Northern | US

The Chiefs' players are under the microscope for the All Blacks

Anton Lienert-Brown of New Zealand during the Castle Double Malt Rugby's Greatest Rivalry, 2nd Test match between South Africa and New Zealand at DHL Stadium on August 29, 2026 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo by Ashley Vlotman/Gallo Images/Getty Images)
Comments
110 Comments

After losing captain Ardie Savea, centre Quinn Tupaea and openside Luke Jacobson to injury after the third Test, changes were expected for the fourth Test.

ADVERTISEMENT

While Savea is irreplaceable as a one-of-one player, it wasn’t expected that the All Blacks would drop off so much in the final Test with the changes.

There seems to be no progress with the high-ball issues, while an inability to recover from one error persists, with a cascade of errors contributing to massive momentum swings.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The All Blacks started poorly once again despite having the kickoff. They conceded a penalty for being offside after one phase, which invited the Boks all the way downfield, and they quickly conceded three points.

After that shaky start, they started to get the better of the Boks, and the signs were promising.

They constructed the first try to Codie Taylor after a Damian McKenzie line break down the left side. The fullback decided to hold the ball instead of attempting to link with wide open Cam Roigard inside, opting to be patient, and Roigard provided a great cutout pass for Taylor to get into space on the next phase.

Up 7-3, the All Blacks had the momentum and earned another 22 entry. A smart long kick from Roigard from a midfield scrum pinned South Africa deep, and the clearing kick failed to make it out of the 22.

This was a pivotal moment. The All Blacks have struggled all series to strike back-to-back. When presented an opportunity to take command of the game by two plus scores, they routinely blew it. Not only that, they’d find a way to give away the lead at the opposite end.

ADVERTISEMENT

On the first phase, Wallace Sititi crashed hard up the lineout seam down to just 10 metres out. The Boks were under pressure and the defensive line reeling. Pieter-steph du Toit was on the ground to the right of the ruck with no pillar defence set.

Roigard went left instead, ran a switch to Moorby, who then attacked the weaker side where Du Toit had regained his feet, but Moorby coughed up possession in the contact.

Opportunity wasted. Not only that, the Boks countered wide quickly, kicked through with a grubber and the All Blacks were caught outside their own 22. McKenzie, instead of clearing deep, attempted a cross-field kick that went through the hands of Anton Lienert-Brown into touch on the full.

In 60 seconds they lost total control of territory and possession. McKenzie’s all-or-nothing kick came up with nothing. It’s just awful Test rugby. There’s a time and place, and that isn’t it, when the team has just scrambled back 70 metres.

ADVERTISEMENT

Their reward for failing to release pressure was 12 phases of Springbok power, which ended with a try to Damian de Allende. South Africa took the lead 10-7, and the All Blacks would not get it back.

Compounding bad moments is a habit of this All Black team. It’s not just Moorby’s costly turnover; it’s everything that happens afterwards. They can’t shake a bad moment and stay in the grind.

The next thing McKenzie did after that cross-field kick was cough up a kick return from the very next exit kick after De Allende’s try.

There is clearly a lot of good that comes with McKenzie, but he is playing his way out of the All Black team right now. On South Africa form, he would be dropped. Even when he does something good, like make a line break, he can’t seem to make the right decision or execute the next part. It’s never clinical. It’s never clean. It’s chaos and often costly. Even back to the Sharks warm-up game, one potential try was chalked off with McKenzie in charge of the finish and nearly a second.

The biggest play of the game came from a McKenzie line break, with McKenzie and Moorby standing around protesting instead of tackling Arendse after they coughed up the ball. They teach kids to always play to the whistle. Do these All Blacks have to be taught like children again?

Tana Umaga’s defence has to come under the microscope soon. It’s passive, the line moves disconnected, and they concede so much ground. The will to tackle hard and win collisions was not in this All Blacks team in Baltimore.

Umaga’s appointment came with optimism and fanfare, but the reality is he coached the worst defensive unit in Super Rugby Pacific. Their negative 291 points differential was a whopping 148 points more than the next worse, the Drua with -143. Even when they finished 7th in 2025, they finished with the second worst points differential.

To illustrate the defensive weakness, after Arendse fielded a long Mo’unga clearing kick near the sideline and found Willemse, the passive D just let them dictate terms.

Moorby backtracked away from the situation, playing passive while lock-turned-blindside Tupou Vaa’i missed the first up tackle. Willemse offloads back to Arendse, who cuts open the disjointed forwards for 50 metres. These players with time and space will kill you, and they did just that.

Mo’unga, who made the clearing kick, had to make the cover tackle. By the time they actually set a decent line, they were 10 metres from their own try line. It’s way too late. On this occasion they were spared when Du Toit was pinged for sealing off.

Tupou Vaa’i has regressed as a player on this tour, and the move to No.6 is part of it. Two years ago, he was the All Blacks’ best forward in South Africa and in the conversation for the world’s best lock. In Baltimore, he slipped five tackles, gave away costly penalties and was a net negative contribution for the team.

Every player goes through form dips, and it’s sad to see Vaa’i lose the competitive niggle and passion. The bottom line is he’s not a No.6.

Missed tackles are coming from scrum coverage, where he can’t cover a back because he doesn’t have the speed to close the space. The Willemse miss was from a scrum clearing kick chase line; the miss on scrumhalf Van den Berg came direct from a scrum, which cost a huge line break and led to the Du Toit try.

The All Blacks lost a possession on the right touchline with Vaa’i responsible. Vaa’i, after gifting the pass early to Will Jordan, overran him and was then unable to clean out effectively.

The counter-ruck was effective, and South Africa win the ball. It’s the same ruck that Roigard gets penalised for ripping the ball away from Du Toit from a side entry. At the end of the day, they should never have lost that ruck contest to begin with. The evidence is clear that Vaa’i can’t play No.6, particularly against the Springboks.

The Chiefs’ players are under the microscope more intently than any other All Black. Fairly or unfairly, no one can forget 60-5 whenever they play. It’s seared into the memory of everyone who watched.

A team that loses 60-5 is a team that gave up. That quit. Right now, the All Blacks are full of those players, so it’s difficult not to question the selections when you see them repeat the same behaviours that led to them getting hammered in the Super Rugby final.

To be fair, Quinn Tupaea has been the best 13, Luke Jacobson proved a lot of doubters wrong despite the odd piece of ill discipline, and Wallace Sititi stood up during the series, but the rest left a lot to be desired.

Please prove New Zealand wrong, as the South Africa tour showed many of the Chiefs players aren’t up to it.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

110 Comments
N
NoLongerARuck 20 days ago

Pretty tough to criticise one franchise, some is fair, others isnt. Vaai and Dmac have been noted by many commentators to have been reliable players on this tour but they have been lambasted here. The rhetoric around the lost tour is a blame game right now and piling on the Chiefs players is quite frankly unfair. The tour was lost in many areas and many players made mistakes or struggled in certain moments. These were players from all of the franchises. In the end it has nothing to do with Super Rugby. This is an All Blacks team, they win and lose as a collective, when they are together the franchise identity is forgotten and an All Black identity is forged. The All Blacks have tried to play their own way and reforge their identity this year and go back to their DNA this year after the Razor sacking. Its not a Chiefs or Canes identity and its not based on their players either but rather on players that fit the system or contribute to the whole so I think you have to stop blaming a franchise for the failings of a national team coached by an international coach. That whole process is reductive and completely unfair to the franchise and the players that play for it. The buck stops with the national team, they are a collective and not a group of franchise players slapped together.

J
JW 20 days ago

no one can forget 60-5 whenever they play

I think everyone can do that, it was a freak game and that result was only because of the wind. It’s irrelevant.

B
Barefoot 20 days ago

Jeez Ben, with friends like you the ABs don’t need enemies.


You’re being tough on your team. Sure they coughed up opportunities but they played out of their skins, and SA didn’t allow them to play their best game.


Similarly SA had a lot of chances that we blew against the ABs, and often we lost direction in the AB 22. Hopefully the coaching team will look at that but we don’t need to blow the players’ heads off.


More and more I feel like a lot of these articles are rage bait and not well considered.

M
Mack1Mark 21 days ago

🤣 Ben Smith , what a Banker.

G
Graeme Hayward 21 days ago

Its a weird article. It looks like Smith is bargaining with the details to conjure up a story that sits well with his world view on rugby. Thats place I dont really want to go to.

B
BleedRed&Black 21 days ago

I'm picking Rennie will cut Slater, Mau, Lauaki, Tuipolotu, Hannah, maybe Darry or Lord, and Ta'eiloa in the forwards, bring in Scott Barrett and bring back Segner, so probably no Chiefs out. He might bring in another big loose forward, maybe Wrampling, and accept his Va'ai experiment was a bad failure, but will keep Parker. NZ has been crap at producing big loose forwards for the last ten years, with still no replacements for Kaino and Read, but he has to keep trying.


The backs will be a lot more controversial. Keeping Beauden Barrett after little involvement, and that a failure, can only be justified by maintaining the fullback as 2nd playmaker structure, so McKenzie and Barrett as a pair. Which leaves Jacomb to be cut. Technically a Chief, probably justified on the basis of gametime with Taranaki. But Lienert-Brown and Carter won't be cut, particularly with Tuapea out and Fineanganofo's availability up in the air.


So, in short, the only Chief likely to go is Jacomb, a Highlander next year. Which will be a difficult sell.


In reality almost all the Chiefs in the AB's are marginal 1st teamers or 3rd choice. Taukei’aho, Norris, Lord, Parker, Sititi, Ratima, Jacomb, Lienert-Brown, Carter and Narawa. A number of those marginal/3rd choice calls are justified, but a lot are not. Only Va'ai, Jacobsen, McKenzie and Tupaea are in Rennie's top 23 if everyone is fit, and even then Jacobsen and McKenzie wouldn't be in the 23 with a different coach.


My bet is that his and Barnes preference for their old club team will start to follow Rennie around very, very soon.

c
cnw 17 days ago

The problem is not 6-8. Vaa’i is still building into the 6 role but has all the attributes needed. The real problem rests in the composition and performance of the tight 5. Even Kaino would struggle with the pack on skates. That needs to be the focus for the next 10 months if the ABs have any hope of beating the Boks. And I disagree with dropping Paddy - his scrum was never on skates in any of the games. What we need hard experienced tight five forwards and Scott Barrett cannot come back soon enough.

J
JW 20 days ago

You forget Barnes is Jacomb’s coach at Taranaki, so he should stay. They might boot Beauden just so that he’s forced to go play for the naki.

C
Chiefs Mana 21 days ago

If only the ex-crusaders forwards coach would do his job well, we then wouldn’t have to moan about some extended squad members because they’re from a certain club

B
Blackmania 21 days ago

Interesting.

I still believe Parker will be cut. Blackadder will replace him numerically.

It will also depend on Frizell’s return to form. If he plays well for Tasman over the next two matches, he’ll be in. Don’t forget that Jason Ryan is a big fan of Shannon Frizell.

I’m curious to see who gets cut in the second row with Scooter’s return. The two Blues, Tuipulotu and Darry, probably have reason to be worried.

In the backline, I can see changes on the wings. Narawa won’t make it, and I’d put money on Fineanganofo not making it either. They’ll let him go to England. Faingaanuku will return, and I expect another Chiefs player, Kyren Taumoefolau, to be brought in fairly quickly. He’ll be eligible two days before the Auckland match. Maybe they’ll only bring him into the squad for the European matches, but I expect him to be in the group before the end of the year.

As you point out, there’s still the question of the four fly-halves. In a smaller squad, bringing BB back doesn’t really make sense. But you can clearly feel that Rennie is struggling with what to do about BB.

B
Blackmania 21 days ago

In my view, there are three senior players whose positions need to be questioned after this South African tour. Two of them are Chiefs players: Tupou Vaai and Damian McKenzie. And then there’s Codie Taylor.


Tupou Vaai had a difficult 2025 season with injuries and never really rediscovered the outstanding form he showed in 2024. And 2026 seems to be following the same pattern as 2025.

I’ve never really been convinced by his adaptation to the No. 6 role at international level. He is not a loose forward; he is a genuine lock. He simply doesn’t have the speed required to play No. 6. We need to stop with this obsession some people have with moving locks into the back row. In modern rugby, it simply doesn’t make much sense. These players lack the speed to intervene at the breakdown, lack the acceleration to get out of scrums quickly, and also lack the pace to get into support positions.

The upcoming return of Scott Barrett, and potentially Shannon Frizell, should allow Tupou Vaai to move to the bench. He can be an excellent impact player, but based on what he has shown for more than a year now, it is not enough to justify a starting spot. If it is, then the standards simply aren’t high enough.


With DMac, the situation is slightly different. Objectively, his performances remain at a good level without being exceptional. He does his job.

But we are still seeing the same limitations in his game. At 31, those things are unlikely to change. He still has that tendency to run across the field, he doesn’t always make the right decisions after breaking the line, and he doesn’t always look up and make the smartest choices. On top of that, he doesn’t provide enough security under the high ball. He isn’t solely responsible for that weakness, but he certainly doesn’t help solve it.

As I’ve already written, I’m surprised by the way the squad was built in terms of wings and fullbacks. There simply aren’t enough genuine options at fullback. You select pure wingers — Clarke, Fineanganofo and Narawa — fullbacks such as Jordan and Moorby who are only used on the wing, and then McKenzie automatically becomes the No. 15 with virtually no real competition.

That isn’t right.

A profile like Fihaki is genuinely missing from this squad.


And finally, Taylor. For a few years now, we’ve been saying that he is approaching the end of the road. His place in the wider group is still justified. He brings a lot of leadership to his teammates, but from a purely rugby perspective, he no longer provides the necessary guarantees — especially with Asafo Aumua now reaching full maturity.

The sporting choice seems obvious to everyone, yet Rennie continues to select Taylor ahead of Aumua. It’s difficult to understand.

Aumua should be the undisputed No. 1 choice.

Rennie has done a good job so far, but we need to be careful. This is now three consecutive defeats, and the pressure is going to be huge against Australia. Nobody expects a loss in Auckland.


Rennie needs to make some adjustments to his team and be fair to the whole squad. For now, there are still some selection decisions being made that don’t seem entirely justified.

That needs to be addressed.

J
JW 20 days ago

I’ve never really been convinced by his adaptation to the No. 6 role at international level. He is not a loose forward; he is a genuine lock.

You are confusing All Black 6’s. Steph will be no faster.


How Vaa’i uses his abilities and athleticism is what differentiates him from say one of the best right now. He needs to adapt his game and mind more for what suits ABs but he’d definitely be more athletic and skillful than some int 6’s.


He’s what I call a cruiser 6 though for sure, and we want bruiser’s like Scooter and Kaino.

T
Turani8tor 21 days ago

Fihaki would be a brilliant addition to this team.

T
Tk 21 days ago

One good point was made. Umaga hasn't ever actually coached a winning defence. This was the AB coaching appointment that surprised me the most. The ABs have for years been passive in D against much more energetic teams and this tour it was one of the aspects which killed us. Defence wins championships and we are far from being a champion team currently.

d
d 17 days ago

I’m wondering what any of the coaching squad actually add to this side. Sure after Razor had lost the dressing room there was value in letting the players be themselves, particularly with the red-hot Canes backs, but at some stage both coaches and players need to sort out the set piece together.

I
Icefarrow 21 days ago

Funny how he neglects to mention the Crusaders made up the bulk of the 2011/ 2015 RWC winning teams, despite not having won a title over an 8 year period (2009-2016).

R
RD 17 days ago

They also made up the bulk of the team starters (9) that lost to England at Yokohama in 2019.

J
Jacque 21 days ago

As expected form this drol.

Grow up man.

C
CG 21 days ago

No benders great

He hates the boks but so does everyone

Yes Umugas d is suspect

But the Friz is back

So is Lester and when are they going to give Fino a chance?

He was the best winger in SR

Fakatava is the second best 9 in the country

It’s early days for Rennies ABs and they are nowhere near the finished product

The horrible tour to safferland was a set up fail

u
unknown 21 days ago

Was a pretty good tour mate, didn’t work out like you expected but NZ will learn a heap from it. There were a couple of suspicious selections but there generally are, coaches always have their favourites.

d
d 21 days ago

Super Rugby can take most of the blame for the lack of skills, but its nonsense to single out the Chiefs players. Yesterdays men like Ioane, Tuipolotu and ALB , as well as DMac and BB, were always dodgy selections but Rennie was given a tough assigment and morale is being restored. If the axe doesn’t swing (and the best of the new crop given a chance) for the Bled defence, Rennie will be under the microscope a lot more in the second round of the Nations Cup.

u
unknown 21 days ago

Super rugby definitely influences the NZ and AU level of rugby. It would be far better to compete with the South Africans like it used to be, nice tough Southern Hemisphere comp. It is a lot softer especially with the set pieces and refereeing. I do believe there were a few silly selection mistakes but hopefully the All Black management see their mistakes and select the right squad for the bledisloe etc. they need to Focus on getting the set pieces right and then playing All Black Rugby, not chopping and changing everything depending on the opposition.

I
Itsallacademic 21 days ago

This is refreshing. BS turning to franchise’ism instead of Springbok bashing. Unfortunately, his views remain no less bias.


He “forgets” about Crusader players such as Will Jordan looking incapable of catching a high ball. Or Codie Taylor's inability to find a lineout jumped. Same with the Hurricanes. Lomax and Numia couldn't handle the scrums, Moorby's defensive frailties got exposed and Jordie got beaten by Arendse for fun. The Highlanders didn't have much representation, but De Groot got showed up, and Holland got a pass grade but nothing more.


Not trying to insult any of the players or teams, just pointing out the stupidity of blaming the Chiefs alone. The loss can mostly be ascribed to coaching and tactical failures, which isn't surprising given how little time Rennie had before the tour.

J
JW 20 days ago

He “forgets” about Crusader players such as Will Jordan looking incapable of catching a high ball. Or Codie Taylor's inability to find a lineout jumped.

There’s no bias against that though, unless you like blame injured players for going from being winners one year to wooden spooners the next.


The Chiefs look like they’re the best team but are yet to prove it.

S
Steppin 21 days ago

It’s just another classic Ben Smith click-bait (not-so) special. Notice the second to last paragraph usually always contradicts the title.

Z
Zac 21 days ago

All true..brainless

.. Vaa'i should have been dropped after his performance in the 3rd test. His discipline is substandard..too many basic errors..Mckenzie is not a test FB…bench at best…good article ..a lot of frustrating self destruction..hopefully Rennie will make a few changes…

.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close