Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Tele'a should now be surplus to requirements for the All Blacks

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND - APRIL 12: Mark Tele'a of the Blues celebrates in the team huddle after winningthe round nine Super Rugby Pacific match between Blues and Moana Pasifika at Eden Park, on April 12, 2025, in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

I wouldn’t pick Mark Tele’a in the All Blacks this year. 

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s nothing personal, nor a judgement on his ability. If fit, Tele’a is the best wing in the country. 

No, I wouldn’t pick Tele’a for the same reasons I wouldn’t have picked Sam Cane and TJ Perenara a year ago. 

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

And there’s the rub. 

All Blacks coach Scott Robertson did pick Cane and Perenara in 2024, despite them both having signed deals to play in Japan. 

Had it been a Rugby World Cup year, I wouldn’t have had a problem with that. A world cup swansong is an established part of the rugby cycle now. 

But, at that stage of the road towards 2027, Cane and Perenara were – and should’ve been – surplus to requirements. Instead they were given an elongated farewell tour, which I believe was entirely unjustified. 

I’ve opined that I believe players such as Tele’a leave New Zealand in the prime of their All Black careers because they don’t feel a great sense of belonging. They see the special treatment given to players such as Cane and Perenara and realise, rightly or wrongly, that it will never be extended to them. 

ADVERTISEMENT

No, they’re better to cash in while they can and leave the special ones in the All Black group to enjoy the favours that come with it. 

Tele’a is eligible for the All Blacks in 2025, just as Cane and Perenara were last year, which creates an interesting predicament for Robertson. 

On precedent alone, he would be a hypocrite not to pick Tele’a. If he doesn’t, then all that does is reinforce the view that the All Blacks are a team run for the benefit of a favoured few. 

I’m not knocking Cane and Perenara as players. They had fine careers and served the All Blacks well over a long period of time. 

ADVERTISEMENT

But they were one-year rentals come 2024.  

Cane must’ve been as surprised as anyone when Robertson came calling, given he effectively retired from test football following the 2023 Rugby World Cup final. 

Honourable man that he is, Cane accepted that he was a symbol of the previous coaching regime. He’d done his time, captained and played as best he could and realised he had no future in the team. 

Semi-retirement in Japan was the prudent option, given Cane’s status as a relic from the past. 

No offence would’ve been caused had Robertson not selected him last year. In fact most people would’ve felt that was the natural order of things because when you build towards a World Cup, you don’t invest time in players who aren’t going to be there. 

And yet Robertson picked him. And Perenara too, despite other halfbacks having gone past him in the pecking order. 

It all would’ve been a much cleaner transition from the Ian Foster era into Robertson’s, if the latter didn’t opt to take some of the old guard along for the ride. 

In doing so, he created a rod for his own back. 

As I say, on ability alone Tele’a deserves a place in the All Black squad this year. And, for the team’s sake, I hope Robertson comes to the same conclusion. 

But if he doesn’t, if he decides Tele’a is leaving and has given up any hold on the jersey then – on the strength of who got picked last year – I fear he risks losing the respect of some of the players. 

By picking Cane and Perenara last time round, Robertson’s now damned if he picks Tele’a and damned if he doesn’t. 

Unfortunately, that’s a bed of his own making. 

Download the RugbyPass app now!

News, stats, live rugby and more! Download the new RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

28 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 1 hour ago
Eben Etzebeth staring at huge ban after another red card

Well… I'd say the modern Boks are not a particularly violent team but it's impossible to getaway with much violence on an international rugby field now. The Boks of yesteryear were at times brutal. Whether or not the reputation is justified, they do have that reputation amongst a lot of rugby fans.

As for point 2.. it's a tricky one, I don't want to slander a nation here. I'm no “Bok hater”, but I've gotta say some Bok fans are the most obnoxious fans I've personally encountered. Notably this didn't seem to be a problem until the Boks became the best in the world. I agree that fans from other nations can be awful too, every nation has it's fair share of d-heads but going on any rugby forum or YouTube comments is quite tedious these days owing to the legions of partisan Bok fans who jump onto every thread regardless of if it's about the Boks to tell everyone how much better the Boks are than everyone else. A Saffa once told me that SA is a troubled country and because of that the Boks are a symbol of SA victory against all odds so that's why the fans are so passionate. At least you recognise that there is an issue with some Bok fans, that's more than many are willing to concede. Whatever the reason, it's just boring is all I can tell you and I can say coming from a place of absolute honesty I encounter far, far more arrogance and obnoxious behaviour from Bok fans than any other fanbase - the kiwis were nothing like this when they were on top. So look much love to SA, I bear no hatred of ill will, I just want to have conversations about rugby without being told constantly that the Boks are the best team in the world and all coaches except Rassie are useless etc



...

205 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT