Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Rugby Australia return to the black but it will only be shortlived as 2019 losses expected and watershed broadcast negotiations loom

By Online Editors
Wallabies captain Michael Hooper leads out team for second half against Italy. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Rugby Australia (Rugby AU) today announced its 2018 results at its Annual General Meeting, held at the Rugby Australia Building in Sydney.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rugby AU recorded a net surplus of $5.2m in 2018 ($3.8m operational deficit in 2017), aided by a $14.9m net expenditure reduction primarily due to reduced funding allocated to Super Rugby, player costs decreasing, and a reduction in administrative staffing and overhead costs.

The organisation experienced a revenue decline of $30.2m and whilst this was primarily due to the absence of a large one-off government grant received last year, matchday revenues and sponsorships declined year-on-year by 23% and 10% respectively.

The largest revenue driver, broadcast revenue, remained largely the same as part of the original multi-year that expires after 2020. Negotiations for the next deal for 2021 and beyond are currently being undertaken.

With astute cost-cutting making up for downward pressure on revenues, Rugby Australia finished with positive operating cash flow and a small net increase in cash on the previous year.

Rugby AU will operate at a loss in 2019 due to reductions in broadcast and match day revenue due to a limited domestic Test schedule due in a Rugby World Cup year while the pivotal broadcast negotiations for the next rights cycle will be a key determining factor in Rugby Australia’s future financial success going forward.

After SANZAAR announced the axing of the Sunwolves, it remains to be seen whether fewer games in a reduced Super Rugby competition will result in lower broadcast revenues. Uncertainty still surrounds the likelihood of World Rugby’s Nations Championship proposal, of which the result will impact Rugby Australia’s future revenues.

ADVERTISEMENT

If the SANZAAR nations decided to boycott future tours to the Northern Hemisphere in protest of the Nations Championship not going ahead, it would also be unclear how they would earn revenue in their own touring windows in June/July.

The uncertainty surrounding the make-up of the global calendar post-2020 adds a certain degree of concern for Rugby Australia, despite this year’s positive results.

Rugby Australia Chairman, Cameron Clyne said: “There are many highlights and achievements from 2018, particularly in community Rugby and those are the result of the dedicated, passionate people within our State and Territory Member Unions and the volunteers that continue to be the strength of our game in driving it forward each year.

“While we have once again experienced significant growth in women’s Rugby, growth in Club XVs for the first time in several years, and substantial growth in Sevens, it is undeniable that the performance of the Qantas Wallabies rightly or wrongly overshadowed some of the other successes of our code.

ADVERTISEMENT

“To achieve our ambitions for the game we need winning teams that can galvanise support from millions of Australians and inspire generations of future players. When this happens, the financial benefits follow, which means there is more money available to invest across the game.

“An extra $1 million was invested into community Rugby in 2018, which saw participation increase across all three formats of the game.

“In 2019, we hope to see more positive results from the implementation of the National High-Performance Plan, after improved performance across the board from our Vodafone Super Rugby teams in the 2018 season. With our professional teams performing better, we will see more opportunities to inspire future players, attract new fans to the game and boost community Rugby funding.”

Against the backdrop of these successes, the Rugby community was also deeply impacted by serious injuries suffered by five schoolboy Rugby players in Queensland and New South Wales. Four student players were injured in four unrelated and dissimilar incidents during the Queensland Great Public Schools (GPS) competition, while a fifth young player suffered a serious spinal injury in NSW State 7s trials in October.

This year, following recommendations from an independent review of these incidents, Rugby AU will implement a Best Practice Safe Rugby Framework that incorporates existing player safety guidelines and introduces trial safety initiatives such as the ‘Front Row Passport’ program and will continue to support those families affected by serious Rugby injuries.

In 2019, Rugby AU will continue its focus on delivering an aligned and integrated National High-Performance Plan with its State and Territory Member Unions to drive more consistent performance across Australia’s professional teams.

Michael Cheika’s interview with RugbyPass:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 26 minutes ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

6 Go to comments
S
Sam T 6 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

4 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 13 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

6 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'It has left a sour taste': Lima Sopoaga hits out at changes in Samoa 'It has left a sour taste': Lima Sopoaga hits out at changes in Samoa
Search