Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

James Haskell has revealed the poverty-line salary he was paid playing in New Zealand

By Online Editors
James Haskell of the Highlanders. (Photo by Teaukura Moetaua/Getty Images)

Recently retired England international James Haskell has opened up about all things rugby over his career with The Times, including what drove him to move to New Zealand.

ADVERTISEMENT

Haskell revealed the paltry sum he received to play Super Rugby, saying that it ‘cost me more to play for them’.

“I went to the Highlanders for NZ$20,000 a year. It cost me more to play for them but I went there for the love of the game,” he told The Times.

“I have been all around the world and enjoyed every day of it. You get one chance at life and I wanted to maximise it.”

Had that been the only income Haskell received whilst playing in New Zealand, it would put him below the country’s poverty line. Unicef determined the poverty line for New Zealand at $28,000 or less in household income in 2016.

Haskell played 12 times for the Highlanders over 2012-13 before joining Wasps where he made over 100 appearances before moving to Northampton Saints after the 2017-18 season.

He made 77 caps for England from 2007-19 and was a part of England’s 2011 and 2015 World Cups, of which both didn’t turn out to be satisfying.

“Both World Cups I was a part of turned out to be shambolic and disappointing. I would have liked to have had Eddie Jones coaching me through a World Cup. He would have made it something very different.

“My best games for England were under Eddie. He got the best out of me.

Haskell believes that this England squad has what it takes to win the World Cup but there will always be a part of him that wishes he was a part of it.

“I met Eddie and said I was going to retire. I wanted to thank him and I offered to help the squad if I can. I am more sad because I genuinely believe they can win the World Cup. If they do, 99 percent of me will be very happy. The other one percent will be, like, ‘f…’.”

He believes that for anyone to catch the back-to-back World Champions, a paradigm shift towards skill development is required from other nations instead of the obsession towards size. His only criticism of the game now is the lack of personalities in the game with everything so ‘boring’.

“For the game to evolve and to get to the level of New Zealand, people have to want to pick up a ball first and not weight.”

“Skills are fundamental. As are personalities. That is one criticism I would have of the game now: everything is so sanitised. You can’t say this, do that, offend that person, you must reshoot that photo because it had the wrong mobile phone in, or not ask that question. It is just all boring.

Gregor Townsend names his Scotland World Cup squad:

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Trevor 1 hours ago
Will forgotten Wallabies fit the Joe Schmidt model?

Thanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.

21 Go to comments
B
Bull Shark 5 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Juan Ignacio Brex: 'Italy made history, but it's not enough' Juan Ignacio Brex: 'Italy made history, but it's not enough'
Search