Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Is it time for England to move away from George Ford?

Should England move away from George Ford?

Eddie Jones has persisted with a Ford & Farrell partnership for most of his reign as England’s coach. It has been a maligned arrangement that is now well and truly under the microscope following another loss and series defeat in South Africa.

ADVERTISEMENT

The winning streak papered over attacking inefficiencies of the England team and fans and pundits were willing to gloss over shortcomings. On the back of a sixth consecutive loss and conceding an unassailable 2-0 lead to South Africa, Jones must change directions or risk losing his job.

The team is regressing quickly, heading on a crash course towards an early World Cup exit. This pack is ill-disciplined, fatigued and sloppy. They have conceded penalties at the wrong times in this South Africa series for all three of those reasons. Compounding matters are the decision makers, just when they have South Africa on the ropes they shelve the cue and revert back to ineffective tactics.

George Ford was masterful in the opening stages of both games, laying on beautiful passes and attacking the line. He was largely involved in all of England’s opening tries, which helped build quick leads.

Ford’s problem is he vanishes from the game just as quickly, failing to maintain control with tactically poor decisions.

With momentum swings flowing against England, they just need to hold the ball when they get possession back. Instead, they throw possession away with poor kicking, asking for more Springbok punishment.

Great sides find a weakness and then go after that weakness relentlessly. England could not be stopped with width and clinical passing early in both games. They looked far better with ball in hand, stretching to the edges. Despite finding South Africa’s weakness, they continued to revert back to conservative rugby. George Ford and Elliot Daly were instrumental in throwing these games away by failing to make good decisions around when to kick and when not to, and failing to execute effectively when they did make the right decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ford proved he is a skillful playmaker with excellent passing and timing that England can build the attack around. The problem has been managing the flow of the game and maintaining control. It is either Eddie Jones’s game plan or Ford’s inability to read the situation.

With the series lost and the third test an opportunity to experiment, there are two potential changes England can make. They have the best ball-playing 10 in the Premiership in Danny Cipriani available and the current Premiership winning 10 in Owen Farrell.

England could continue with the double-barrelled playmaker approach with Cipriani elevated to the starting lineup while Farrell sticks to 12. The Gloucester-bound flyhalf is a possession-based player, who is a natural passer with a Midas touch. At Wasps, he played his best rugby in a ball-retention system with limited kicking duties.

Cipriani’s first touch of his 12-minute cameo in the second test was a line break assist in the midfield, effortlessly putting Daly into the clear, where Daly blew a certain try by not passing. He followed that up with more attacking intent, probing the line and facilitating runners. He even floated out wider to allow Farrell to play his natural game at first receiver.

ADVERTISEMENT

This combination looked promising for a few fleeting minutes and is worth exploring more over 80 minutes. With Cipriani adept at manipulating overlaps on the edge, Farrell can get closer to the action and play a lot more first receiver than he does with Ford.

Farrell is more than capable with the kicking duties, allowing Cipriani to play similar to his role at Wasps.

The second option is to give Farrell the reigns at 10 and bring in a crash-and-bash type of 12 but with a lack of them in this squad, it will be difficult. Henry Slade and Alex Lozowski are not that type of midfielder. The best option with this squad appears to be starting Cipriani at 10 with Farrell at 12, but playing a flexible game with Cipriani as a quasi-fullback in attack.

Eddie Jones described the second test as a horror movie on re-run. If he wants to miss the third instalment he needs to change up the script and the cast.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 6 hours ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

220 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT