Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Tensions rise between Cheika, Super Rugby clubs

Australia coach Michael Cheika. Photo / Getty Images

A host of top Australian talent have been left injured following a Wallabies training camp, causing tension between Wallabies head coach Michael Cheika and the Australian Super Rugby franchises according to The Sydney Morning Herald.

Wallabies players endured a nine-day fitness camp in Sydney last month where the Herald report Cheika showed concern regarding the condition of some of his players as the World Cup nears.

Cheika put his team through a time trial on the first day of the camp and forced players who were below standard to run sprints resulting in injury.

The Herald reported that Wallabies David Pocock, Adam Coleman, Dane Haylett-Petty and Nick Phipps rejoined their Super Rugby sides carrying soft tissue injuries.

ADVERTISEMENT

While no formal comment has been made, one club reportedly told the Sydney Morning Herald that the lack of communication between the Wallabies and the clubs is the most damaging aspect.

There is another five-day Wallabies camp scheduled for Friday.

The All Blacks and New Zealand franchises have experienced similar tension both this year and last year. Last year players well pulled from teams for scheduled camps and were required to sit for at least two games.

This season frontline All Blacks are limited to 180 minutes through the first three games of the season, with plenty already approaching that threshold after two matches.

Rugby World Cup City Guides – Oita:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 11 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search