21-3 so you cannot say the Boks were in charge everywhere but the scoreboard. Also you are the first person I have seen to talk smack about the ref. The Boks got everything they wanted from the ref, low ball in play time, contest at the breakdown, lots of scrum pens etc. The ref gave both teams a fair shake and he made lots of sensible calls especially when the TMO intervened. His impact was minimal and definitely didnt bloat the scoreboard in favour of the visitors.

B
Bazzallina 45 days ago

They were better than ABs but they were not in charge “everywhere” till last 20 there was a lot more back in forth than people are thinking

E
Eric Elwood 45 days ago

The sloppiness is NZ doing their homework and defending well, making it difficult for SA to score. It was five tries to one.

C
CF 45 days ago

Good article, BS must be using AI now 😆 This selection approach also shows the lack of trust in Manie who deserves better. Rassie does this in other positions as well and it totally undermines (and exposes) key combinations opening up gaps in defense which we have seen against Argentina and Australia in 2025. international rugby should only ever be played with 100% fit players no matter who they are.

N
NoLongerARuck 45 days ago

Yeah I struggle to see why Libbok hasnt been given more trust. The other angle to this is the Boks have likely lost Kolbe for this match and they see him as their best kicker after Pollard and they dont trust Libbok to kick at poles in the final 10.

J
Jacque 45 days ago

Totally agree. Anyone that knows a thing or 2 about rugby can see he’s nowhere near his best.

That goes for all the Boks. Eben, Marx, De Allende, Kriel. Kinda irritates me just to think about how BORING they played.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

The Boks were much better than the scoreline and result suggests.


Rewatch the game.

E
EvilMockingJay 44 days ago

Agree with you (and it's not happening a lot xD). But the result is here. Yeah the Boks were dominating the Blacks. And ? They did not score. 5 tries to 1, it’s saying something (even if i'm sure one of them involve a forward pass). They had a very bad time at the end, took 2 yellow at the same time (should have take a 3rd one with Libbok but the ref wanted to stay alive) and that was over. Dominate does not mean winning. Boks seemed lost when they had to carry the ball for more than a minute. Rassie is gonna be mad about that. I don’t expect the Blacks to win the 2nd test. The Boks don’t want Rassie more mad than he already is xD

B
Bazzallina 45 days ago

I did Hamner and I agree but also think the ABs were not getting as smashed as some been saying for first 50 …other than what we shall not speak of haha

L
Lou Cifer 45 days ago

Gave me Eden Park vibes all over….creating all the opportunities then for some or other reason fluffing it all up. Made it more gut-wrenching though

O
Olly 45 days ago

Sacha was well off the pace, and it does make you wonder how he was selected. Particularly given the options in SA. He was constantly out of position on the out-of-back plays, and fatigue must have been setting in as he called out the back balls when he had nobody with him to link with. I am not sure how this was not identified in training. Against a team like the ABs, he had no chance.

S
SJ 45 days ago

Sasha is top 3 in the world atleast when he is peaking, there is a saying that goes, form is temporary and class is permanent. My arguement is, Should you be finding form against the All blacks, who is now the best team in the world? Maybe we should have left that for either, when we have won the series, or, when the series is lost and the books have nothing to loose. And Am I the only South African that is heavily confused about the Kobus Wiese situation. He is in my opinion our most in form lock, he only had 6 minutes in the first test and now not even selected in the second?????

S
SF 45 days ago

Second time in a week I agree with you. Is this the real Ben Smith? Good perspective, but I still feel he overplays too much. He can’t run through this AB team like he does against weak opposition. I would play him on from the bench and bring him on at fullback. He can join the line from the back and then he will be at his most destructive. Let ML start and manage the game.

B
B 44 days ago

Could be a very tidy ‘dual playmaker’ trick starting SFH at #15 and ML at #10. From the start rather than finishing up that way.

G
GRB13 45 days ago

For once I agree with you Lebock should have started and Pollard should have been on the bench.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close