Northern | US

Super W expansion delayed as 2024 schedule announced


Fijiana celebrate their Super W win. Photo by Kelly Defina/Getty Images
Comments
Comment

The Super W competition won’t be expanded in 2024 with Rugby Australia instead putting resources into the women’s pathways including a new national youth competition.

ADVERTISEMENT

RA announced the draw for next season on Tuesday, which will again feature the five Australian teams plus Fiji Drua, who have won the past two titles, without any cross-over with New Zealand’s women’s competition.

The five-round season, plus a two-week finals series, kicks off on Friday, March 15 with the Western Force hosting the Melbourne Rebels.

Games will be mostly played as double-headers alongside the men’s Super Rugby Pacific competition.

RA said there would be additional investment into the women’s high-performance program and player development pathways, with the Next Gen Sevens evolving into the Super Rugby Women’s 7s competition and the launch of an all-new Super Rugby women’s U19 competition.

Wallaroos skipper Michaela Leonard, currently in New Zealand with Australia competing in the inaugural WXV1 tournament which features the world’s top six teams, backed RA’s plans.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallaroos and head office were in a stand-off two months ago over the disparity between the women’s and men’s programs with RA then vowing to take steps towards a fully professional future for the elite players and invest more broadly in women’s rugby across national and community competitions.

“Obviously Rome wasn’t built in a day so we’re building towards that professional element and hopefully expansion

of the Super W over the coming years,” Leonard said.

“Rugby Australia’s got some really exciting prospects moving forward over the next couple of years, and some advancements in our structure and the way people work to help us to begin to bridge that gap between where we are and professionalism.”

Related

RA boss Phil Waugh said they were committed to expanding the league when more funding was available.

ADVERTISEMENT

“While we would have loved to expand the Super W competition – and we remain committed to doing so – the reality is that the investment required to do so for 2024 would have required the removal of funding from other areas of the women’s program, such as development, the new high-performance staff and player payments,” Waugh said in a statement.

“In the near future, we will be able to share more details about the second phase of Rugby Australia’s strategic plan for the growth of the women’s game, encompassing the 2024 and 2025 seasons leading into the next Rugby World Cup in England.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 16 minutes ago
'Entirely different to what the referees asked for': All Blacks assistant on South African TV director's influence

That is completely untrue. The broadcaster controlling the big screen shows whatever they want completely independent of the referee or TMO. When the referee requested to see something on the big screen, the broadcaster controls it, not the TMO. The TMO does not control the TV replays in these games. I went to the ABs game in Paris in 2024 and the big screen was constantly showing replays of ABs infringements. Not once did they show anything the other way. Likewise I went to France vs Ireland earlier this year and France won convincingly but honestly the big screen at the ground was worth 14 points for France. I was a neutral for that game, and in fact probably cheering for France, but it was disgraceful. Totally fair if it works both ways in the same game, but siting an example from 15 years ago seems a bit desperate. I am saying the call was right. Roigard was offside. But if only one team benefits from constant replays, regardless of which team is benefiting, then it is unfair. Where are the replays of Marx crawling over the try line? - not shown at all at the ground. How painful was it to get the replay of the high shot on Barrett? Listen to it over again, the TMO had to keep requesting different angles, it was not freeze framed at any point, and it was not shown live at the ground after the incident. The only reason it was checked is because Barrett didn’t get up afterwards. Defend it all you like while it benefits you I guess.

52 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close