Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'It wasn't just him' - Cheika on axing friend Larkam and 'four or five others'

By Online Editors
Cheika during the Old Mutual Wealth Series match between England and Australia at Twickenham Stadium (Getty Images)

Wallabies coach Michael Cheika admits he may have lost a friend but he had to shrug off the emotion of sacking Stephen Larkham for the good of the team.

ADVERTISEMENT

Larkham, Australia’s attack coach since 2015, was the high-profile fall guy of Rugby Australia’s review of the Wallabies’ worst season in 60 years in 2019.

The Wallabies won just four of 13 Tests, with all the coaching staff including Australia’s 1999 World Cup hero Larkham, in the firing line.

Cheika’s soul-searching over what to do next led to his proposal to axe the former Australian flyhalf, as well as “four or five others”.

Video Spacer

“Tough,” Cheika told an Irish sports podcast in Dublin of his decision to dispense with Larkham.

“For a friend, maybe not anymore, I’m not sure.

“But one thing’s for sure: I don’t blame anyone for anything.”

Crowned world coach of the year in 2015 after teaming with Larkham to take the Wallabies to the final of the last global showpiece, Cheika said he nev er doubted his own ability as Australia’s head coach after last year’s poor performances.

But he asked himself: “What am I going to do?”

“More challenging myself as to what will be the thing I do now to make the change?” Cheika said.

“And after the season I spent a week really detailed, just myself, going through – removing the emotional connections – and going through exactly what I needed to do to make sure that this season was bright and more enjoyable and that we don’t live the peaks and troughs.

ADVERTISEMENT

“(That) we just build and build and build until we get to where we want to go.”

Cheika said he had to balance taking responsibility, protecting people and at the same time “shake it up a little bit”.

“So (it was) very tough but I just think that sometimes you’ve got to make those (decisions). It wasn’t just him,” Cheika said.

“There were four or five others that we made changes to in the team and I’m sure that when we go to the World Cup the team will be in the right position and feeling the right way, partly because of some of those changes of what’s come in and what we’ve needed to change.”

ADVERTISEMENT

AAP

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 2 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year
Search