Northern | US

Welsh Rugby Union defends plans to halve number of regions


CARDIFF, WALES - MARCH 29: General view ahead of the Guinness Women's Six Nations 2025 match between Wales and England at Principality Stadium on March 29, 2025 in Cardiff, Wales. (Photo by Huw Fairclough/Getty Images)
Comments
4 Comments

The Welsh Rugby Union has recognised the “hurt and anger” caused by their proposal to reduce the number of professional men’s sides in Wales from four to two, but insisted maintaining the status quo is not the “right thing” to do.

ADVERTISEMENT

Welsh rugby’s governing body has produced a radical plan to turn around the game at both club and international level, outlining its ambitions in a 90-page consultation document entitled ‘The Future of Elite Rugby in Wales’.

There will be a six-week consultation period before the WRU makes a final decision on the plans, and WRU chief executive Abi Tierney has urged people to “improve on the proposals” and provide “something fit for purpose for Welsh rugby”.

The WRU’s proposal to halve its number of four men’s professional sides – Cardiff, Dragons, Ospreys and Scarlets – to two will be the most significant talking point in a document which outlined four potential models for the game in Wales.

It remains unclear whether the two future sides being proposed will be new entities or existing teams, but the two organisations will each have a men’s and women’s team.

Tierney said: “This is a momentous day for Welsh rugby. No decisions have been made, but we feel, based on the analysis, that this is the strongest (option) yet.

“I know how emotional rugby is in Wales, and people will be hurting today when they think what it could mean potentially for them and their team.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I recognise the hurt and anger people are going to be feeling. Change is hard and this is hard for fans.

“But fans’ numbers drop has also not been a great experience for anybody, and we want to create an experience they can be proud of.

“What we were doing and keeping on doing for fans was not the right thing. I would encourage everybody to imagine how exciting it could be and take that step into the future.”

The WRU proposal comes amid Ospreys plans to move into a redeveloped stadium at St Helen’s in Swansea for the 2026-27 season and the Scarlets having recently unveiled new investors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dragons said this week elite professional rugby must continue in Gwent, while Cardiff are currently owned by the WRU, having gone into administration in April.

The WRU may face legal action from regions that could essentially be put out of business, with WRU chairman Richard Collier-Keywood saying “two or three areas of potential legal challenge” exist.

The WRU has also proposed the creation of a national campus at a site yet to be decided, which would be the home of the men’s and women’s professional teams, as well as Wales’ national sides and the union’s academy.

Players were briefed on the WRU’s plan on Tuesday and Dave Reddin, the new director of rugby and elite performance, is confident suggestions of possible player strike action will not materialise.

Reddin said: “The national campus would be a radical departure and doing something different, a defensive moat for Welsh rugby and creating a competitive advantage.

“We’ve got to look outside the box if we want to try and do things differently.

“Be brave enough to lead sometimes and do things that no one else is doing. Do things that people think are a bit nutty, too different or too uncomfortable.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cnw 1 hour ago
France has conquered and reconquered Europe. Can it reach its Mount Everest?

It’s mind boggling that the best are not playing the best in July! Though the commercial reality bites here. On the B/C/D I think the issue is one of communicating ideas. You point out that in reality the majority of the players were third or fourth choice or perhaps worse. And the way you explained it as someone who clearly knows the French comp that makes sense. So I accept that it was perhaps a third or fourth choice team overall. I should be clear though I think that the quality of the team exceeded the sum of its parts. And I think a D grade is way too low. Their performance was too good to get such a grade. And I think that reflects that they are very good players who had a good chance to build combinations. Would the first choice players have played better - very likely. But that does not diminish the performance of the boys that played.

Put another way, I understand that the French team that played the Boks had a good number of first choice players in stark contrast to the teams that played in NZ. But they did not perform like an “A” team - clearly they had only got together just before that game. They started well but the lack of match readiness showed in the second half. In contrast the Boks had both their first choice team that was a battle hardened unit - and they played their A game, as they did against the ABs first choice team in Wellington. In contrast the first choice ABs beat the then first choice Boks in Auckland - it was the best performance all year by the ABs - it was an A grade performance (the Bok dominance in the forwards notwithstanding).



...

612 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close