An irreverent and microscopic look at Leinster's secret to success
Terming anything ‘the best’ is usually subjective. It’s a matter of opinion, to be debated and discussed. And yet, the phrase ‘Leinster are the best team in Europe’ is just an indisputable fact.
On their journey to a record-equalling fourth European Cup, Leinster smashed out of the way the English champions, the Pro14 champions, the defending European champions, the Pro14 leaders, the Top14 leaders, and, in the final, a massive bag of money masquerading as a rugby team. Leinster have taken on every challenge presented to them, and passed them all with an array of flying colours that would make Israel Folau dizzy.
On the surface, Leinster should not be as successful as they are. Their captain, Isa Nacewa, is so old even his hair has wrinkles and these days he runs like he has a permanent erection. They’re coached by a team comprising of the man behind the most high-profile coaching failure in rugby history, and a guy with about as much experience being a coach as a bus making its first long-haul journey.
Their squad is mostly made up of boys from the local area, promoted rather than recruited, the same strategy used by the Dragons, which, it goes without saying, is perhaps not the best model to follow.
Except none of these things are actually negatives, because Leinster have always gone with what works, rather than what should work. Nacewa is still putting in man of the match performances between crosswords, the squad just won the Champion’s Cup, and the coaching team was a stroke of low-level genius.
When club legend Leo Cullen, a man with a fish-face that could have saved Guillermo del Toro a fortune in special effects, was appointed head coach of Leinster it stunk of jobs for the boys. However, Cullen’s career paid off: As a player and captain, Leo Cullen was never the star. He was a guy who worked hard and got the best out of those around him, and he’s become the same as a coach.
Somewhere in the step to professionalism, rugby has apparently adopted the auteur theory from French cinema, credit for a side usually goes solely to the head coach. But with Leinster, the thing Cullen deserves most kudos for is building a team who can do their jobs exceptionally well.
In 2016, Cullen appointed Stuart Lancaster. Lancaster is best remembered as the England coach who got them dumped out of their own World Cup in the pool stages. However, people forget everything that happened in the four years prior to that. Lancaster established a team culture and playing style with England that has very much formed the foundations for everything Eddie Jones has since done, and hauled the team back to being respectable from the borderline calamity left behind by Martin Johnson.
The coaching team split responsibilities between them, taking two jobs each: Cullen takes care of the forwards and man-management, Lancaster structures attack and defence. Girvan Dempsey works with the backs, and gets forgotten by the press.
The gameplan is essentially a huge, brutal game of Bop-It, forcing defenders to make decisions quicker and quicker, knowing eventually they’re going to slip up and miss the ‘SLAP IT’ cue. Opposition allowing, Leinster like to play at a faster and faster pace as phases go on, until eventually a defence can’t keep up. Even if they’re reading their pattern play, this doesn’t give them opportunity to get a defensive line set up in time.
Speaking of pattern play, Leinster use dummy runners better than any other club side out there. On any strike move, they invariably have three or four players running off Sexton, who are all able and likely to get the ball, meaning a defence has to watch all the runners, not knowing which are the dummies. You’d wonder how Leinster always seem to have so many, but I figure it must be because Rob Kearney has bought so many dummies down the years they probably have plenty lying around in reserve.
Leinster’s dummy lines are about confusing a defender, putting doubt in their mind. There’s never a right or wrong way to play rugby, no matter what Quade Cooper’s career might suggest, but most teams approach dummy runners incorrectly. Sides such as England and Wales use dummy runners to distract a defence. To prevent them seeing what they’re cooking up on attack.
However, if the runner doesn’t stand a realistic chance of receiving the ball, the whole move is pointless; it’s just someone flapping about in the defender’s peripheral vision. The to-be tackler is already ignoring plenty of them in the crowd. You might as well just put your loosehead in a silly hat and tell them to do the Macarena. An international-standard defence is going to see right through what you’re doing either way.
Leinster’s attack, on the other hand, is built around options. Each player runs lines off the next, meaning even if a defence does read their planned play, Sexton can just select another runner and start a different move. It’s likely the dummy runners are coached to expect the ball just the same as they would if they were part of the plan. If they don’t think they’re a dummy runner themselves, the defence is all the less likely to think so too. In fact, we probably need another name for dummy runners who don’t know they’re dummy runners. I quite like Buzz Lightyear runners.
These Buzz runners continue to occur in every phase, too, not killed after the initial strike move as per most teams. There’s an immaculate attention to detail in all of Leinster’s play, not just the flashy first-phase work you’ll see over and over in slow motion, including in my own videos.
11 – @jameslowenz averaged 87 metres gained per match this season, no player averaged more (Blair Kinghorn also 87); the Kiwi was involved in a try every 61 minutes, the best rate of anyone eligible for this team. Impact. pic.twitter.com/SyGG4dUAul
— OptaJonny (@OptaJonny) June 1, 2018
Every phase is approached as either first-phase, or a chance to set up a new first-phase. Forward drives and carries are varied and pitch-wide, and allow them to generate quick ball and attack off a new position.
Instead of carrying by the guard of the ruck, you’ll often see Leinster spread their pods out. Where possible, they’ll look to carry into players who are not renowned jacklers. Dan Leavy’s break against Saracens (As seen at 7:15 in the video) was a product of him shuffling out wider, to avoid a clump of jackle-happy Sarries. He happened to find space in the process, so when the ball found him, it was straight through the middle.
They’re always good at generating quick ball, but in the European semi-final against the Scarlets, Leinster went through phases faster than Marvel Studios will when they hit full cash-cow mode. The Scarlets normally play a very effective rush defence, charging in on an opposition to reduce their time on the ball. However, as Leinster’s ball was so quick, they couldn’t get into position, never mind actually blast their faces.
On one level, Leinster are just very smart and very good at the basics, but there’s also some fascinating innovation going on. In order to explain this most effectively, I’m first going to go back to those basics, and explain what a breakdown is.
Upon completion of the tackle, the ball carrier has to release the ball and in order to do so, may place it once in any direction, at which point the opposition may try to steal it, prompting the ball carrier’s teammates to go in and protect it. This creates a ruck.
When talking about ball retention, most teams focus on the players clearing out, looking for new techniques to smash. But, to go full secondary school English lesson for a second, let’s look at that ruck description, and ask ourselves: What was the subject of that sentence? It wasn’t the players protecting. It was the ball carrier. So Leinster’s technique for retaining the ball focuses on the ball carrier.
The tactic is very simple. The problem at any breakdown for the team in possession is always a threat nearing the ball. Rather than looking to move the threat, Leinster started to move the ball.
In the example detailed in the video at 5:55, Isa Nacewa is tackled close to the tryline. As he hits the ground, he begins to present the ball as per normal, on the side where he fell. However, the first to the breakdown isn’t one of Nacewa’s nursing home carers, but my personal player of the season, athletic auto-locking octopus, Taigdh Beirne.
Beirne gets into a great body position, and initiates the octo-grapple. However, Nacewa uses his authorised one movement to roll his entire body round and place it on his left, just as Beirne goes for the ball. Beirne’s octopus targeting system is looking left, but because of Nacewa’s roll, he now has to shift his bodyweight to the right side, in which time support has arrived to remove the two of his eight limbs he shows in public.
There’s an argument that this is double movement and therefore illegal, but no referee is going to risk ruining the flow of the game by penalising it. By exploiting this technicality, Leinster have found a way to deny a player like Beirne or James Davies the half-second they need to steal the ball.
They have continued to deploy this tactic throughout the close-season. Whilst they will use it in tight, it’s used primarily out wide, by Leinster’s outside backs. It allows them to buy an extra second, even if they jackling threat is only a winger, when the player feels they are on their own. It’s possible other teams do this too, but Leinster are the first I’ve noticed employ it as a deliberate and identifiable tactic.
Ball retention is at the heart of Leinster’s attack. This season, Saracens, Scarlets and at times Munster all struggled to deal with the way Leinster shift the point of focus at such speed. If you can retain your ball at the pace Leinster do, it gives you complete control of the game. They can continue to move at a million miles an hour, or they can use the fact the ball is already secured and slow things right down.
Their ability to attack with dummy runners phase after phase is born from the belief they have that they’ll keep hold of the ball. You can run the most complex backs pattern in the world, but it’s a fat lot of good if you lose the ball the next phase because nobody was there to clear out. Their team have a rugby articulacy that allows them to use their skills to their full potential.
This allows, in turn, them to use the incredibly accurate kicking games of halfbacks Luke McGrath and Jonathan Sexton. When in the opposition half, Leinster are happy to keep hold of the ball until something opens itself up. However, except for in desperate, own-tryline circumstances, Leinster tend to make sure each kick is contestable. The old adage goes ‘The kick is only as good as the chase’, and the collective members of Leinster’s back three tend to make sure the kick looks pretty bloody excellent. This allows them to either shut down any counter attack (Especially useful against a side such as the Scarlets who thrive on it), or win the ball back.
Leinster have as close to a complete game as you’ll find in Europe, and it’s all built on the speed of their ruck ball. They’ve played two finals in the last month, and they’ve won two finals in the last month. And yet, they won both in very different manners: One a tight game thanks to territorial control late on, and one a free-flowing encounter where they scored five tries. However, their ability to win in different ways all comes back to their proficiency at the breakdown. Their ability not just to win their own ball, but to win it quickly, quicker than anyone else.
If, like Racing, you’re up against a solid defence you can’t break down no matter what, you’ve given yourself all the tools to beat it regardless. It takes a lot to be the best team in Europe, but Leinster have managed to build a game involving a lot around not a great deal at all.
Comments on RugbyPass
What was the excuse for the other knockout blowouts then? Does the result not prove the Saints were just so much better? Wise call to put your eggs in one basket when you’ve got 2 comps simultaneously finishing.
28 Go to commentsReally hope Kuruvoli and his partner rock the Canes.
1 Go to commentsI wonder what impact Samson has had on their attack, as the team seems less prone to trundle it up the middle, take the tackle and then trundle it up again. I lost faith in the coach last year as the Rebelss looked like a 2nd/3rd rate South African team. I also disliked Gordon standing back, often ignored as the forward battle went on and on. Maybe its our Aussie way of not getting off our A***’s until the enemy is at the gate.
83 Go to commentsThanks for the write up. Great to see the Rebs winning, I am a little interested in how they will go against the remaining kiwi teams, I think they’ve only played Hurricanes and Highlanders but how great to see these players performing!! I also see Parling has a job beyond June 30! A good move by RA? Also how do you fix the Rebels previously scratchy defence?
83 Go to commentsbe smart - go black
13 Go to commentsNext week the Crusaders hopefully have Scott Barrett back. Will be great to have the captain back. Hopefully he will be the All Black captain as well.
12 Go to commentsExciting place to be for the young fella. I expected he was French Polynesian when I saw him included in the France 6N squad (after seeing him in NZs), and therefor be strong grounds we might loose him to rugby down here. Good, in that he is good enough to warrant such a profile, and from a journalism’s fan interaction aspect, to finally get a back ground story on the fella. Hope he has settled into NZ OK and that at least one rugby country will fit with him to help his development, which, if so, he should surely continue for a few years, and then that he can experience France to it’s fullest with a bit more maturity and less reliance on family than you would have at his current age. A good 3 or 4 years before he would be ready for International duty if he wanted to wait. Of course he already sounds good enough to accept a call up, and to cap himself, in the more immediate future (he’d have to be very very good in the case of the ABs), and he’ll get a great taste of that being with the Canes who have a bunch who are just a few years further into their career and looking likely Internationals themselves.
13 Go to commentsI remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.
4 Go to commentsOh wow… “But as La Rochelle proved in winning in Cape Town this season, a cross-continental away assignment need not spell the end of days.” La Rochelle actually proved quite the opposite. After traveling to Cape town and back they (back-to-back and current champs) got mercilessly thumped the next week. If travel is not the reason, why else would a full-strength powerhouse like La Rochelle get dumped on their @r$e$ one week later?
28 Go to commentsYou know he can land a winning conversion after the full time siren is up. (Even if it takes two attempts.)
5 Go to commentsA very insightful article from Jake. I would love to know how South African’s feel about their move to Europe. Do you prefer playing in Europe or want to go back to Super Rugby?
4 Go to commentspure fire
1 Go to commentsA very well thought out summary of all the relevant complications…agree with your ”refer the Cricket Test versus 20/20 comparison”. More also definitely doesn't necessarily mean better!
4 Go to commentsMust be something when you are only 19 y.o and both NZ and France want you. Btw he wasn’t the only new caledonian in french U20 as Robin Couly also lived in Noumea until 17. Hope he’s successful wherever he chooses to play.
13 Go to comments“Several key players in the Stade Rochelais squad are in their thirties” South Africans are going to hate the implications of that comment!
5 Go to commentsI know Leinster did a job on La Roche but shortly after HT Leinster were 30-13 ahead of them and at a similar time Toulouse were trailing Exeter. At 60 mins Leinster were 27 ahead but after 67 mins Toulouse were only 19 ahead before Exeter collapsed. That’s heavier scoring by Leinster against the Champions. I think people are looking at Toulouses total a little too much. I also think Northhampton are in with a real chance, albeit I’d put Leinster as favourites. If Leinster make the final I expect them to win by more than ten and with control.
5 Go to commentsHey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂
5 Go to commentsNot sure exactly what went wrong for him at Glasgow but it’s pretty clear he ain’t Franco’s cup of tea. Suspect he would have been better served heading out of Scotland around the same time as Finn, Hoggy and Jonny!
1 Go to commentsBulls disrespected the Northampton supporters and the competition. Decide quickly, fully in or out.
28 Go to commentsI wonder if Parling was ever on England’s radar as a coach? Obviously Borthwick is a great lineout coach, but I do worry he might be taking on too much as both head coach and forwards coach.
1 Go to comments