Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

England to enter Rugby’s sixth ever ‘Group of Death’

Eddie Jones saw something in Robshaw /Getty

And so it is England who once again will take their place in a Rugby World Cup ‘group of death’. Drawn alongside 2011 finalists France and perennial World Cup dark horses Argentina in Pool C at the Kyoto State Guest House in Japan, Eddie Jones will be seeking to avoid the calamitous early exit England suffered at their home competition two years ago.

ADVERTISEMENT

France, though not the heavyweights of yesteryear, are steadily improving season on season, while Argentina have a knack for arriving at a World Cup in their best form for four years. An interesting subtext will now be England’s summer tour to Argentina, which will inevitably take on extra emphasis, as will their meetings with the French ahead of the competition. But where exactly does the phrase ‘group of death’ come from? And how did it become so commonplace in rugby?

The ‘group of death’, one of the oldest clichés in a journalist’s handbook. A platitude of the profession, and in many ways quite a trite expression. But yet it is the unique degree of truism married with such a phrase that has seen it stand the test of time.

Originating from the 1970 football World Cup in Mexico, it was a set of Mexican sports journalists who first christened a sporting pool a ‘group of death’, or Grupo de la muerte as then reported, applying it to Group 3 which contained reigning World Cup champions England, subsequent winners Brazil and the runners-up from the 1962 Chile World Cup Czechoslovakia. Romania made up the fourth team.

In rugby union’s eight World Cups to date, five specific pools have been labelled a ‘group of death’, though its first utterance did not arise until the third edition of the sport’s showpiece in 1995.

Rugby’s first and second World Cups in 1987 and 1991 were shorn of the Springboks as a result of the international sports boycott due to apartheid, while Western Samoa, as it was then known, were controversially left off the invitation list in 1987. Consequently, no such group tag was forthcoming at either tournament.

The same Western Samoan side ignored in 1987 would sensationally go on to knock out Wales, third-place finishers in 1987, at the pool stages in 1991, beating them 16-13 in Cardiff. A result crucial to the phrase’s emergence in rugby four years later.

ADVERTISEMENT

The marked South Africa’s first involvement, as they hosted the competition in the wake of negotiations to end apartheid. Having been drawn in Pool A alongside reigning champions Australia, as well as minnows Canada and Romania, some sections had dubbed it the ‘group of death’. Something England skipper Will Carling was not going to let lie.

Paired with Wales’ 1991 conquerors Western Samoa, Carling insisted to Australia’s Herald Sun in May 1995 that England’s Pool B alongside the Samoans, Italy and Argentina was the true ‘group of death’, rather than the section containing the Wallabies and Springboks which had already been given that striking tag. Rugby’s relationship with the idiom was off and running.

That Samoan side of 20 odd years ago was one infinitely stronger than the one we watch today. A year out from the World Cup, they destroyed Wales 34-9 in Moamoa to back up their history defining 1991 victory over the Welsh, while at the tournament they put 42 points on Italy and 32 on Argentina. Italian and Argentinian sides England scraped by with one score victories in the same pool.

The Samoans would also travel to Dublin in November 1996 following the World Cup in 1995, and beat Ireland 40-25 at Lansdowne Road. All results unfeasible in today’s current standings. Indeed, Samoa are currently ranked 14th in the world, behind the likes of Fiji, Japan, Georgia and Tonga. They have yet to even formally qualify for the 2019 World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even so though, when looked at in actuality, neither Pool A nor B from the 1995 World Cup were really, truly groups of death. All four parties, South Africa, Australia, England and Western Samoa qualified for the quarter-finals and so the phrase was somewhat erroneously used in its first instance.

The next time it would rear its head would be eight years later following the draw for the 2003 World Cup in Australia.

In 1999 rugby had held its first World Cup under the banner of professionalism, and Argentina, improving all the time, had begun a trend which continues to the present of seemingly peaking just in time for each World Cup. Ireland were to be (not for the first time as it turned out) their first major victim as a quarter-final playoff against the Puma’s in Lens saw Warren Gatland’s side exit early.

Leading up to 2003, Argentina had beaten Ireland again, France twice, and an England XV, while New Zealand and South Africa had both had to sneak injury-time victories on Argentinian soil.

Accordingly, Pool A at the 2003 World Cup containing hosts and reigning champions Australia, Ireland and Argentina was widely labelled as the ‘group of death’ in the media.

Eventual finalists Australia would comfortably see off Argentina in the opening game of the tournament in Sydney, but the two other encounters between the three nations were incredibly close affairs.

Ireland faced Argentina in their penultimate group game in Adelaide, aware that victory would confirm their passage to the knock-out stage. And courtesy of an Alan Quinlan try, for which he dislocated his shoulder while scoring, they squeaked home 16-15 to knock the Puma’s out and turn the tables from four years earlier.

The Irish would lose out by a point to Australia in a showdown for top spot a week later and face a quarter-final with France rather than Scotland, as they were duly dumped out at the quarter-final stage once again. Argentina would never again suffer a group stage exit.

Four years later and it would be same again in France for the 2007 World Cup, as the hosts were joined by a then high-flying Ireland and the exciting Argies in Pool D.

Once more it was the standout pool of difficulty, and predictably termed so via that old chestnut. You know the one by now.

Argentina had customarily peaked ahead of the tournament and played some breath-taking rugby. Laced with quality in their back division, the likes of Agustin Pichot, Juan Martin Hernandez and Felipe Contepomi had proved fearsomely difficult to handle, while young stars such as Juan Martin Fernandez Lobbe and Horacio Agulla were breaking out and making their mark.

As such, Marcelo Loffreda’s Puma’s stunned France in their opening game at the Stade de France, and would batter Ireland at the Parc des Princes in their last game to safely top the pool.

When France met Ireland in the third round of pool games, defeat for either of the pre-tournament favourites would put the other in a perilous position. France comprehensively won it and nine days later Ireland were packing their bags home.

Eddie O’Sullivan’s so-called ‘golden generation’ had come within two minutes of a Grand Slam in the previous Six Nations, and gone the Autumn unbeaten against South Africa and Australia, but alas the 2007 ‘group of death’ swallowed them whole.

Fast forward eight years and we found the hosts England and the third and fourth-placed teams from 2011, Australia and Wales in Pool A at the 2015 Rugby World Cup.

Wales slipping from the top eight seeds in the world ahead of the draw two years before the World Cup had accommodated such a situation, which Warren Gatland charmingly titled the ‘group of hell’. A variation on the theme.

England went into the World Cup talking of winning it, as is also fairly predictable and habitual, but two weeks later they were out, as a free-flowing Australia team and an injury-ravaged but spirited Welsh bunch each defeated them in Twickenham.

In doing so, England became the first host nation ever to suffer a pool stage exit in the history of the competition, with the coaching team of Stuart Lancaster, Graham Rowntree and Andy Farrell all axed following its disastrous conclusion.

And so it is onward to Japan in two years’ time, where either England will suffer unthinkable back-to-back group stage exits, France will be knocked out in the pools for the first time in their history or twice semi-finalists Argentina will buck their tournament trend and exit at that stage for the first time for 16 years. It should make for compelling viewing.

Watch every match of the Lions Tour of NZ streaming live on rugbypass.com, home of the best online rugby coverage including news, highlights, previews & reviews, live scores, and more!

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 2 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
S
Sam T 8 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

7 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 15 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

11 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The 124kg 'enforcer' Matfield tips to 'take over' from Etzebeth The 124kg 'enforcer' Matfield tips to 'take over' from Etzebeth
Search