Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

South Africa set to end 2024 on top of world rankings

CARDIFF, WALES - NOVEMBER 23: Siya Kolisi of South Africa makes a break to score a try that is later disallowed during the Autumn Nations Series 2024 match between Wales and South Africa at the Principality Stadium on November 23, 2024 in Cardiff, Wales. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

South Africa’s 45-12 win over Wales in Cardiff makes it impossible for them to be overtaken at the top of the world rankings before the year is out.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks have been in first place in 2024 for all but six weeks, when Ireland held sway, and will enter 2025 looking down on the rest.

Second-placed Ireland have another game to play, against Australia at the Aviva Stadium next weekend, but the home side won’t be able to wipe off the two-point deficit between themselves and the Springboks

New Zealand will be hoping for a favour from Australia as a defeat for Ireland would result in the All Blacks taking second place off Andy Farrell’s men.

There was very little change to the top 20 of the rankings, despite a full round of Autumn Nations Series fixtures, with Uruguay the only team to improve their position thanks to their 23-21 win away to Romania.

World Rankings Top 10 (officially updated at 12 noon on Monday)

1. South Africa (92.78)
2. Ireland (90.78)
3. New Zealand (90.36)
4. France (88.51)
5. Argentina (84.97)
6. Scotland (83.34)
7. England (82.31)
8. Australia (81.52)
9. Fiji (80.07)
10. Italy (78.64)

Related

Go behind the scenes of both camps during the British and Irish Lions tour of South Africa in 2021. Binge watch exclusively on RugbyPass TV now 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 15 minutes ago
'It doesn’t make sense for New Zealand to deny itself access to world-class players'

There are a couple of inadequacies in this articles points as well.


First

Robertson, in what he has said publicly, is building his argument for change as a means to close the gap that is increasing between the All Blacks and South Africa.

Based on recent performances, the All Blacks are better than the Springboks.


Second

Both games saw the All Blacks lead coming into the last 30 minutes, only for the momentum to shift dramatically once the two sides emptied their respective benches.

The failings of the second half were game plan related, they happened regardless of whether the bench had yet (play got worse very early in the half, even in the first half) been used or not.


And third

Robertson’s view is that because the Boks don’t lose access to their experienced players when they head offshore, it gives them an advantage

Didn't Razor have the most experienced team all year?


Also

“Sam Cane and Ardie Savea with Wallace Siti, what a balance that is.

This is part of Razor's problem. That's a terrible balance. You instead want something like Sam Cane, Hoskins Sotutu, Wallace Sititi. Or Ardie Savea, Sititi, Scott Barrett. Dalton Papaili'i, Savea, Finau. That is balance, not two old struggling to keep up players and an absolute rookie.

It has changed. Not many go north, more go to Japan, so how do we get the balance right to ensure that players who have given loyalty, longevity and who are still playing well

Experience is a priceless commodity in international rugby and New Zealand has a system where it throws away players precisely when they are at their most valuable.

You mean how do we take advantage of this new environment, because nothing has effectively changed has it. It's simply Japan now instead of Europe. What's it going to be like in the future, how is the new American league going to change things?


Mo'unga is the only real valid reason for debating change, but what's far more important is the wide discussion happening that's taking the whole game into account. The current modem throws players away because they decided to go with a 5 team model rather than a 12 or 14 team model. Players have to be asked to leave at the point were we know they aren't going to be All Blacks, when they are playing their best rugby, reached their peak. In order to reset, and see if the next guy coming through can improve on the 'peak' of the last guy. Of course it's going to take years before they even reach the departing players standards, let alone see if they can pass them.


What if there can be a change that enables New Zealand to have a model were players like Jamison Gibson-Park, James Lowe, Bundee Aki, Chandler Cunningham-South, Ethan Roots, Warner Dearns are All Blacks that make their experienced and youth developemnt the envy of the World. That is the discussion that really needs to be had, not how easy it is to allow Mo'unga to play again. That's how the All Blacks end up winning 3 World Cups in a row.

27 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will overseas selection make the difference for British and Irish Lions? Will overseas selection make the difference for British and Irish Lions?
Search