Super Rugby Aotearoa: Hurricanes player ratings vs Crusaders
On a wet Sunday afternoon in Wellington, the Hurricanes played host to the Crusaders in the second round of Super Rugby Aotearoa. Both sides entered the match without a win to their names (the Hurricanes lost to the Blues in the first week while the Crusaders had a first-round bye) so there was plenty of motivation for players on both sides of the pitch.
The Crusaders took an early lead through Sevu Reece and scored plenty of tries on the night while the Hurricanes kept themselves in the hunt for most of the encounter thanks to the boot of Jackson Garden-Bachop. In the end, the Crusaders’ try-scoring prowess was simply too much for the home side, with the visitors winning 39-25.
How did the Hurricanes players rate?
1. Fraser Armstrong – 7/10
Handled himself well in the set-piece and defended stoutly.
2. Dane Coles – 5.5
The Hurricanes needed more from him. The lineout wasn’t functioning that well and he didn’t bring his abrasive game. Was a tad quiet. When his team had a penalty in front of the Crusaders’ sticks and the call was for points not a scrum, you got the sense that the Hurricanes were mentally shot. Not his best day out.
3. Tyrel Lomax – 7
Credible performance against one of the greatest loose heads to play the game. Worked in the tight and didn’t shirk it.
4. James Blackwell – 8.5
Quite possibly the man of the match. Did he ever stop working? Carried strong and stole a lineout or two. Hard to comprehend where the Hurricanes would be without this workhorse. He had a defensive misread that did not lead to a try but outside of that was all ticker. Well played, that man.
5. Vaea Fifita – 4
Rubbish match. He is capable of so much more but his body height was poor into contact as was his technique. Will need to work hard to justify selection next week.
6. Reed Prinsep – 6
Worked hard in defence but didn’t really bring much in possession. He’s an intelligent player but was guilty of being lateral when coming around the corner, and being too deep when taking the ball. Needs to square up and flatten up when taking on the line.
7. Du’Plessis Kirifi – 8
Big effort and defensively the best Hurricane on the park, making 11 tackles. He copped the odd harsh call from the referee at the breakdown but that still did not deter him from him imposing himself in that space.
8. Ardie Savea – 6.5
Worked his way into the match but looked short of a run as he didn’t dominate as he has in seasons past. Would have liked him to work off Blackwell more but still expect he and Kirifi to blend well in the near future.
9. TJ Perenara – 7.5
Very solid performance by the All Blacks scrum half. Even when he made the odd error, he was the first to look to fix his own mistake. Made a try saving intercept which typified his ability to read an attack. Had a period of time off the park due to a head injury assessment but returned to the fray with all of his class.
10. Jackson Garden-Bachop – 7.5
Good day out but cost his side a certain 7 points after failing to pop to Ngani Laumape on his right after making a wonderful break himself. Laumape was clear for the line under the black dot but it wasn’t too be. Needs to trust his own running game further as the Hurricanes looked better when he took on the line.
11. Ben Lam – 5.5
Poor on defence. Crusaders scored twice down his edge early in the match and the big man had defensive misreads that should not be excused at this level. Furthermore, in attack needs to square the hips and hit the space at pace. Ran too laterally but did actually clean out well at times, to his credit.
12. Ngani Laumape – 6.5
Run the ball, son. That’s what your good at, that’s what you should do. When Laumape is part of an unnecessarily complex attack, he loses clarity and sometimes makes basic errors – as we saw early in the first half. Play him flat and play him hard at the line. Worked well to put Asafo Aumua over for his try.
13. Vince Aso – 6
Made two damaging attacks but undid the good work with kicks instead of looking for his support. His own performance typified that of the Hurricanes, strength and stupidity in the blink of an eye. He has better rugby in him and needs to straighten the attack and move the ball while backing up on the inside as opposed to running his attack to the edge and suffocating opportunity.
14. Wes Goosen – 6.5
A dependable performance. Doesn’t give his opponent much, chased his kicks and made most of his tackles. Had limited opportunity in attack and probably needed to look for a little more work. However, was part of a backline that appears unsure of what it’s trying to do.
15. Chase Titia – 6.5
Immensely talented, has shades of Andre Taylor about him. Had moments of brilliance but there were moments he looked lost in defence and needed to communicate better with his wingers. He will get better with greater exposure at this level.
Stock in Blues' rookie Hoskins Sotutu is skyrocketing every week ?? #CHIvBLU #SuperRugbyAotearoa #BluesRugby https://t.co/M9aIdMq2Ih
— RugbyPass (@RugbyPass) June 20, 2020
Reserves:
16. Asafo Aumua – 6.5
Scored a very good try late in the match to keep his side in the match. Needed to look for work closer in where his physicality is best used.
17. Ben May – 5
Worked hard to lift the tempo but was caught out on a lazy defensive read late in the match allowing David Havili to cross the paint untouched. A player of his experience should have done better. Not a great day out for him.
18. Alex Fidow – 5
Didn’t have much of an impact.
19. Scott Scrafton – 5
Should get a run next week for Fifita. Made a few tackles and won a lineout or two in his cameo.
20. Gareth Evans – 5.5
The Hurricanes missed what he can bring right from the start.
21. Jamie Booth – 6.5
Very handy performance when Perenara was off. Brought the energy and straightened the attack. Hurricanes have a ready-made replacement for their co-captain.
22. Billy Proctor – 5
Needed to make more of an impact.
23. Kobus van Wyk – 3
Made some very very costly errors.
Comments on RugbyPass
Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause
6 Go to commentsNo way. If you are trying to picture New Zealand rugby with an All Blacks mindset, there have been two factors instrumental to the decline of NZ rugby to date. Those are the horror that the Blues have become and, probably more so, the fixture that the Crusaders became. I don’t think it was healthy to have one team so dominant for so long, both for lack of proper representation of players from outside that environment and on the over reliance on players from within it. If you are another international side, like Ireland for example, sure. You can copy paste something succinct from one level to the next and experience a huge increase in standards, but ultimately you will not be maximizing it, which is what you need to perform to the level the ABs do. Added to that is the apathy that develops in the whole game as a result of one sides dominance. NZ, Super, and Championship rugby should all experience a boom as a result of things balancing out. That said, there is a lot of bad news happening in NZ rugby recently, and I’m not sure the game can be handled well enough here to postpone the always-there feeling of inevitable decline of rugby.
6 Go to commentsNo SA supporter miss Super Rugby - a product that is experiencing significant head wind in ANZ - the competition from rival codes are intense, match attendance figures are at a historical low and the negativity of commentators such as Kirwan and Wilson have accelerated the downward spiral in NZ. After the next RWC in 2027 sponsors will follow Qantas and start leaving in droves.
2 Go to commentsLike others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
6 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
6 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
2 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
2 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to comments