Northern | US

PREM bosses weigh in on England's overseas policy

Montpellier’s English number eight Billy Vunipola is tackled by Toulouse's English flanker Jack Willis (up) and Toulouse's French hooker Peato Mauvaka during the French Top 14 rugby union final between Stade Toulousain (Toulouse) and Montpellier Hérault Rugby (MHR) at the Stade de France in Saint-Denis, on the outskirts of Paris, on June 27, 2026. (Photo by Anne-Christine POUJOULAT / AFP)
Comments
17 Comments

Sale Sharks boss Alex Sanderson says that it would be a disaster for the Gallagher PREM if England lifted its ban on selecting overseas-based players for national duty.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jack Willis jokingly challenged reporters to find a way for him to play international rugby after retaining his crown as the best player in France’s Top 14 on Monday evening.

Toulouse flanker Willis, 29, last played for England at the 2023 Rugby World Cup after being granted dispensation to represent his country while playing his club rugby in France following Wasps’ collapse.

VIDEO

Willis, under contract to Toulouse until 2029, is also open to switching his international allegiance to Andy Farrell’s Ireland if he secures a one-year loan arrangement with any of Ireland’s four provinces.

But Sanderson believes that lifting the ban would be a disaster for PREM clubs and would leave them fighting to compete with one hand tied behind their backs.

Fixture
Gallagher Premiership
Saracens
17 - 21
Full-time
Sale
All Stats and Data

“I just think it would devalue our competition. The PREM is a really good product, with really competitive teams, but it would be too much if players were allowed to take the pay cheque and move to France.

“And then just get the Eurostar over for a bit of training with the international team. I think it’d devastate the Premiership because then players, you know, can literally have the cake and eat it, can’t they?

ADVERTISEMENT

“They can take the pay cheque, and there’ll be no consequence for playing outside the country. I understand the views of those lads who feel otherwise, and we have some in our quarters. Courtney Lawes has mentioned it already.

“I don’t see why that should be the case. I’m looking at it from a different point of view. We wouldn’t be able to compete and to keep them on the books if we had to go against some of the juggernauts in the Top 14,” Sanderson told RugbyPass.

Exeter Chiefs boss Rob Baxter echoed the view, adding that other countries don’t have a problem banning overseas-based players from the national team.

“We’re not going to improve the financial picture of the PREM by saying that players can play for England and go abroad. We’re in danger of wanting everything.

ADVERTISEMENT

“How do you improve the PREM? Well, you need your best players playing in it. So for me, I think it’s just exactly what we have to do. And I know people talk about other models, but some models have no problem with it.

“Ireland doesn’t have a problem with it. New Zealand don’t have a problem with it. You know, we shouldn’t have a problem with it either,” said Baxter.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

17 Comments
T
Timmyboy 6 days ago

All the talks boring. The rules are the rules. It’s a loud minority who want them changed. People who live in England and support their prem club want to see the best English players playing for them. I couldn’t care less about Jack Willis.

He can enjoy his croissants.

L
Lupo 6 days ago

Baxter is wrong. Ireland doesn't have a non-Ireland based selection policy, just those that are in Ireland are heavily favoured over those who are not but does not outright omit them (immediate example is Sexton). In addition, there are questions about this unwritten rule as to how it goes against EU law that Ireland is subject to. There are also growing calls in NZ to open their selection policy to those in Super Rugby and Japan.


Even adopting a one or two foreign based players would be something. This overwhelming fearmongering that the premiership is going to collapse because you allow a few players to play in France or elsewhere is nonsense. The team that suffers in the end is England by omitting players who are actual game winners because they play in Toulouse and not Newcastle.

E
Ed the Duck 6 days ago

Can you cite any other examples beyond sexton? As for eu law, any Irish player trying to use that platform would instantly find themselves in a ‘heads they win, tails you lose’ situation!

G
GS 6 days ago

Alex Sanderson said the players cannot have their cake and eat it….because the prem clubs want that for themselves along with ringfencing and most of the money the national team/RFU generate. As for the “disaster for the prem” he sees, that wont happen because the T14 have Jiff regs that the teams obey. Perhaps if the 10 self centered, ringfenced clubs restricted non EQPs to 3 or 4 per squad some of us would have a bit more sympathy with them as they would appear to actually care about the national squad. As for Mr (as long as its good for Exeter) Baxter saying you improve the Premiership by having your best players in it…well scout them, let them represent their towns and counties, nurture them, bring them through your academies and get rid of the plethora of foreign players you have in your squad

B
B 6 days ago

Surely middle ground can exist and they can put controls in place to ensure it won’t be a mass exodus


The Rugby Players Association has 1000’s of members/players but the top tier of the men’s game only has 10 clubs. It could create the space to develop younger players quicker by creating some more natural space


I don’t see how a handful of players with different experiences playing in different systems would hurt a national team. And in the case of Willis, any player standing out in the Top 14 is special

T
Tom 6 days ago

Its not about how much it would hurt the national team it's about how much it would hurt the PREM. Which in the long run would impact the national team. I do think there could be a middle ground as you say or even just a clause that a coach can choose to pick 1-2 players under exceptional circumstances such as them winning multiple awards for being the best player in the Top 14. Something has to be done to stop JW playing for Ireland. That'd be ridiculous.


But.. I've said it before and I'll say it again - 99% of the noise about England's overseas selection policy is because of Tom and Jack Willis. Had the PREM been in a better state and Wasps not gone bust, no one would even give a sh!t about our selection policy. This is a lot of noise over two players. Yes there are some other names you can throw in the hat but basically it's the Willis brothers that anyone cares about.

J
J Marc 6 days ago

Once again, if English players in top14 were éligible for England, the pay chèque would be a bit lower and going to France should be less interesting….

B
B 6 days ago

Although he chose to end his international career beforehand, Wilkson peaked late career and played his best rugby at club level in France. His game developed hugely because of it

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close