Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The 'big difference' that denied Marcus Smith a fair England chance

(Photo by Ramsey Cardy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Former England player Austin Healey has claimed that Marcus Smith wasn’t given a fair chance to impress by new head coach Steve Borthwick during the recent Guinness Six Nations. The Harlequins out-half was chosen as his country’s No10 in the matches versus Scotland and France. However, he was given limited time as a sub in the other games, a few late minutes against Italy and just 30 seconds in Wales before being an unused replacement last weekend versus Ireland.

ADVERTISEMENT

Smith was back in club action this Saturday, starting for Harlequins in their latest Gallagher Premiership match and going head-to-head against Saracens and Owen Farrell, his main rival for the England No10 jersey. Farrell was said to have marginally shaded that individual battle in a fixture that Saracens won 36-24 to clinch a home semi-final in May.

Prior to the start of the game at Tottenham Stadium in front of a bumper 55,109 attendance, TV pundit Healey shared his thoughts about the difficult situation Smith had endured with England, losing his place in recent months after being the No1 choice at No10 under previous head coach Eddie Jones.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Asked why Smith had struggled to impress with England in contrast to his greater consistency with Harlequins, Healey suggested: “The big difference is (Andre) Esterhuizen because when you are a player like Smith you like the outside. But if your centres also like the outside and Henry Slade likes the outside as does (Ollie) Lawrence, then they are quite happy to go with you.

“Esterhuizen will straighten up a defence and keep the tighter. The big difference is he never got to play with Esterhuizen for England for obvious reasons [he is a South African international] and he didn’t get to play with Manu Tuilagi, who is arguably the closest thing England have got to Esterhuizen. So when you have got a big, straight-running guy, he can close a defence off and keep them tight.

“When you haven’t got that then everything moves sideways and in international rugby, defences moving sideways control the whole pitch and that is the problem that he faced. You can argue, and a lot of English rugby supporters will argue, he didn’t really get a fair crack of the whip because he didn’t get to play with the same style of rugby that he plays with week in, week out at Harlequins.

“(Nick) David, beaten more defenders than anyone else in the competition, he has got him in the backline. He has got Danny Care, 10 try assists, better than any other nine in the country in terms of try assists and try creation. So, he has sort of been parachuted into a team that arguably doesn’t suit his style.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Quizzed if the Six Nations had definitely settled the Farrell versus Smith England No10 debate in favour of the Saracens player, Healey added: “No, I don’t think it was and it will go on through the camp in the summer to see where they get to.

“Watching Farrell in Ireland, he was right at the front of everything, and he stood up and he stands up to the biggest guys. There are not many fly-halves in world rugby that stand up to big backs, particularly the physical ones like the Irish have got.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 8 hours ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

221 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT