Northern | US

'Would be great': Ronan O'Gara backs rugby to ape football-style rule change

Sky Sports rugby analyst and La Rochelle head coach Ronan O'Gara during the first test match between Australia and the British & Irish Lions at Suncorp Stadium in Brisbane, Australia. (Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)
Comments
8 Comments

La Rochelle head coach Ronan O’Gara has backed rugby union to follow football in changing when the a team line-up is named prior to a game.

ADVERTISEMENT

The norm in football is to keep starting line-ups under wraps until just an hour before kick-off. It’s a practice designed to protect tactical plans and enable late decisions based on weather or the opposition. For coaches, it offers maximum flexibility.

Rugby operates under a more traditional framework.

Team announcements in professional rugby are typically made 48 hours ahead of a fixture, usually on a Thursday for a Saturday Test.

This allows media build-up, fan engagement, and presumably, a form of competitive transparency. But it also hands the opposition time to prepare in detail for a settled XV, leaving little room for late tactical sleight of hand.

Once the team sheet is submitted, there’s little scope for deviation unless injury strikes.

Former England centre Will Greenwood has floated the idea that this approach is ripe for change, suggesting that rugby could benefit from borrowing football’s late reveal culture.

Speaking to Ronan O’Gara on Sky Sports after the British & Irish Lions’ win over a First Nations and Pasifika XV at Marvel Stadium in Melbourne on Tuesday, Greenwood laid out his vision for a modern, flexible model.

“On your question, knowing players now and the psychology of everyone being ready… I don’t think it’s a long time before we go like football and we don’t announce until an hour before kick-off,” Greenwood said. “Then you’ve got 30 players…let’s say it’s chucking it down with rain, you say, ‘I want my two best kick chasers, my best tacklers, my best back three.'”

ADVERTISEMENT

O’Gara, the La Rochelle head honcho and former Ireland fly-half, backed the proposal.

“You can’t, though, with the regulations,” O’Gara noted, “I actually think it’s very interesting.”

Greenwood pushed the point further: “I’m saying I don’t think it’s long before they change that regulation.”

“It would be great,” O’Gara replied.

Asked whether his players could adapt to not knowing the team until an hour before, O’Gara added: “Well, if we practice what we preach all week, everyone is tuned in and, after the first 10 minutes, if you have a Hail Mary, you can easily know on Monday that this guy hasn’t really bought in to what you’re wanting to practice.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cnw 2 hours ago
Rugby's Greatest Rivalry - The stats showcase South Africa's lethal adaptability

I think the issue is much more simple than this. As you know I did not buy into the narrative that Razor was an incompetant coach. I saw real development in terms of clinical structured play. For me the players were struggling with the regimentation needed to play Black Crusader rugby and it imploded in Wellington. London however was an unfortunate confluence of injuries to our key play makers - Roigard and BB - and another brain explosion by Taylor. The failure also to develop a 6-2 bench compounded an energy deficit in the second half. DR threw out the Black Crusader regimentation in favour of his Chiefs, Glasgow and Steelers formula. It has sparked an attacking prowess we have not seen for years - but it has come at the expense of the type of structured % play that Razor was building and brought with it a high error rate. When faced with a well oiled machine like the Boks, who have been fine tuning their systems for several years, the inevitable lack of coherency is exposed. And if we reflect on the losses to Boks on this tour, we can pinpoint “moments” in the game where the Boks systems overwhelmed the ABs. So, one of the key issues with the GVF analysis is that it underestimates the signficance of context of the games and thus overestimates the real difference between the coaches and the players.

Ps to put some stats around this, I have analysed the performance efficiency of the Boks and the ABs for all the NC and GR games. This is based on an aggregate of point per pass / carry and tackle. The AB average is 4.7 and never got higher than 5.8 while the Boks averaged at 6.7 and maxed out at 8.2 in Baltimore. This supports a strong inference that the Boks systems are just inherently more efficient at this time while the ABs are still coming to grips with their new systems. It is not coincidental that the Boks lost with their lowest performance ratio for the tour at 6.4.



...

557 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close