Northern | US

'Always three truths': Rassie Erasmus and Jaco Peyper respond to accusations of slowing the game


Rassie Erasmus, Head Coach of South Africa is interviewed ahead of the 2026 Nations Championship match between South Africa and Scotland. (Photo by Johan Rynners - Nations Championship/Getty Images)
Comments
103 Comments

Springboks head coach Rassie Erasmus and technical consultant Jaco Peyper have responded to the narrative that the Springboks want to play a ‘slow game’ against the All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Peyper revealed that “not once” have the Springboks got feedback that they slow the game down in 2026 following the new protocols for feedback.

The former referee who now consults to the Springboks confirmed the law that the Springboks play to, which is that they have 30 seconds from the time the mark is given to form the set piece.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“There was a Shape of the Game meeting at the beginning of the year, where all the big issues, big ticket issues in the world is being discussed,” Peyper said.

“We call it the key focus areas for referees, and that’s basically the contract between refereeing and coaching. Coaching players to play this way, we’ll try and referee this way, and then there’s alignment on Monday post-match.

“Over time, the five games I’ve played, we’ve not had one feedback that we slow down the game.

“We’ve certainly not got negative feedback around it, and what we expect is to play in terms of those agreements with the play between referees and coaches.

“And yes, the law is very clear: 30 seconds from the moment the referee puts his foot down to make a mark, whether it’s scrum or lineout, not from the whistle, from when the foot’s put down, there’s 30 seconds to form, not to get the ball in.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have to at the end of that, and we respect that, and we train to that.”

Erasmus added that in that 30 seconds timeframe the attacking side can do what they like.

“What you do up until that lineout, you can pray if you want to,” Erasmus said.

“You can down on your knees. If you want to huddle, you can huddle. There’s nothing in the law that say you can’t huddle, you know.

“We’ve got 11 languages which we have to make sure that everybody understands the lineout call. So you can huddle.

“Then when the referee gives the mark, then within 30 seconds you must form the lineout. So there’s no law that say you can’t huddle.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Peyper believed that the narrative about slowing the game down comes whenever teams play at altitude.

From his experience, the side under the most pressure is the one that wants a slower game and that goes back to his time as a referee officiating Super Rugby games.

“I’ve referee’d many Super Rugby games here where teams that travel, you know, slow the game down,” he said.

“It’s the same. The Lions didn’t want that. The Bulls didn’t want that. But you can also slow the game down by continuously infringing at the breakdown or at the maul and break the game tempo there.

“Good thing is there’s proper strong referees on these matches and there’s clear. We are very clear on the guidelines, so it’s up to the teams who’s under pressure. They will probably try and slow the game down.”

On whether this series is about contrasting styles, the high tempo All Blacks against the slower paced Springboks, Erasmus was philosophical and said there is a certain way that South Africa wants to play in high pressure situations.

“I think there’s always three truths: New Zealand’s truth, the world’s truth, and then and what we believe, and then there’s the truth, the ‘waarheid’,” he said.

“Now the truth, the ‘waarheid’ is Afrikaans’ word for truth. Now the waarheid is our last two games against New Zealand in Auckland and in Wellington. People can go and look at those games. You know, were those slow games?

“New Zealand beat us in the first one against Auckland, protected their record there, and then we got we got a good one in the second one.

“We think there’s a certain way how you win World Cups, and we think that’s a grind.

“We think when you’re under pressure on your attack, it’s very tough to to keep cohesion if the pressure is very big and you start fumbling a few balls and then you must stick to your guns.

“We try to find a balance between that, and when games are really, really clutch and crunch, that you have a system that you can fall back onto, which protects the players sometimes from not always having the confidence to do things.”

Watch Rugby's Greatest Rivalry LIVE

Two rugby giants collide. Stream live, replays and highlights free on RugbyPass TV. 

Watch on RPTV

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

103 Comments
R
RK 27 days ago

Ah AB’s with their shitty rugby league narrative, how boring.

B
Blackmania 27 days ago

A lot of discussion that doesn’t really lead anywhere.


Each side sticks to its own convictions. Do you play slowly or do you play quickly?


When you’re dominating, you tend to want to play quickly to build on that dominance as you see your opponent getting weaker and weaker, and you play slowly when you feel like you’re running out of oxygen. There’s not much more to say about it…


In Wellington last year, the Boks were playing faster than the All Blacks…


That said, the referee does need to be responsible for enforcing the clock. And it has to be said, the Stormers and Sharks did play around with the clock a little. The Bulls did it a bit less.


Can’t wait for Saturday at 5pm local time!

S
ST 27 days ago

One of the more exciting press conferences in recent times. 😁

J
JW 27 days ago

“And yes, the law is very clear: 30 seconds from the moment the referee puts his foot down to make a mark, whether it’s scrum or lineout, not from the whistle, from when the foot’s put down, there’s 30 seconds to form, not to get the ball in.

Not having watched any SB rugby his year I still wager they hadn’t sent a single set piece in under 30secs.

“We’ve got 11 languages which we have to make sure that everybody understands the lineout call. So you can huddle.

Haha this is a great set pierce from Rassi!

J
JW 27 days ago

“I think there’s always three truths: New Zealand’s truth, the world’s truth, and then and what we believe, and then there’s the truth, the ‘waarheid’,” he said.

So four? Haha this is comedy hour!

M
Mitch 27 days ago

I feel like there’s been a misunderstanding here.


I believe New Zealanders aren't objecting to South Africa's right to play a slower more, physically abrasive game when they're in possession before upping the tempo when it’s on to attack, it’s around tardiness when it comes to forming up for set pieces, with the Sharks taking 50 seconds to form a lineout the example being used by Dave Rennie at his press conference.

J
JW 27 days ago

Exemplified by the BaaBaas pushing the Springbok team with their high profile stars and TJP telling the ref to enforce the laws.

W
Wayneo 27 days ago

Unfortunately, you would be sorely mistaken thinking there is any kind of misunderstanding here.


This isn’t a genuine concern about the clock, it is a calculated attempt by the ABs and the New Zealand public to manipulate the match officials into favoring their specific style of play.


By publicly complaining about the time it takes to form a lineout, they are trying to pressure referees into rushing the set piece based on a misguided view that a faster game automatically disadvantages the Springboks.


The reality is that they know exactly what is coming, and they are terrified of it.


They are fully aware that the Boks will cause a massive amount of accumulated fatigue in the ABs with their relentless scrum dominance and brutal lineout mauls.


If the set piece is played properly, the ABs' pack will be completely gassed and physically broken by the last quarter of the match (for example Wellington last year).

H
HS 27 days ago

I'm sure Tomati Williams didn’t want to speed up the game when Damian Willemse cruised by him for Esterhuizen to score in the last match between the two teams.

J
Jmann 27 days ago

Boks have been getting away with that for years. That is how you keep such a big bunch of power athletes going for 80mins. You’d only be able to imagine what might happen if anyone actually conducted dope-testing in SA….

W
Wayneo 27 days ago

Oh, bless your heart for proving the classic old adage so beautifully - When you completely lack the rugby IQ to form a logical argument, your only choice is to resort to desperate, pathetic personal attacks to try and soothe your bruised ego.


It must be absolutely exhausting living inside a fragile online bubble where you have to invent wild, bitter conspiracies just to cope with the reality of your own team being tactically and physically outclassed.


Throwing blind, baseless accusations into the comment section is a truly legendary level of coping mechanism.


When a world-class rugby team executes a flawless tactical system that completely suffocates the opposition, it's hilarious to watch the woke compliance brigade look for any imaginary excuse to avoid admitting they are simply second rate.


If you can't handle a dominant team legally utilizing the rulebook, them maybe you should go grab a soy latte, find a safe space, and leave the rugby to the grown-ups.

Q
Quincy79 27 days ago

“Ah yes, the classic ‘they’re good, so they must be doping’ argument. 😂 Imagine watching a team dominate physically for 80 minutes and your first instinct is to become an unpaid anti-doping investigator. If you’ve got actual evidence, present it. If not, it’s just another conspiracy theory wearing a rugby jersey.”

C
CG 27 days ago

You can take as a yes we will be slowing it down

Waarhiet sounds like Trumpian alternative facts

Q
Quincy79 27 days ago

“Take it as a yes”? 😂 That’s quite a leap from “you think the Boks will slow it down” to presenting it as established fact. And throwing in “Waarheid sounds like Trumpian alternative facts” doesn’t exactly strengthen the argument — it just adds a political punchline where rugby analysis was supposed to be. Let’s see what actually happens on the field before declaring your prediction a fact.”

B
Bazzallina 27 days ago

Renz is attempting to put pressure on the ref to set the mark that’s when the clock starts in fairness he has been in this since start if NC …but Rassie aint wrong with 3 truths and Journo wasn’t wrong when he asked the question and answered at the same time is the truth in the middle somewhere .

I am all for refs naking sure teams pull finger and get to setpiece not for any ABs advantage just want game to get started quicker.

I wouldn’t suprised if in this game just like upcoming WC that both sides get some leeway due to the intensity and importance of the contest

R
RugCs 27 days ago

“We call it the key focus areas for referees, and that’s basically the contract between refereeing and coaching. Coaching players to play this way, we’ll try and referee this way, and then there’s alignment on Monday post-match.

If there’s already an agreement between the referees and the teams, why does the NZ coaching staff suddenly get the audacity to ignore that contract and pressure the refs through the media?


Well done to Peyper for putting them in their place with the facts.

R
RW 27 days ago

Its the old adage where if in a debate, you cant win the debate you resort to personal attacks by trying to undermine the legitimacy of your opposition.


The ABs haven’t had such a long and big losing streak, they are losing the argument and it appears they are resorting to underhanded tactics of undermining the strategies of the SBs.


Also on a side note, even the fastest cars need to slow down, and more often than not.


ABs might not admit it but a high speed tempo is not a viable option over 80 minutes. You need the game to slow down. Get your breath back, and assess the situation.

J
JW 27 days ago

The ABs haven’t had such a long and big losing streak, they are losing the argument and it appears they are resorting to underhanded tactics of undermining the strategies of the SBs.

Lol wut? You have only seen the opposite. The only one arguing is Rassie.

ABs might not admit it but a high speed tempo is not a viable option over 80 minutes.

What is South Africa scared of then?

G
GH 27 days ago

Couldn't agree more 👍

K
Koro Teeps 27 days ago

If anything the Africans coaches bringing up the 30 seconds to pack scrum or set lineout will play into NZs hands. 30 seconds is fine as opposed to the 50 seconds that the Sharks dragged out. Its a refereeing issue not a playing one.

H
HenryAU 27 days ago

Be careful what you wish for, when your scrum is under pressure and multiple resets are required it is normally the team that is under pressure (like the Sharks) who wants the extra time to regain composure.

H
Hammer Head 27 days ago

Everyone wants a high tempo game when they’re winning.


It’s a fairly well established practice in just about any sport in the world - slowing down and dictating the pace of the game to find focus and measure.


How New Zealand want to play when they have possession is up to them. By all means dictate the pace of play to your hearts content.


But don’t tell other teams how they may play.


It’s getting old and tired.


Quote of the day for me came from Brendan Nel et al. All this noise comes from a country that has to contend with the so-called “pressure coming from league”.


Grow a pair and deal with it.


Arme mense.

J
JW 27 days ago

HAHAHA this comment is so irconic. So SA aren’t any good because they slow the game down? You’re a poor Springbok supporter HH!


BTW the topic is that you can’t dictate play with the ball. The opposition can simply stop it.

B
Bazzallina 27 days ago

Hammer nobody wants to watch to much fluffing around whether it be TMO or set piece shenanigans or 3rd set of contact lenses the use it ruck laws and goal kicking clock for example are a godsend

N
NoLongerARuck 27 days ago

It is true that the Boks have not been spoken to by refs that they are slowing the game down. In truth the Boks are playing to the laws. Its also true that games featuring the Boks feature the lowest ball in play time in all of international rugby. It also features more kicking especially off 9 and longer caterpillar rucks due to the way the Boks play. Theres nothing illegal about that and does that mean they are slowing the game down? No it doesnt. The Springboks still clear the ball from the base withing the legally required time and the refs have had no issues. The NZ narrative against the refs being Northern and insunuating that the Boks were resorting to gainsmanship started well before the series. In fact it has been going on for the best part of 4 weeks since the end of the Nations Championship and the referee appointments. They are actively pressuring the refs and have laid the groundwork to heap more pressure on the refs if the Ball in play time and tempo of the game is not kept up. Its not surprising the Springboks have now started their own narrative to “tell their side of the story”. Whatever the case lets hope that the refs give both sides a fair shake and ref to the law leaving the external noise out of the equation. This is a good officiating team with lots of experience, I dont expect them to be swayed either way.

J
JW 27 days ago

In truth the Boks are playing to the laws.

No, it’s against the spirit of the game to fake injuries and stoppages.

W
Wayneo 27 days ago

I think its great that Rassie went on the offensive against them like this. He knows he will have the strength in numbers backing him from SA to drown out the constant whinging and moaning and push the lab book under their noses to start reading.

H
Hammer Head 27 days ago

It’s been going on for ages.

W
Wayneo 27 days ago

Huge shoutout to Rassie for bringing Jaco Peyper along to run a remedial reading class for all the emotional halfwits out there.


It is brilliant theatre, but more importantly, it is complete tactical validation.


As the ex referee Jaco Peyper so kindly pointed out, the team under pressure is usually the one actually trying to kill the tempo by infringing at the breakdown (sounds exactly like a team we play against regularly).


Both just gave a masterclass in how to play the game to the absolute limit of the law, leaving the woke rugby police with nothing but anxiety and pre-match excuses.


It’s absolutely hilarious seeing the hyper-sensitive crowd suffer a total emotional meltdown because the Springboks are literally following the law book.


Heaven forbid a team uses their legal 30 seconds to huddle and translate calls into 11 languages, probably seen as micro-aggression against the high-tempo vibes of the game!


The online compliance brigade crying out for a safe space because a tactical lineout or scrum reset at altitude violated their fragile emotional boundaries.


If standard, law-abiding rugby tactics trigger your woke anxieties this easily, you should probably switch to a non-contact sport.

R
RugCs 27 days ago

I like how Peyper is calling out the negative and cynical tactics from NZ. I’m sure that Peyper would have whispered in the ear of the referees.


“The narrative is about slowing down, but you can also slow the game down by infringing at the breakdown or at the maul and break the game tempo there”

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close