Northern | US

Springboks fans have never been humble


JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA - JULY 4: Henry Pollock of England during the 2026 Nations Championship match between South Africa and England at Ellis Park Stadium on July 4, 2026 in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo by Steve Haag/Nations Championship via Getty Images)
Comments
270 Comments

A few years ago, Henry Pollock told me that he wanted to be “spoken about as a great of the game”.

ADVERTISEMENT

He explained that one goal was simply an opportunity to move the posts further back. Winning a junior World Cup, making his international debut, beating New Zealand, lifting the Webb Ellis Cup and being named World Player of the Year were all merely “stepping stones”.

“I’m never satisfied,” he said.

Imagine the response if Pollock had actually said any of that. Picture the frothing replies, the bulging veins, the sudden concern for endangered values of rugby. Who does this blond English child think he is? Someone should wipe that smirk off his face.

VIDEO

Good thing, then, that none of the above is true. In reality those front-foot words belonged to Pieter-Steph du Toit, who shared them with me in 2021 ahead of the British & Irish Lions series. And rather than recoiling from his breathtaking self-belief, South Africans nodded along approvingly. Here was a man with standards. Here was a champion driven by destiny. Here was the relentless ambition that had made him great.

This is worth remembering the next time South Africans clutch their pearls over Pollock.

The young English flanker celebrates too loudly. He shushes crowds. He gesticulates, grins and appears conspicuously delighted with himself, especially when singing Olivia Dean hits with his shirt off. He is active on social media and seems to understand that professional sport is partly a branch of the entertainment industry. For all this, he has been called arrogant, obnoxious and windgat, that wonderfully textured Afrikaans word combining vanity, swagger and almost comic showmanship.

John Robbie, a former Ireland and Lions scrum-half who became a popular radio host in South Africa, recently suggested Pollock embodies everything South Africans, particularly Afrikaners, instinctively distrust. According to Robbie, the preferred South African rugby player is “quiet, dour, stiff-upper-lip, modest, thankful to God”. He contrasted Pollock with Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu, who supposedly lets his brilliance on the field do the talking.

There are two problems with that theory.

The first is that Feinberg-Mngomezulu is not especially humble either. He may not perform his confidence in precisely the same way as Pollock, but he has spoken openly about chasing records, winning individual honours and redefining what a South African fly-half can be. He told me last year that his clarity and confidence were sometimes misinterpreted, but that he intended to pursue success on his own terms.

ADVERTISEMENT

The second problem is that South Africans are not, and have never been, naturally humble people.

Spend a Saturday night in the Village in uMhlanga. People-watch at Cafe Caprice at Camps Bay. Stand near the weights section of a suburban gym or allow yourself to be cornered at a braai by a man who once played first-team rugby at a decent school.

Within minutes, you will know how much he can bench, how many beers he drank on his birthday, what car he drives and how many tries he scored in 2004. He may also mention his school before revealing his profession, his surname or the fact that you have met several times before.

South Africans rank themselves constantly. Who is strongest? Who can down a pint the fastest? Who braais the best steak? Who went to the toughest school? Who could have gone pro if not for that knee injury and a coach with a personal agenda?

ADVERTISEMENT

Even our humility is competitive. Nobody is more grounded than us. Nobody respects the opposition as intensely. Nobody devotes themselves to a greater cause like the Boks. Nobody understands that rugby is only a game quite like the nation that treats an under-13 schools fixture as a proxy war between civilisations.

This is not an argument against South Africans. The windgat is one of our great national archetypes. He is entertaining, ambitious and often capable of backing up his boasts. He does not enter a room so much as arrive in it, certain that everyone else has been waiting.

Besides, ambition is not the opposite of humility. Du Toit can speak about greatness and still be generous, hardworking, devoted to his team and deferential to his God. Feinberg-Mngomezulu can imagine himself breaking records without disrespecting those who came before him. Therefore, Pollock can believe he is destined for the summit without being a bad person.

The South African objection, it seems, is not really to confidence per se. It is to confidence expressed by somebody else.

We applied a similar standard to Ireland when they began puffing out their chests during the last World Cup cycle. Eben Etzebeth was irritated when Irish players allegedly told him, “See you in the final”, after beating South Africa in the group stage. He interpreted the remark as arrogance, evidence that Ireland were looking past New Zealand in the quarter-final.

Perhaps it was presumptuous. But Etzebeth had reportedly responded to the defeat by saying South Africa would get Ireland again “if they make it through”. Apparently one sentence was healthy Springbok conviction while the other represented an intolerable violation of rugby’s moral order.

The same sensitivity emerges whenever a particular New Zealand columnist suggests that South Africa’s time at the top may be nearing its end. Bok supporters do not respond with contemplative silence or indifference. They produce World Cup counts, scorelines, rankings, scrum montages and instructions to ‘cry more’.

Good. More of that.

These are unprecedented times. South Africa are back-to-back world champions, holders of the Rugby Championship and the world’s top-ranked men’s team. Their junior men are champions. The Blitzboks hold the Sevens gong. After beating Scotland 42-28 at Loftus, the Springboks had defeated every Six Nations team and all three Rugby Championship rivals inside a single 12-month span.

The women’s crown is the obvious piece missing from the collection, though the rapid progress of the Springbok Women suggests they are no longer content to remain peripheral to the story.

None of this will last forever. Rugby turns. Great players age, coaches leave and dominant systems are eventually decoded. One day, South Africans will again need to speak earnestly about rebuilding, character and lessons learned.

But that day has not yet arrived. So stop cosplaying as rugby’s monks. Stop insisting that South Africans are uniquely humble while attacking anyone with the nerve to advertise their greatness in a foreign accent.

Puff out your chest. Order another double brandy. Slap another chop on the braai. Count the trophies. Remind everyone who won the last two World Cups.

In short, be a little windgat. You, and the team you support, have earned the right.

Follow your favourites in the RugbyPass App

Your home for rugby. Download the RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!


Follow your favourite teams, tournaments and players, and get personalised news and Match Centre notifications direct to your device.


From live rugby streams and upcoming fixtures to breaking news, in-depth analysis and live scores, RugbyPass has everything you need to stay connected to the game.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

270 Comments
K
Keithlesovalballer 40 days ago

Dan the author - big (or massive) difference here is that whether you think Pieter Steph would have said that when he was 5 games into international rugby and had not won a world cup or international rugby player of the year? Because we can imagine Pollock saying something so verbose and unearned. Context is everything tjom.

u
unknown 43 days ago

That should include the Boks fans as well, I’ve stood next to one that even criticises the size of the temporary toilets, although he was the size of a small hill 🤣🤣🤣

D
Drew77 43 days ago

As a SAFFA living in the US, I have to say this piece is spot on. I often cringe at S African comments on rugby forums. I little humility goes a long way

f
fl 44 days ago

Exactly!

Q
Quincy79 44 days ago

I can see your point. We all tend to identify one area or one player that we think has a bigger influence than others. Personally, I think rugby is usually a bit more complex than that. One player can certainly make a difference, but performances are often the result of how the whole team, coaching, tactics and combinations come together. That's what makes these discussions interesting—we can look at the same game and come away with different conclusions.

H
Hellhound 44 days ago

Saffas are living rent free in that pea brain of yours😂

C
CE 44 days ago

As a Saffa, I personally wait with bated breath for the next nation to win the WC and dominate world rugby. It will certainly happen. Then we can all point fingers at them and their fanbase for their arrogance and “toxic” behaviour. Bring it on!!!

P
PR 45 days ago

DG, I am genuinely interested in the policy RugbyPass has towards Springbok fans because it does seem to be different to other fanbases. You employ someone like Ben Smith who clearly goes out of his way to antagonise Springbok supporters on his socials - something he pretty much does in his RP columns as well. The reasons are obvious. The Boks have a huge fanbase of outspoken fans so you’ll get about 10 times the comments and huge engagement in articles. You are running a business and clicks help pay the bills. You are a South African so do you think it is right or fair to try and bait one particular fanbase for financial gain?

D
DG 44 days ago

hi. Thanks for this. I’m a freelance contributor to RP so I can’t comment on internal policy. What I will say is it’s a broad church. Most of my pieces are complimentary about the Boks though they don’t always attract as much attention. What I’ll say is I’m lucky my editors give me freedom to mostly write what I feel.

I
Itsallacademic 44 days ago

Excellent question! When “a particular New Zealand columnist” does it, RP can argue it is just one person's perspective and the other journalists provide contrasting views so there is balanced reporting.

When it becomes the dominant perspective, it starts pointing towards an editorial policy.


PS. Don't expect a response for RP, at least not a straight forward and/or transparent one.

M
MitchO 45 days ago

Kolbe 2 metres offside charging down that conversion was sheer brilliance

P
PR 45 days ago

Yawn

J
Jacque 45 days ago

Comparing PSTD & Pollock 😂😂😂😂

J
JD 45 days ago

This is what could be perceived as part of the arrogance. Why can’t very good players from both sides be compared? PSDT is an all time great, Pollock is one of the biggest young talents in the world right now. Why not compare them?

M
Mike Griessel (Griessballs On Tour) 45 days ago

Why is it that all reporters generalize about South Africans. You really should get out of your comfort zone and away from Umhlanga (corrected the spelling for you) come to Pirates rugby club or false bay rugby club and not watch with elites but rugby people

D
DG 45 days ago

uMhlanga is a Zulu word that means “place of reeds”. Ive spelled it correctly. Also spent plenty of time at Pirates. Loads of windgat folks there.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close