Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Premiership finances in precarious state following report

By Alex Shaw
Rugby generic

According to a report in The Guardian, the state of finances in the Gallagher Premiership are more precarious than ever.

ADVERTISEMENT

Per the report, which is using official financial information from Companies House for the 2016/17 season, Wasps boasted the highest turnover for the campaign, raking in £33.4m, although only £16.2m of that came from the sporting side of the business, with the remaining £17.2m coming from alternate sources, such as venue, business and hotel income.

The club’s wage bill of £17m accounted for 51% of their turnover and was the highest in the Premiership that season, contributing to the club making a loss of £3.7m before tax.

Harlequins’ turnover of £20.7m was the second most but again, a high wage bill (£12.6m – second highest in the competition) contributed to a £6.6m loss before tax. The club was heavily reliant on funding by Mosaic Limited, with rugby income accounting for just £6.5m of the £20.7m turnover, that also included a commercial income of £8m and central funding of £6.1m.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

The third highest turnover belonged to Leicester Tigers, who brought in £19.7m. A wage bill of £12m culminated in a £900k loss before tax, although the redevelopment of Welford Road also factored into their expenditure, so the goal of sustainability is not too far from reality for Tigers.

Bath ended up making a loss of £2.6m before tax and leant heavily on owner Bruce Craig, whose loans to the club now fall just shy of £18m. Their turnover stood at £19m, the fourth highest in the competition, whilst their wage bill of £11m was the fifth highest.

Saracens’ financial statements arguably look the most precarious of all, with £47m owed to investors and shareholders and a wage bill of £11.4m meant that even a healthy turnover of £17.8m was not enough to save the club from a pre-tax loss of £2.8m. Like Bath, Saracens’ ownership is willing to forego short-term sustainability in a bid to maximise commercial opportunities and on-field success, hopefully paving the way to long-term sustainability.

ADVERTISEMENT

One club in perhaps an even more precarious state, given the lack of a benefactor able to subsidise losses, is Worcester Warriors. They made a loss of £8m before tax and their turnover of £10.8m was only the ninth highest in the competition. Furthermore, their wage bill of £11m is the fifth highest in the competition and even exceeds their turnover. They also have £26m in loans from the owner on the books.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Sale Sharks brought up the rear in the turnover stakes, bringing in just £8.3m for the season, although their wage bill was also the smallest at just £6.5m. This meant that club only ended up making a pre-tax loss of £810k for the season.

Northampton Saints had an encouraging turnover of £16.7m but ended up making a loss for the first time since they became a limited company in 2000, with pre-tax losses of £1.2m. One of the key factors behind the loss was an increase in the wage bill, which stood at £10.7m after investments were made to stop the club’s slide down the table.

Gloucester posted very similar financial results to Northampton, with a loss before tax of £1.2m, too, as well as an identical wage bill of £10.7m. Their turnover was slightly less, at £16m.

ADVERTISEMENT

A £3m pre-tax loss for Newcastle Falcons was far from ideal. Their turnover (£9.7m) and wage bill (£7.9m) were the 10th highest in the competition. With rising crowd attendances and improved performances on the field, though, Falcons could be looking up in the coming seasons.

The big success story, though, was Exeter Chiefs, who made a profit before tax of £1.1m, thanks to a tightly controlled wage bill of £9.6m and a respectable turnover of £17m. Exeter do have debts of £13m to pay off, but with sensible management, they are currently doing just that.

Unfortunately, there was no financial information on Bristol Bears.

Love the Gallagher Premiership? Then click here for our new fantasy rugby for the season.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sam T 5 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

4 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 11 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The 124kg 'enforcer' Matfield tips to 'take over' from Etzebeth The 124kg 'enforcer' Matfield tips to 'take over' from Etzebeth
Search