Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Lower tackle height to be trialled at World Rugby U20s in 2026

Rico Simpson of New Zealand is tackled during the Final of the U20 World Championship between New Zealand and South Africa at Stadio Mario Battaglini on July 19, 2025 in Rovigo, Italy. (Photo by Timothy Rogers/Getty Images)

World Rugby will trial a lower legal tackle height at the sternum during the 2026 World Rugby U20 Championship in Georgia, marking the first time the measure has been tested at elite level.

ADVERTISEMENT

The decision follows two seasons of community trials across 11 unions, which showed changes in player behaviour and reports from some unions of reduced concussion rates over a single season.

Data from the community game indicated an 8 to 10 per cent drop in upright tackles.

The U20 Championship will also trial associated law measures, including sanctions for ball carriers who lead dangerously with the head, permission for double tackles where the first contact is below the sternum, and allowances for pick and go situations close to the line.

VIDEO

World Rugby said the closed competition environment would allow consistent application, focused referee preparation and targeted education for players and officials. The outcomes will be assessed against safety and spectacle metrics before any further elite trials are considered.

World Rugby Chairman Dr Brett Robinson said: “Player welfare is at the heart of everything World Rugby does. We’ll leave no stone left unturned in our efforts to make the game as safe as it can be. Having said that, protecting what makes rugby, rugby is a vital part of my role. We’ll undertake this trial, study it closely to ensure we have a game and a U20 Championship that excites players and fans alike.”

World Rugby Chief Player Welfare and Rugby Services Officer Mark Harrington said “World Rugby has always said that when it comes to player welfare we’ll protect the character of our game and we will always follow the science. The trials so far in the community game have shown some really positive results and we need to look at how we can use that new information to benefit the game as a whole.

“Unions have asked us to trial a lower tackle height at the elite level and the U20 Championship is the best place to begin that journey. It is important to stress that we’re a long, long way from changing the law at the elite level at this point. However, if this and subsequent trials show positive results across all player welfare, player feedback and fan enjoyment perspectives, then as a sport we need to embrace that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Chair of World Rugby’s Men’s High Performance Committee and FFR representative Abdel Benazzi said “Unions, including the FFR, have been keen to explore a lower tackle height in the elite game for some time. Especially after the success we have achieved in our own community game. Through the U20 World Championships we can achieve this without asking most players to play in a variety of environments and many will have grown up with a lower legal tackle height. We look forward to seeing the outcomes next year.”

Related

Rugby’s best of the best, ranked by experts. Check out our list of the Top 100 Men's Rugby Players 2025 and let us know what you think! 



ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
F
FD 45 days ago

They need to prep for the inevitable head contact court case, as it happened with NFL. All of this helps to show they’ve “tried” to sort it out. Everything they do will lower the payout as they’ve “remediated” the issue. They don’t care how it impact the product of the game as that impact the national unions more.

u
unknown 45 days ago

Oh dear - here we go. More tinkering and a further erosion of the game.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
PAUL HEWITT 1 hour ago
'Ireland are consumed by chaos, but Andy Farrell's choice of 10 is becoming clear'

I think that the out-half debate simply misses some key points about what Ireland needs: really quick on his feet and mentally; able to change the plan effectively if the set one isn’t working; good at directing his three quarters; up to the pace against the best opponents; excellent tackling especially in covering. Notice that in these areas Prendergast is simply not there yet: he holds the ball low in the pass and is easily wrapped or dispossessed; he is not hard to read, telegraphing his intentions; his movement is casual and his pace off the mark is not electric; he is rarely quick getting to top speed. Crowley is better in most of these areas. Both are about even in conversion rate success but tend to miss crucial kicks. When measured against Sexton, O’Gara or Humphreys at their best - or even early on - they don’t really come close. Granted that against weaker opposition both have merits, but Byrne would appear to offer most for the French match - although I would start with Crowley. Temperament has to be the decisive factor with France coming up first and so many positions being uncertain up front. None of the provinces would fiil us with huge optimism. Incidentally, it’s easy to say that Aki is past his best, but is not Lowe a liability in defence this season? Third might be the best Ireland can hope for in the Six Nations and Scotland might just pull off a quick one against us to get that place. “What could possibly go wrong???!!!”…

12 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT