Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Farrell and Itoje unimpressed with England omission

Maro Itoje and Owen Farrell in action for Saracens

Eddie Jones revealed Owen Farrell and Maro Itoje “hated” being rested for England’s clash with Argentina on Saturday but said they must accept “I run the team”.

ADVERTISEMENT

British and Irish Lions duo Farrell and Itoje will play no part in the Six Nations champions’ first autumn international due to their “exceptional workloads” this season.

England head coach Jones said the Saracens men were not impressed with being given a weekend off, but is adamant it is in their best interests.

“They hate it, which is a great reaction. They hate it because they want to play every Test,” said the canny Australian.

“They are proud of playing for England and they want to be part of a winning team. We have got to convince them that it is in their best interests for this period of time.

“They’ve had exceptional workloads. They’ve played all three [Lions] Tests, played consistently for their clubs, played consistently for us and we feel it’s in their best interests to do some conditioning work.

“They have got to understand I run the team. I make the decisions. It comes down to my gut feeling for what they need.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s a bit like being a horse trainer. You get all this information but you’ve got to look at the person and see what they are ready to do.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT