Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Match Highlights - NRC Grand Final: Fijian Drua vs Queensland Country

The Fijian Drua have won the 2018 National Rugby Championship after defeating Queensland Country 36 to 26 in the Final at Churchill Park, Lautoka on Saturday afternoon.

ADVERTISEMENT

In front of a packed crowd of 6523 and in torrential conditions, the Drua scored five tries to Queensland Country’s four ensuring the victory and reward after finishing the season as Minor Premiers.

The match started with Queensland Country shooting out of the blocks, but the first half was a constant battle of swinging momentum as the Drua fought their way back.

It was a physical contest between both packs that would define the match, with torrential rain across the day and during the game ensuring that a slippery ball would be in hands for the backs.

The Drua played a patient match, constantly asking questions of Queensland Country’s defence as they attacked from all over the park.

Despite a late charge from Queensland Country in the second half, Fiji Drua held on to their lead, sending the crowd in raptures when the final whistle blew.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rugby Australia General Manager High Performance, Ben Whitaker said: “On behalf of Rugby Australia and the Australian Rugby community I would like to congratulate the Fijian Drua on their victory today.

“Over the course of the NRC season, the Drua played enterprising, exciting Rugby that enthralled and entertained fans in Fiji, around Australia and across the world.

“I know many Drua players have been picked for National Squad duties following on from their performances this season and we wish them well in their endeavours.

“We offer our commiserations to Queensland Country who fought hard today. They have a very young, talented squad and it will be exciting to see how these players develop over the coming years.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Their consistency over the past two seasons in reaching back to back NRC finals will no doubt positively impact the Queensland Reds and Qantas Wallabies over the next few years”.

Fijian Drua 36
Tries: Tuisue 2, Radrodro, Naulago, Veitokani Cons: Waqatabu 4 Pens: Veitokani
Queensland Country 26
Tries: Feauai-Sautia, Petaia, Daugunu, Maafu Cons: Stewart 3

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 12 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed
Search