1
Five players found guilty, sentenced up to 14 years in prison
By AFP
Three former Grenoble rugby players were sentenced on Friday to 12 to 14 years in prison for raping a young woman in 2017 in Bordeaux after a very drunken evening following a Top 14 match.
ADVERTISEMENT
After two weeks of closed-door trial and more than nine hours of deliberation, Irishman Denis Coulson and Frenchman Loick Jammes were sentenced to 14 years in prison, and New Zealander Rory Grice to 12 years.
These convictions were in accordance with the attorney general’s requisitions. The charge of ‘gang rape’ they were accused was punishable by 20 years of imprisonment.
Lawyers for the three men have announced their intention to appeal and to file a request for release as soon as possible.
Corinne Dreyfus-Schmidt, lawyer for the 30-year-old Irishman who now works in construction, said she was “extremely shocked” by the verdict.
“The court did not take into account the fact that the events took place seven years ago, that my client was 22 at the time and that he had not served a single day in prison. What is the interest for society in sentencing him to 14 years? None, except to ruin a life,” she said.
One of Jammes’ lawyers, Jean-Felix Luciani, also denounced “unjust sentences of a severity that is certainly evident, but which remain sentences of first instance”.
ADVERTISEMENT
“This evening, we sent a message, we told a victim that we believe her… We told these boys that they did not have the right to do what they did to the victim,” reacted Gregoire Mouly, the victim’s lawyer.
“This sends a very strong signal to the men of this country, to the world of rugby, and to women too. Ladies, you can dress as you want, drink as much as you want, this freedom is priceless, even if we wanted to call it into question,” declared another lawyer for the victim, Gaessy Gros.
Unlike Coulson, Jammes (30) and Grice (34) still play rugby, the first at Aix-en-Provence and the second at Oyonnax, two Pro D2 clubs.
The Gironde court also sentenced Irishman Chris Farrell (31), who also plays for Oyonnax, to four years in prison, two of which were suspended, and New Zealander Dylan Hayes (30), now unemployed, to two years suspended, for having witnessed all or part of the events without intervening.
ADVERTISEMENT
On the morning of March 12, 2017, the victim, then aged 20, left in tears a hotel in Merignac, on the outskirts of Bordeaux where the Grenoble team had stayed after its defeat against Union Bordeaux-Begles.
The student had filed a complaint, stating that she had met players in a bar and followed them to a nightclub during a very alcoholic evening, without remembering what happened next. She added that she had woken up the next day, naked on a bed surrounded by two naked men and others who were dressed.
Coulson, Jammes and Grice admitted to having had sexual relations with the young woman but maintained from the beginning that she consented, even taking the initiative, a version maintained at the trial.
This verdict comes three days after a court in Argentina dismissed the case for aggravated rape involving two French internationals, Oscar Jegou and Hugo Auradou.
Rugby’s best of the best, ranked by experts. Check out our list of the Top 100 Men's Rugby Players and let us know what you think!
Curious what the evidence is that she didn't consent? I understand alcohol effecting the inability to consent but if they were drunk too, then that gets tricky. Again, just curious what the evidence is, if there was strong evidence that they forcibly raped her then yeah, 14 years is actually too little. I just get a little wary if the standard is, "alcohol negates consent," because if they were all drunk then it's a bit of a grey area isn't it? I mean, how come drunk men can consent but drunk women can't, for instance? Based on their attorney's objections to them going to prison though (which don't seem to be based on maintained innocence) then I'd have to imagine there was other evidence of forcible rape.
EDIT:
Just read more evidence of how the woman appeared to go in and out of consciousness and was on video trying to leave the group in the hotel lobby and being prevented from doing so. So yeah, I'd say that's pretty clear evidence. They all got off lucky in that case.
during the trial, the victim's lawyer stated that she was not in ability to consent. she was in a state where she needed to be helped and not raped.
"The court did not take into account the fact that the events took place seven years ago, that my client was 22 at the time and that he had not served a single day in prison"
eh? so if someone has already been to prison its fine to keep sending them back, but if someone hasn't been, it isn't?