Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Dagg commits to All Blacks

New Zealand back Israel Dagg

Israel Dagg has snubbed lucrative offers from overseas by signing a new contract with New Zealand Rugby until 2019.

ADVERTISEMENT

Toulon and Leinster were among the clubs reported to be eager to lure Dagg to Europe, but the brilliant Crusaders outside back will remain in his homeland.

Dagg’s decision to commit to the All Blacks comes less than a week after Ben Smith rejected overtures from abroad to commit to the All Blacks and Highlanders.

New Zealand head coach Steve Hansen stated last year that it would be a positive outcome for the word champions if two of Dagg, Smith and Aaron Cruden signed new contracts and the latter is the only one of the trio to move on – agreeing to join Montpellier at the end of the Super Rugby season.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There’s no doubt that there were some attractive offers to consider, but at the end of the day I love my life here in New Zealand with my family, friends and team-mates and I’m not ready to give that up.” said Dagg.

“I still feel blessed every time I pull on the jersey for the All Blacks, Crusaders or Magpies so I consider it an honour to be able to keep working hard to earn that right for the next three years.”

Hansen said: “To have a player of Israel’s ability and versatility re-sign is a major lift for all levels of New Zealand Rugby.

“We appreciate the decision Izzy and his wife Daisy have made and to be able to plan the future, knowing that we’ll have him involved makes life so much easier for us all, and we look forward to the challenges ahead.”

Dagg has scored 24 tries in 61 Tests for the All Blacks since making his debut against Ireland in 2010.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

284 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT