Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Gatland hints at solution to Rhys Webb saga

By Iain Strachan
Rhys Webb playing for Wales

Warren Gatland is disappointed to lose the services of Rhys Webb due to a change in selection policy but hopes “common sense would prevail” if an injury crisis left Wales short of options at scrum-half ahead of the Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Welsh Rugby Union (WRU) and Welsh regions have adopted a new policy requiring players to have amassed 60 caps or more if they are to remain eligible for national team duty while based at clubs outside of the country.

Webb, who has only 28 national team appearances to his name, agreed a switch to Toulon earlier this month, prior to the change in regulations which will now render him unable to play for his country.

Gatland has called up the outgoing Ospreys player for the internationals against Australia, Georgia, New Zealand and South Africa.

And the coach appears to remain hopeful that an exception can be made in the future to allow the British and Irish Lions player to return to the fold.

“He’s available for us at the moment and it’s disappointing from my perspective that he’s not going to be available potentially for selection for the World Cup,” Gatland told a news conference.

“There’s been a policy change where unfortunately Rhys Webb has been the one affected. But is the policy better than the one we had before?

ADVERTISEMENT

“Absolutely, because if you looked at what was there we would have only been able to pick two wildcard players before the World Cup from a lot of players, potentially [Taulupe] Faletau, Webb, [George] North, [Dan] Biggar, Liam Williams and maybe a couple of others.

“Now those are available apart from Rhys Webb. He’s been captured but there’s a lot of water to go under the bridge between now and the next 12 months. You never know what will happen with injuries and going to Toulon.

“I wasn’t involved in the discussions between the regions and the union. I was consulted about the number in terms of the caps. The regions were pushing for a 70-cap limit and I personally felt that was too high, so I was involved in discussions over the cap limit. But I was not involved in discussions when it came to agreeing this policy.”

Asked if a clause had been put in place that could potentially make Webb eligible in an exceptional circumstance, the New Zealander replied: “No. You’d like to think that if the situation came to a head, common sense would prevail and you would be able to do something. But at the moment we don’t have a policy like that.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are trying to make it as clear and black and white as we can. If there was a crisis at scrum-half you’d like to think common sense would prevail and people would allow that situation to evolve. But at this stage I don’t know what would happen.

“We are at the mercy of other people agreeing to something like that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 14 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

19 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How are Australian sides faring in Super Rugby Pacific? How are Australian sides faring in Super Rugby Pacific?
Search