Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Is Eddie trying too hard?' - Jones' England tactics panned after Paris loss

England's wing Freddie Steward (L) jumps for the ball with France's fullback Melvyn Jaminet (R) during the Six Nations rugby union tournament match between France and England at the Stade de France in Saint-Denis, outside Paris, (Photo by FRANCK FIFE/AFP via Getty Images)

Eddie Jones’ England may have gone down fighting in Paris, but the tactics on show in Saint-Denis haven’t won the Australian any reprieve from the criticism he’s been receiving of late.

ADVERTISEMENT

England fell to a 25 – 13 at the Stade de France.  Despite plenty of resilience from England, their tactics at times appeared to garbled to the casual observer.

England have once again seemed to have run out of ideas in attack – at least any good ones – instead opting to become a kick-heavy team, one that now struggles to cross the whitewash.

Video Spacer

Facing Goliath | A story following Italy as they take on the mighty All Blacks | A Rugby Originals Documentary

Video Spacer

Facing Goliath | A story following Italy as they take on the mighty All Blacks | A Rugby Originals Documentary

Pre-game, many had predicted that England would boot the leather off the ball – and they didn’t disappoint. Flyhalf Marcus Smith repetitively kicking to the out of position Freddie Steward on the wing became a leitmotif for England throughout the ill-fated Six Nations decider in Paris.

Moreover, there’s a sense among many pundits that Jones is trying to be too clever with his tactics.

“Is Eddie trying too hard to be the cleverest guy and ‘innovative’ all the time? So many extra people are in and around camp. What’s the value? I don’t see much,” wrote Mike Brown in his Mail on Sunday column. “The only tactic seemed to kick and hope Steward could get it back!”

“There were also some bizarre calls like cross-kicking to Jamie George on the wing. What is the point in that other than if the player is totally unmarked? Jamie is a great player, but he’s one of the smallest on the field and not good in the air. It wasn’t a good percentage decision.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Brown wasn’t the only one perplexed by England’s tactics.

Journalist Chris Jones questioned the wisdom in using prop Ellis Genge to run the ball back from deep like some sort of 117kg NFL punt returner. “So instead of picking Dombrandt to run those kicks back EJ gets England Rugby’s best scrummager Genge to run himself into the ground. Seems a waste of energy that could be better used.”

“Do you reckon Eddie Jones has said every time we get into or near France’s 22m we must kick it?!” Andy Goode observed wryly.

Commentator and journalist Nick Heath questioned Jones’ use of the bench, or lack thereof. “Eddie Jones in microcosm there. Youngs out on his feet, kept out there, loses concentration and Dupont benefits. Youngs only then replaced with Randall. Stuart Lancaster dreamt of being ahead of the global curve on rugby strategy. Jones is behind the curve on an 80 minute game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Writing in The Rugby Paper, Jeremy Guscott said England’s attack had not evolved under attack coach Martin Gleeson. “England have not threatened enough in attack over the course of the tournament, and it raises important questions.”

Fans were getting in on the action, with one irate Tweeter branding Jones’ approach as ‘pathetic’. “England’s tactics here are frankly pathetic. Pick a big guy on the wing and just boot it up in the air. Then stick the big prop at the back and get him to run straight back in a straight line.
No wonder they barely score any tries.”

https://twitter.com/gordonp93/status/1505280519038193664

Jones has now called for patience as he looks ahead to the World Cup next year. The question is has the RFU’s run out.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 4 hours ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

220 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT