Rugby union civil war brewing as PRO14's European dominion returns?
Buckle up.
Here comes a round six weekend where the PRO14 is growling with a collective Champions Cup snarl not witnessed since January 2012.
Come close of business on Sunday, five of the league’s seven participants could have reached the last eight, a development that will surely prompt an outpouring of Anglo-French anguish.
Leinster, Munster, Ulster and Glasgow are all out to do a number on Premiership opposition, Edinburgh have a Top 14 scalp in their sights. Bring it on is the united Celtic cry.
If all goes to plan and all five progress, it will reap a rich qualification harvest last savoured seven years ago.
Cardiff, Edinburgh, Leinster, Munster and Ulster all qualified back then for the European quarter-finals, and the rumbustious party didn’t stop there either. Three progressed to the semis, the campaign culminated in an all-Irish final in London and the fall-out was toxic.
English and French club owners demanded out from the existing European Rugby Cup (ERC) tournament. Demanded freedom to set up their own tournament and structure it differently. They got their way after a bloody civil war and Celtic consequences were initially grim.
Ever since the 1996/97 introduction of quarter-finals, there had always been a Celtic presence in the knockout stages.
However, four years after they enjoyed their greatest ever quarter-final show of strength, the cupboard was scarily bare. Not a single Irish, Welsh or Scottish side reached the last eight and the fearful outlook was that English and French money would go on and dominate, turning the business end of the three-league, six-nation event into an annual Anglo-French only affair.
The doomsayers, though, couldn’t have been more wrong. One season was all it took for the Celts to bounce back, three clubs reaching the 2017 quarter-finals.
It was the same representation last term, with the even better outcome of Leinster lifting the trophy. And now there’s even more PRO14 clubs spoiling for recognition. Its clubs occupy third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh spots in the qualification rankings after five rounds of matches.
It’s been quite the fightback, but will it prompt another divisive Anglo-French reaction? The last time there was a Celtic Five contingent reaching the last eight the toys – and everything else – came out of the pram.
Now, with the Champions Cup currently only having heads of agreement, television and sponsorship deals that run through to 2022, it will be interesting how relations develop in the next year or so.
Already, there are rumblings of a further reduction in participants, 20 teams cut to 16 to allegedly aid player welfare. There is also a summer 2020 deadline for people to announce their intention to quit the tournament in 2022. This was the clause that signalled the end for Europe’s previous incarnation, the French and English announcing in 2012 they would be gone from ERC two years later.
That painful goodbye that led to the formation of the rival European Professional Club Rugby (EPCR) which was supposed to make life harder for the Celts. Aside from the English and French cornering a greater share of the finances generated, the overall number of participants was shaved from 24 to 20 and no more would 11 PRO12 teams be accommodated, as was the case in ERC’s last tournament in 2013/14.
Neither would there be a guaranteed slot for at least one team each from Ireland, Italy, Scotland and Wales. Only the top six in the league would automatically qualify, putting pressure on PRO12 clubs to take their league more seriously than before.
The Anglo-French hope was that having PRO12 clubs compete more aggressively on two fronts would end to the practice of the Celts peaking for Europe by often excusing leading players from league matches.
It initially had the desired effect. The PRO12’s clubs struggled to keep pace when they went into Europe. Just one PRO12 team (Leinster) reached the last eight in 2014/15. A dramatic fall-off in fortunes in fixtures against Top 14 clubs was especially to blame.
Whereas 11 of 24 PRO12 versus Top 14 pool games (45.8%) were won by the Celtic teams in 2013/14, a campaign where three Irish provinces made the knockout stages, just four of 16 (25%) of these French fixtures were won by the Celts the following season.
Then came the devastating post-World Cup winter crash versus the English. PRO12 teams managed just two wins in 16 fixtures (12.5%) against Premiership opposition in 2015/16, an imbalance that resulted in a record five English sides making the knockouts in contrast to zero Celts getting through.
Doom and gloom? You bet. But predictions it would last long were dismissed by the likes of Stuart Lancaster. The former England boss was hardly a wet week in the door at Leinster when he shrugged off this perceived trend of Anglo-French dominance.
‘There was five English teams in the quarter-finals last season, do you think that was down to money or was it the timing of those pool games in the immediate aftermath of the World Cup which ultimately decided who was going to be in the quarter-final?
‘Ireland got to a later stage than England so their boys pretty much came back after losing against Argentina into Wasps. That had a bearing on it,’ he reasoned. ‘From what I have seen here, I personally don’t subscribe to the fact that the English and the French clubs will dominate.’
How right he was, Leinster winning their first trophy last May since leading the Celtic charge in 2012. The league’s teams won 11 of 18 pool fixtures last season against Premiership opposition (61.1%), a figure that stands at 10 wins in 15 games this season (66.6%). And last season’s six pool wins in 16 record versus the French (37.5%) now reads eight wins in 13 games this term (61.5%). Healthy numbers.
What will annoy Premiership and Top 14 clubs is their Celtic rivals are again at a stage where they don’t have to go all out to win league games as exhaustingly happens weekly in England and France where relegation exists.
The introduction of two South African clubs saw PRO12 become PRO14 and it led to a conference-style system, two divisions of seven where the top three clubs in each automatically qualify for Europe.
Continue reading below…
It’s a distorted method. Cardiff secured Champions Cup qualification for this season despite finishing fourth in Conference A, third place South African side Cheetahs ineligible to qualify for Europe.
Fair enough, you might say, but was it fair that Cardiff went through automatically when their 54 points tally was eclipsed by Ulster on 62 points and Treviso on 55 in the fourth and fifth Conference B places?
Clubs are evidently putting more emphasis on games against teams in their own conference, a targeting of fixtures epitomised by recent Edinburgh rotation.
Mindful of saving their best for the back-to-back December European clashes with Newcastle, they sent an unrecognisable XV to Cork the previous week and were shredded by six first-half tries from Munster, a team in the other conference whose fortunes don’t really matter to the Scots.
Not a good look for the league but a worthwhile bigger picture sacrifice as Edinburgh defeated Newcastle twice and now lead their European pool heading into Saturday’s Murrayfield finale against Montpellier.
They’re not alone. The Celts are back en masse and ready to party like it’s 2012 all over again.
Comments on RugbyPass
Beaches? In Cardiff? Where?
1 Go to commentsHe is right , the Crusaders will be a threat. Scott Barrett, ( particularly), Fergus Burke , Codie Taylor, ( from sabbatical) etc due back soon for the Crusaders. There are others like Zach Gallagher too. People can right the Crusaders off, Top 8 , here we come !!
1 Go to commentsWe will always struggle for money to match the other sides but the least the WRU can do is invest properly in Welsh rugby. Too much has been squandered on vanity projects like the hotel and roof walk amongst others which will never see a massive return. Hanging the 4 pro sides out to dry over the last decade is now coming back to bite the WRU financially as well as on the pitch. You reap what you sow.
1 Go to commentsWhat do you get if you cross a doctor with a fish? A plastic sturgeon
14 Go to commentsWhat happened to feleti Kaitu’u? Hasnt played in a while right?
1 Go to commentsGregor I just can’t agree with you. You are trying to find something that just isn’t there. Jordie Barrett has signed until 2028. By the end of that he would have spent probably 11-12 years on Super Rugby and you say he can’t possibly have one season playing somewhere else. It is absurd. What about this scenario, the NZR play hard ball and he decides to leave and play overseas. How would that affect the competition. There seems to be an agenda by certain journalists to push certain agendas and don’t like it when it’s not to their liking. I fully support the NZR on this. Gregor needs to get a life.
2 Go to commentsHope he stays as believe he can do a great job.
1 Go to commentsMake what step up? Manie has a World Cup winner’s medal around his neck and changed the way the Springboks can play. He doesn’t have anything to prove to anyone. The win record of the Boks with him in the team is tremendous. Sacha can be wonderful and I hope he has a very succesful Bok career, but comparing him to Manie in terms of the next Bok flyhalf is very strange. Manie is the incumbent (not the next) and doing pretty incredibly.
1 Go to comments00 😍 U
1 Go to commentsSabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.
2 Go to commentsJake White talks more sense than anything I've read in the last 5 years. Hope someone's listening.
9 Go to commentsThe Springboks tried going down the road of only picking home-based players and it was an unmitigated disaster in 2016 and 2017. Picking overseas-based players has been one of the main reason the Boks have done so well since 2018, not only because of the quality Rassie could call on, but because of the knowledge and experience those players brought into camp from England, France and Japan. With some of the big names playing abroad it also gave younger players in SA the chance to break through at franchise level. Would we have seen the emergence of a Ruan Nortje if RG and Lood were still at the Bulls? Not so sure. I understand why Jake would want to block players leaving since his job depends on good results but it’s an approach that would take Bok rugby back to the bad old days and no South African wants to see that.
9 Go to commentsExeter were thumped by 38 points. And they only had to hop on a train.
39 Go to commentsI am De Groot.
1 Go to commentsHad hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”
11 Go to commentsWhat was the excuse for the other knockout blowouts then? Does the result not prove the Saints were just so much better? Wise call to put your eggs in one basket when you’ve got 2 comps simultaneously finishing.
39 Go to commentsReally hope Kuruvoli and his partner rock the Canes.
1 Go to commentsI wonder what impact Samson has had on their attack, as the team seems less prone to trundle it up the middle, take the tackle and then trundle it up again. I lost faith in the coach last year as the Rebelss looked like a 2nd/3rd rate South African team. I also disliked Gordon standing back, often ignored as the forward battle went on and on. Maybe its our Aussie way of not getting off our A***’s until the enemy is at the gate.
86 Go to commentsThanks for the write up. Great to see the Rebs winning, I am a little interested in how they will go against the remaining kiwi teams, I think they’ve only played Hurricanes and Highlanders but how great to see these players performing!! I also see Parling has a job beyond June 30! A good move by RA? Also how do you fix the Rebels previously scratchy defence?
86 Go to commentsbe smart - go black
14 Go to comments