Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Super Rugby final deserves a more fitting stage

By Tom Vinicombe
Christchurch's Orangetheory Stadium (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

The Crusaders will host the Super Rugby final in Christchurch for the second year in a row when they welcome the Jaguares on Saturday evening.

ADVERTISEMENT

When you play at home, you find that some of the 50/50 decisions tend to fall your way. Luck, however plays just a tiny part in the Crusaders’ incredible run of remaining unbeaten in the 23 finals matches that they’ve hosted.

Their first ever knockout match was in 1998 when they narrowly escaped against the Sharks (then Natal) in Christchurch. The next weekend they travelled to Auckland and ruined the Blues’ chances of a title three-peat.

There is absolutely no question that the Crusaders are Super Rugby’s champion pace-setters. Only twice in their history have they finished outside the top seven teams and there have been just four seasons in which the Crusaders didn’t participate in the sudden death stages of the competition.

Until recently, the champion team also had a champion stadium to call home.

Jade Stadium hosted Super Rugby finals in 2002, 2005 and 2006. Rights changes saw the Cruaders’ home ground rebranded as AMI Stadium in 2007 and one more Super Rugby victory was earned on home soil under that alias.

AMI Stadium was never the biggest stadium in the world. The ground was capable of holding just under 40,000 people at its peak, after expansions to increase the capacity in the lead up to the 2011 Rugby World Cup. That may seem unimpressive on a world-scale, but it was still the third largest in the country.

Of course, Christchurch did not end up hosting any matches at the World Cup after being rocked by a massive earthquake in February 2011.

ADVERTISEMENT

AMI Stadium was damaged in the 7.1 magnitude quake and has now been all but demolished. Plans for a new landmark stadium in Christchurch are still being debated, but we certainly won’t see a new stadium in the city any time in the near future.

The 2011 season saw the Crusaders travel far and wide for their matches. Home fixtures were played in Nelson, Timaru, Napier (technically part of the Hurricanes catchment area) and a game against the Sharks was even taken to Twickenham in the UK. The Crusaders still somehow managed to make the final that year but fell to the Reds in Brisbane – a city also afflicted by bad natural disasters in 2011.

Rugby still needed a permanent home in Canterbury after the quake, so the Crusaders relocated to Rugby League Park (now named Orangetheory Stadium) for 2012 and beyond.

This weekend’s final will be hosted at that very stadium for the second time in as many years – and the Crusaders will likely head into the next few seasons as favourites to host the ultimate game of the year as well, given their ongoing class.

ADVERTISEMENT

Therein lies the problem.

Christchurch’s premier venue, home of Super Rugby’s most successful team, boasts a capacity of just 18,000 people.

Orangetheory Stadium is the smallest main Super Rugby ground in New Zealand. Waikato Stadium, home of the Chiefs, is the next smallest at that arena still boasts a 7,000 person advantage.

Outside of New Zealand, all four South African home stadiums can accommodate for over 50,000 fans whilst the Australian stadiums can all host upwards of 25,000 people. The Sunwolves’ main ground in Japan has a capacity of 27,000. The Jaguares, who are travelling to Christchurch for the Super Rugby final, enjoyed playing host to 31,000 fans for their semi-final showdown with the Brumbies.

Purely when taking into consideration how many fans can get out to the matches, the Crusaders have the worst stadium in all of Super Rugby.

The Crusaders have earned the right to play the final match of the season in front of their fans, there’s no doubt about that, but hosting the biggest match of the year in a stadium that can only accommodate for 18,000 seems like a slap in the face for the Southern Hemisphere’s premier club competition. The Jaguares will certainly feel a bit bemused when they run out on Saturday night, given the crowd they just received at their previous game.

The grounds for the final of the Champions Cup, Europe’s top club competition, is now decided before the tournament commences. This season’s showcase event was held in Newcastle and has been spread across five different countries over the last five years. The last time fewer than 50,000 attended a Champion’s Cup final was way back in 2003.

Super Rugby in its current format can’t exactly take the same approach. Fans are willing to travel from all over Europe to see the Champion’s Cup final because they’re only ever a few hours flight away from the venue. Super Rugby, on the other hand, would seriously struggle to attract crowds to a final between two Australian teams if it were held in Johannesburg or Pretoria, for example.

It creates an interesting conundrum for Super Rugby’s organisers. Hosting flagship events at stadiums that can cater for fewer than 20,000 people is huge wasted commercial opportunity. There’s something charming about playing a professional game in front of a relatively small crowd – but for a sport that is looking to expand, there’s no room for sentimentality. Completely neutral venues is also not an option.

Perhaps moving forward we could see finals hosted within the same country of the top seeded team, but not necessarily at their home ground. Whilst this might be a sensible option, good luck convincing Crusaders fans that it’s better to host the final at the 60,000 seater in Auckland than in the heart of Crusaders territory.

It’s a challenging issue for Super Rugby – one more to add to the pile, given all the other problems that the competition faces. If the Crusaders still had their old stadium to play at then perhaps this wouldn’t be an issue at all – at Christchurch will not doubt have an excellent stadium in the future (a covered stadium, if the Gods are good). For now, however, it seems peculiar that the top competition in the Southern Hemisphere will conclude in front of one of the smallest stadiums used for professional rugby.

The Shortball – Scotty Stevenson and Ali Williams

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 1 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

1 Go to comments
M
Mzilikazi 4 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
S
Sam T 10 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

9 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'It has left a sour taste': Lima Sopoaga hits out at changes in Samoa 'It has left a sour taste': Lima Sopoaga hits out at changes in Samoa
Search