Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

EPCR takes steps to Brexit-proof UK players before Champions Cup quarter-finals

EPCR Champions Cup flag (Getty Images)

Champions Cup organisers EPCR have fired a pre-emptive Brexit strike, insisting the British deadline for leaving the European Union won’t cause its tournaments regulatory chaos before their completion this season.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Friday, March 29, date for Britain to quit Europe coincides with the Champions and Challenge Cup quarter-finals weekend.

However, six weeks before those matches are due to be played, EPCR have finally reassured the clubs which have qualified for the knockout stages that a registered player who is a citizen of the United Kingdom will be considered as a European player for the purposes of the tournaments as far as the remainder of the 2018/19 season is concerned.

EPCR have also stated they are considering a number of minor rule changes which would resolve the issue of the European player status for future seasons and overcome any further potential regulatory issues posed by Brexit and the UK separation from the European Union.

Quarter-final weekend in the Champions Cup will also see a quick evaluation of what, if any, implications Brexit has on the UK border.

Ulster are due to bring around 12,500 supporters with them from Northern Ireland to Dublin for their sold-out March 30 clash with defending champions Leinster in Dublin, while Munster are Edinburgh-bound that same day.

In the Challenge Cup, Irish side Connacht are due to play at Sale Sharks on Brexit Day, with French duo La Rochelle and Clermont respectively hosting English pair Bristol and Northampton two days later in France.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, EPCR are looking at Murrayfield as the venue to stage a potential all-Scottish Champions Cup semi-final, while the Paris La Défense Arena, which is the new home of Racing 92, is being viewed as a potential venue if the French club beat Toulouse and secure a last-four match against either Leinster or Ulster.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 11 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.' 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.'
Search