Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Harlequins' new identity is beginning to emerge under Gustard

By Alex Shaw
Harlequins Head of Rugby, Paul Gustard (Photo by Steve Bardens/Getty Images for Harlequins)

Not too many saw Harlequins’ 28-26 victory over Exeter Chiefs on Friday night coming.

ADVERTISEMENT

Exeter had, before their visit to the Stoop, enjoyed a clean sweep of eight wins to start the domestic season and whilst not all of those games were emphatic, runaway victories, the side from the south-west had been mastering the art of securing narrow wins when playing well below their ability.

With a number of internationals, like Henry Slade and Ben Moon, rested, Santiago Cordero given the night off and the injured trio of Sam Simmonds, Jack Nowell and Jonny Hill all also missing, there was no denying it was an understrength side. That said, with players like Nic White, Don Armand and Matt Kvesic involved, it was still a group more than capable of getting a result, and the consensus pre-match seemed to be that that is what they would do. Go to the Stoop, pick up the four points and then welcome back some key players ahead of the European double header.

Quins were not in a generous mood, however, and, even with their fair share of missing players, such as Chris Robshaw, James Horwill and Tim Visser, turned the tables on Exeter and put down their greatest marker yet as to the kind of team they are developing into under new Head of Rugby Paul Gustard.

The London side have been in decline for a few seasons now and though there has been particular focus on the defensive and set-piece issues, their once-famed attack has also had its fair share of problems. Alongside Gustard, Alex Codling was brought in to help with the set-piece frailties, whilst Nick Evans was entrusted to turn around an attack that had lost its keen edge. On Friday night, there was a significant endorsement of all three.

Starting with the defence, offering up 26 points might not seem great on paper, especially with the concession of four tries, but it was an aggressive defensive performance that took risks and helped lay a foundation for the attack.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ian Whitten’s last-minute intercept try was a loss of focus once the game had already been won. Not acceptable, but also forgivable and something which can be worked on, rather than a systemic issue in the club’s defence.

What was really impressive was the line-speed in the midfield and wide channels from Quins, who were frequently able to get up and shut down the width on offer to Exeter, forcing the play back inside. With the exception of Whitten’s intercept and one incisive counter-attack he launched, Exeter’s midfield was kept quiet throughout in regular phase play.

Gabriel Ibitoye of Harlequins takes on the Exeter Chiefs defence during the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Harlequins and Exeter Chiefs at Twickenham Stoop. (Photo by Steve Bardens/Getty Images for Harlequins)

The set-piece chugged along nicely, with Quins securing the ball on all of their lineouts and scrums, usually comfortably, with the opportunity for quick ball off the top or from the base. A misfiring lineout has been one of, if not the club’s most prominent Achilles’ heel in recent seasons and efficiency of the unit on Friday night, if a sign of things to come, bodes very well for the side.

ADVERTISEMENT

And finally, the attack.

Quins have always had a reputation for playing attractive, incisive, fast-flowing rugby, but that reputation has been running on fumes over the last couple of years, with the odd moment of magic reminding everyone what they are capable of, but also highlighting what they were not showing week in, week out in the Premiership and European competition.

On Friday, Quins were fizzing. They kept phases alive, offloading seven times more than Exeter did, in order to stretch defences and create space, which they then exploited with their bevvy of dangerous runners in their back line and back row. There was thought and skill in everything Quins were doing in attack and that allowed them to play a more open, threatening and, admittedly, risky style.

The eagerness to avoid contact, which can be as simple as running at the space just adjacent to a defender, rather than into the chest of a tackler, was helping them win collisions and once that battle was won, it was a much simpler process to free the hands and get the offloads away.

There are not many teams that can run Exeter about and impose an intensity on a game that the Devon-based side struggle to live with, but that’s just what happened at the Stoop.

There are plenty of work-ons from Quins, including a penalty count which again reached double figures and, most importantly, the consistency to replicate this performance for three or four games in a row, but the identity of what they are trying to become under Gustard certainly looks to be bedding in.

With players bigger, faster and fitter than ever before, space is the great premium in rugby, with the pitches not getting larger to account for these freakish athletes the game is now producing. If you have an attack that can stretch a defence and create space, and a defence that shuts down the space, then you are on a promising path for future success.

Watch: Francis Saili chats in the preseason about Quins’ 2017/18 campaign and his hopes for this season.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 11 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING England seek out overthrown head coach to spark attack England seek out forgotten head coach to spark attack
Search