Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Tell your kids there is a good chance of injuries' Jacques Burger responds to sharing brutal schoolboy tackle

Jacques Burger of Saracens tackles Sitiveni Sivivatu. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

The sharing of an eye-watering hit from a South African schoolboy match by former Saracens backrow Jacques Burger ignited a heated debate around concussion and player welfare on Twitter.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Namibian international Burger tweeted a video of a brutal tackle from a Monument Boys versus Paarl Boys match in South Africa that was described as ‘sickening’ and ‘not ok at all’ by viewers.

Sam Peters, the UK journalist and concussion awareness advocate also took issue with the video, questioning if rugby as a sport should be taking pleasure in such incidents:

“Huge question for rugby and @Nabasboer do we celebrate seeing a child smashed head first into rock hard ground or search for ways to avoid? For what it’s worth, watching this makes me physically sick.”

Burger has responded to the criticism with some direct advice for parents whose children play rugby: “Tell your kids there is a good chance of injuries if they play rugby.”

He explained “that’s the reality” but implored those to work on their techniques in the interests of safety.

“Work on better/safer techniques so they can be smarter, well-prepared rugby players. Also, don’t forget to tell them to do their best and enjoy,” he wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

The criticism continued to flow towards Burger after the statement with one commentator asking for an apology.

“Just apologise for promoting a clearly illegal tackle as good?”

“How can a better technique stop someone flying in chest height off their feet knocking you out? I get what you are saying but you can’t prepare for that type of ‘tackle’” another wrote with reference to original tackle.

Scott Barrett ahead of the Hurricanes:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 9 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Springbok Eben Etzebeth calls ‘one of the hardest men in rugby’ The Springbok Eben Etzebeth calls ‘one of the hardest men in rugby’
Search