Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sunwolves axing was South Africa's revenge for 'bad blood' with Japan

The Sunwolves have struggled for an identity since inclusion and will drop out of Super Rugby next year. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Sunwolves head coach Tony Brown believes ‘bad blood’ exists between South Africa and Japan and it led to the decision for the Japanese-based franchise to be axed from Super Rugby after 2020.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking on the Fox Sports Podcast, Brown says the South Africans were ‘dead against’ having the Sunwolves involved.

“Nothing’s easy for the Sunwolves and obviously the devastating news that we were going to be out of the competition in 2021 is very disappointing,” Brown said.

“It wasn’t a big surprise, we were probably just hoping there was a slim chance we could survive and build something sustainable for years to come.

“There were so many things that went on and the South Africans were just dead against having the Sunwolves involved.

The South Africans have always been vocal about their displeasure with the travel demands for their teams with a Japanese-based franchise involved, which lead to Singapore-hosting games in front of a handful of spectators. But Brown believes the ‘bad blood’ stems from the Rugby World Cup vote.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BvfsKwwgINK/

“There’s a bit of resentment from what happened at the World Cup vote a few years ago and it’s a relationship that’s been pretty rough ever since the Sunwolves with Super Rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The next World Cup, France beating out South Africa for the hosting rights, I think there’s a little bit of bad blood there and various things like that counted against the Sunwolves.”

“So many things that were against the Sunwolves and it wasn’t really surprising that SANZAAR has decided not to have them involved.

SANZAAR claimed that the JRFU weren’t able to contribute enough financially to sustain the franchise, while reports surfaced that South Africa had threatened financial penalties to Australia and New Zealand should the Sunwolves remain.

“It was not that we were unwilling to underwrite the Sunwolves, we just couldn’t agree the financial terms presented to us by SANZAAR with other demands on our budget,” JRFU Chairman Noriyuki Sakamoto told Kyodo News.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a report by Kyodo News, the JRFU were asked to provide a $5m participation fee, pay $2m in travel expenses and forego certain broadcast revenue rights in a harsh move intended to strong-arm them financially. The conditions imposed weren’t applicable to any other team in the competition and were almost certain to result in Sunwolves being pulled.

SANZAAR’s statement stated that the JRFU had ‘determined’ Super Rugby has no longer the best pathway for the Japan national team, a claim that Tony Brown doesn’t agree with.

“I can’t see Japan Top League being as effective as the Sunwolves playing in Super Rugby, at preparing guys for international rugby,” Brown said.

“The last 3-4 years has been huge for the Japanese development as far as players being able to test themselves against some of the best players in the world.”

Kieran Read ahead of the clash with the Hurricanes:

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

281 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT