Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Mini Murrayfield' delay is giving SRU boss grey hairs

By Online Editors
An artist impression of what Edinburgh's planned stadium at Murrayfield could look like

The ongoing delay in building a new home for Edinburgh has left exasperated Scottish Rugby Union chief operating officer Dominic McKay “getting grey hairs”.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was 2018 when the SRU secured planning permission off of the City of Edinburgh Council to construct a 7,800-capacity stadium – known as Mini Murrayfield – on the Murrayfield back pitches. However, alleged council red tape has since held up the project. 

Edinburgh confirmed in April that rather than moving into their new stadium for the start of the 2019/20 season, they will continue to play instead at the 67,000-seater national stadium.   

It’s a delay that has deeply frustrated McKay. “I am growing grey hairs as a result of the time it is taking to work through some of the red tape in this city,” said the SRU administrator in a Wednesday report in The Scotsman. “We’ve got a very positive experience through in Glasgow, where we’ve done some great work.”

Scotstoun, where the SRU are tenants of Glasgow Life, has been used by the Warriors since 2012 and plans were recently unveiled to increase its capacity from 8,000 to 12,000.  

“We need them [City of Edinburgh Council] to pull out the stops to make sure we can deliver this facility,” continued McKay about the delay in the Murrayfield project. “We’ve got our planning permission but there are a few bits of red tape to work through, so [it will be] as soon as possible.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There has been progress. Naturally, doing a facility as large as we’re trying to do takes some people a while to get their head around, so we’re working our way through that as fast as we possibly can.

“There is a big backlog at the moment… it’s not a glitch on our side. The thrust of the plans are the same. So, the planning permission we have received is unchanged but, naturally, as you work your way through dialogue and discussion around any sort of facility activity, you will tweak a few things but nothing significant.

Richard Cockerill
Edinburgh head coach Richard Cockerill wants a smaller capacity stadium his team can turn into a fortress (Photo by Mark Runnacles/Getty Images)

“What we are particularly proud about is the importance of delivering for the fans for Edinburgh – we’ve said that for some considerable time – we want to give them a home we can all be proud of.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’ve got the land here, we’ve got the space here, we’ve got the vision and the money to make it happen so, hopefully, we can issue an update in the very near future.”

WATCH: Part one of the two-part RugbyPass documentary on what fans can expect in Japan at this year’s World Cup

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 8 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Bryan Habana: 'Sevens already had its watershed moment when it became an Olympic sport' Bryan Habana: 'Sevens already had its watershed moment when it became an Olympic sport'
Search