Blindsided: Is No. 6 the All Blacks' biggest World Cup question mark?
All Black loose forward Liam Squire’s 2018 campaign didn’t end how he or head coach Steve Hansen might have hoped.
The grip Squire holds on the All Blacks’ number six jersey may be slipping on the back of two almost-absent outings that saw the flanker play a role far-removed from the one that earned him national selection in the first place.
Traditionally the All Black blindside role has been filled by a bruising enforcer. The likes of Jerome Kaino and the late Jerry Collins held the position for extended periods of time, and made a lasting impact on the game with thunderous carries and bone-rattling hits.
After Kaino’s departure Squire inherited the starting role, but has failed to make the same impact despite his physical similarities and Super Rugby form. Squire, described by Hansen as a ‘physical beast’ fits the bill on paper, matching Kaino for height at 1.96m and carrying more bulk than both Kaino and Collins at 113kg.
Before a knee injury against Ireland last weekend cut Squire’s November tour short – another setback after thumb and shoulder injuries have kept him off the park in 2018 – the loose forward had failed to make his mark on the tour with his physical gifts wasting away in passenger-like performances.
Mostly playing in a support role, Squire often found himself around the action but rarely in it. The role he has played within Steve Hansen’s attack has neutralised his ability to affect the game.
In the All Blacks’ most recent outings Squire has operated mainly as a tip ball option within a pod, limiting his opportunities with ball in hand. When given the opportunity – usually in the middle of the park – he hasn’t been able to find breathing room and has either been forced to straighten – often failing to look outside as well – or sent backwards. Where he has thrived in the past – and made his name – is as an edge runner in space, a role now commonly filled by the All Black hooker.
Against Ireland Squire notched five carries for two metres and made three tackles before being replaced by Scott Barrett after 31 minutes. Against England a week earlier he failed to chalk up a running metre from three carries and made five tackles in a 51 minute shift – not the kind of numbers you would expect from an All Black loose forward.
This stagnant production could come down to a number of things, including Squire simply performing his role. It could also mean that he just isn’t the answer on the side of the scrum.
With other athletic loose forwards like Shannon Frizell and Vaea Fifita in the frame and Scott Barrett making an impact in the blindside role with more frequency, further experimentation will be required as the All Blacks try to lock down their man for the 2019 Rugby World Cup.
Blindside flanker is arguably the most open position in the team, and Squire’s durability – he has started 40 of a possible 95 matches for both the Highlanders and All Blacks in the last three seasons – has opened the door for Highlanders teammate Frizell who shone in the number six jersey in their respective starts earlier this year.
24-year-old Frizell was a star in two of his test starts – both against Argentina – racking up 37 tackles with just three misses in 147 minutes of action. Aside from his first test start where he notched 63 run metres, made three clean breaks, beat five defenders and scored a try he has been limited offensively, but still gotten through plenty of work on the defensive end. The limited attacking production could signal that the role within the system has simply changed.
Perhaps a quality run against Italy would have helped Squire regain some form and give selectors some more confidence, but injury meant 26-year-old Fifita earned a start at blindside in the All Blacks’ final test of the year. Fifita made a strong impression of his own in a 66-3 thrashing in Rome. The Hurricanes back rower carried four times for 50 metres, converted half of his carries into line breaks and beat three defenders. On the defensive end, he topped the All Blacks in tackles with 12 and didn’t miss once. He was edged only by Italian openside Jake Polledri, who made 15 but missed four.
While the games against Argentina and Italy didn’t match the intensity or competitiveness of Squire’s starts against Ireland and England, Fifita and Frizell’s game-breaking efforts can’t be ignored. Fifita still saw a limited amount of ball against Italy and Frizell didn’t get many touches in his second crack at Argentina – which supports the theory that a change in role is what has limited Squire’s involvement on the offensive side of the ball – but both displayed a dangerous ability with both ball in hand and made sure they impacted the game on the other side of the ball.
While he offers a point of difference as an elite jumper with the ability to cover number eight – Frizell and Fifita are better suited as blindsides that can cover lock – Squire simply hasn’t looked hasn’t looked anything like the dynamic ball-carrier we have seen in the past, or the tenacious defender we have grown accustomed to in 2018. Those points of difference may not be enough to secure his place if he can’t get more involved in 2019.
While the jersey will likely remain Squire’s to lose entering next year, a strong Super Rugby season from Frizell or Fifita could push the 27-year-old out of the World Cup frame unless he opens some eyes and can stay on the field for the Highlanders next year.
With only a few chances remaining for Squire, Frizell and Fifita to prove themselves in the black jersey before the World Cup, whoever puts their hand up in 2019 can force their way in, while those that don’t perform may be left on the outer.
In other news:
Comments on RugbyPass
Jake White is a brilliant coach and a master in the press. This is another masterclass in media relations and PR but its also a very narrow view with arguments that dont always hold water. White wants his team to win, he wants the best players in SA and wants his team competitive. You however have to face up to the reality of a poor exchange rate and big clubs with big budgets. SA Rugby cant compete and unless it can find more money SA players will keep leaving regardless of Springbok eligibility and this happened in 2015 - 2017. Also rugby is not cricket. Cricket has 3 formats and T20 cricket is where the money is at. When it comes to club vs country the IPL is king but that wont happen because the international calendar does not clash with the club calendar in rugby. So the argument about rugby going down the same path as cricket is really a non-starter
13 Go to commentsNZ rugby seem not to have learnt anything from professional rugby. Super rugby was dying and SA left before they died with the competition. SA rugby did a u turn on their approach to international players playing overseas and such players are now selected for Bok teams. As much as each country would love to retain their players playing in local competitions, this is the way the world is evolving my friends. Move with it or stay 20 years behind the times. One more thing. NZ rugby hierarchy think they are the big cheese. Take a more humble approach guys. You do not seem to have your players best interests at heart.
3 Go to commentsBeaches? In Cardiff? Where?
1 Go to commentsHe is right , the Crusaders will be a threat. Scott Barrett, ( particularly), Fergus Burke , Codie Taylor, ( from sabbatical) etc due back soon for the Crusaders. There are others like Zach Gallagher too. People can right the Crusaders off, Top 8 , here we come !!
1 Go to commentsWe will always struggle for money to match the other sides but the least the WRU can do is invest properly in Welsh rugby. Too much has been squandered on vanity projects like the hotel and roof walk amongst others which will never see a massive return. Hanging the 4 pro sides out to dry over the last decade is now coming back to bite the WRU financially as well as on the pitch. You reap what you sow.
1 Go to commentsWhat do you get if you cross a doctor with a fish? A plastic sturgeon
14 Go to commentsWhat happened to feleti Kaitu’u? Hasnt played in a while right?
1 Go to commentsGregor I just can’t agree with you. You are trying to find something that just isn’t there. Jordie Barrett has signed until 2028. By the end of that he would have spent probably 11-12 years on Super Rugby and you say he can’t possibly have one season playing somewhere else. It is absurd. What about this scenario, the NZR play hard ball and he decides to leave and play overseas. How would that affect the competition. There seems to be an agenda by certain journalists to push certain agendas and don’t like it when it’s not to their liking. I fully support the NZR on this. Gregor needs to get a life.
3 Go to commentsHope he stays as believe he can do a great job.
1 Go to commentsMake what step up? Manie has a World Cup winner’s medal around his neck and changed the way the Springboks can play. He doesn’t have anything to prove to anyone. The win record of the Boks with him in the team is tremendous. Sacha can be wonderful and I hope he has a very succesful Bok career, but comparing him to Manie in terms of the next Bok flyhalf is very strange. Manie is the incumbent (not the next) and doing pretty incredibly.
1 Go to comments00 😍 U
1 Go to commentsSabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.
3 Go to commentsJake White talks more sense than anything I've read in the last 5 years. Hope someone's listening.
13 Go to commentsThe Springboks tried going down the road of only picking home-based players and it was an unmitigated disaster in 2016 and 2017. Picking overseas-based players has been one of the main reason the Boks have done so well since 2018, not only because of the quality Rassie could call on, but because of the knowledge and experience those players brought into camp from England, France and Japan. With some of the big names playing abroad it also gave younger players in SA the chance to break through at franchise level. Would we have seen the emergence of a Ruan Nortje if RG and Lood were still at the Bulls? Not so sure. I understand why Jake would want to block players leaving since his job depends on good results but it’s an approach that would take Bok rugby back to the bad old days and no South African wants to see that.
13 Go to commentsExeter were thumped by 38 points. And they only had to hop on a train.
39 Go to commentsI am De Groot.
1 Go to commentsHad hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”
11 Go to commentsWhat was the excuse for the other knockout blowouts then? Does the result not prove the Saints were just so much better? Wise call to put your eggs in one basket when you’ve got 2 comps simultaneously finishing.
39 Go to commentsReally hope Kuruvoli and his partner rock the Canes.
1 Go to commentsI wonder what impact Samson has had on their attack, as the team seems less prone to trundle it up the middle, take the tackle and then trundle it up again. I lost faith in the coach last year as the Rebelss looked like a 2nd/3rd rate South African team. I also disliked Gordon standing back, often ignored as the forward battle went on and on. Maybe its our Aussie way of not getting off our A***’s until the enemy is at the gate.
86 Go to comments