Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Springboks' biggest critic might be right on this one

South Africa's lock #04 Eben Etzebeth (L) and South Africa's lock #19 RG Snyman (R) carry South Africa's flanker #06 Siya Kolisi at the end of the Autumn Nations Series international rugby union test match between France and South Africa at the Stade de France in Saint-Denis, Paris' suburb, on November 8, 2025. South Africa's history-making captain Siya Kolisi said it was "super special" to become a Test centurion and even more so as his children will be at the Stade de France Saturday when the Springboks play France. (Photo by Anne-Christine POUJOULAT / AFP via Getty Images)

I hate to admit it, but Ben Smith has a point.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Kiwi with the unmatched ability to get under the skins of South African rugby fans, coaches and, yes, even journalists, broke an 11-day silence on X to take aim at the Boks.

“Signing big name Springbok stars is possibly the dumbest deal any overseas club can make,” Smith mused. “All they do is take the money & sandbag themselves, they aren’t going to play much. But all of a sudden they are available [for] internationals. Smells dishonest with zero honour.”

VIDEO

This came a day after it was announced that Pieter-Steph du Toit would be sidelined with a shoulder injury, keeping him out of action until the middle of the year. It meant that the two-time winner of World Rugby’s Player of the Year award would miss the rest of season for his Japanese club, Toyota Verblitz, but would be back in time for the Springboks’ home Nations Championship matches, as well as their series against the All Blacks.

Du Toit has played just three games for his club this season. His first in December was his first club match for 587 days. In that same period he represented his country 16 times.

Smith wasn’t alone in taking aim at what some critics have been pointing out for years. That the truly elite Springboks, those who have lifted two World Cups as well as every other trophy available in the Test game, have not reached the same heights with their clubs.

Siya Kolisi’s stint at Racing 92 was an unmitigated disaster, culminating in the club owner Jacky Lorenzetti calling the Boks skipper “transparent”. Eben Etzebeth’s 40-match spell at Toulon wasn’t quite the same car crash, but it coincided with a barren period for a club that once conquered Europe with the help of South African muscle a generation before.

ADVERTISEMENT

One could cherry-pick other examples. Leicester Tigers routinely shared their frustrations that they never saw the best of Handre Pollard. Cheslin Kolbe, despite winning two Champions Cups and a Top 14 with Toulouse, still divides opinion in Japan where he has blown hot and cold for Suntory Goliath.

So, is Ben Smith right? Not exactly. Because what he’s doing is diagnosing a symptom, not the cause.

The problem isn’t that Springbok stars are dishonest, or that they are consciously “sandbagging” their clubs. It’s that the ecosystem they operate in makes it almost impossible for elite South African internationals to reproduce their Test-level performances week in, week out for overseas teams. And crucially, that ecosystem is unlike anything that exists in England, France, New Zealand or Ireland.

Those nations either restrict overseas selection entirely, or operate under centralised contracts that tether players emotionally and physically to their clubs. A Leinster player cannot treat Ireland as a separate, elevated plane of existence. An All Black has to earn his Test jersey through Super Rugby excellence. Even in France, where the Top 14 is a gravitational force of its own, the national side is fed almost exclusively by domestic form.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa is different. Since the lifting of selection restrictions, the Springboks have become a national team first, and everything else second. Club rugby – even at URC or European level – is no longer the proving ground for those who have already established themselves in the national team. It is the holding pattern. Conditioning blocks, rest protocols and load management are all designed with one aim: peak performance in green and gold.

That doesn’t mean Springboks don’t care about their clubs. But it does mean that the emotional ceiling is fixed. No domestic fixture, no Top 14 derby, no Japanese league playoff can replicate what it feels like to run out at Ellis Park or Loftus wearing a Springbok jersey, knowing the entire rugby country is invested in the outcome. For senior Boks, even those still playing in South Africa, that switch simply cannot be flicked on every Saturday.

Which brings us back to the marquee signings. When clubs like Racing 92 or Toulon signed Kolisi and Etzebeth, they weren’t just buying elite players. They were buying symbols. Leaders. Cultural drivers. These were motivated by commercial interest as much as their potential impact on the pitch. They expected those players to import Springbok intensity wholesale, to lift standards by osmosis, and to dominate in exactly the same way they do at Test level.That expectation was always unrealistic and that’s on the clubs, not the players.

There is one notable exception within South Africa itself. The Stormers, under John Dobson, have managed to extract genuine, sustained excellence from their Springboks. The reason is simple: they have attached the act of playing to representation. Not just of a franchise, but of a city. Cape Town matters to those players. It means something. It gives domestic rugby a narrative weight that most clubs – at home or abroad – simply cannot manufacture. As a result they are comfortably the best South African franchise.

That lesson should matter to overseas recruiters. Signing South Africans is still a superb strategy. They remain central to winning teams across England, France and Japan. But the smart money is not on the crowned kings. It’s on the climbers. The players who need club rugby to elevate themselves, not the ones already assured of Test selection.

Think André Esterhuizen, Wilco Louw, Thomas du Toit and Boan Venter. Before them Faf de Klerk, Franco Mostert and Vincent Koch took their games to higher planes abroad. Cast your eye at any of the top leagues around the world, scroll through the squad lists of the leading sides. Almost certainly there’ll be a South African contributing to the cause. Players on the cusp, or on the fringe, or in need of reinvention. For them, club rugby isn’t a holding pattern – it’s the point.

So yes, Smith is right that some marquee Springbok signings disappoint. But it isn’t dishonour. It’s design. And until overseas clubs stop confusing Springbok fame with Springbok hunger, the cycle will continue, to the benefit of the national team, if not always the one signing the cheque.


Watch all the upcoming SVNS action for FREE on RPTV!
*Available live in select territories

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

61 Comments
P
PMcD 42 days ago

Wow - that’s some claim and in my experience of the English Premiership, it’s absolute nonsense.


In the run up to 2019 RWC we had a lot of South Africans playing in the Premiership.


Let’s start with the props - Koch, Louw & Thomas Du Toit. Each were exceptional for their clubs, Koch is an absolute hero at Saracens and did a great job for Wasps at the end of his career. Louw was loved by Quins fans and had a huge impact during his time with the club & Du Toit plays most weeks and as a Bath fan I can only say how outstanding he has been for us and will be hugely missed.


In the locks we’ve had Lood de Jager, Franco Mostert and J-L Du Preez. All 3 were very good, Lood had a lot of injury issues but the other two were both loved by Gloucester & Sale, played most weeks and put a real shift in.


Back row has seen a combination of Francois Louw, Dan Du Preez, Jasper Wisese & Van Stadden. Francois Louw was Bath’s best player, Wisese was simply immense at Leicester, Dan Du Preez has suffered with injuries and Van Stadden couldn’t get into Leicester’s first team. Not much evidence to support the claim within the article with that lot.


Faf de Klerk was all action and you could probably argue Sale got the very best from Faf. Pollard arrived with injuries and never quite looked his best for Leicester, so they may feel he wasn’t the best value but certainly wasn’t terrible.


Esterheizen has still left a hole at Quins and was simply outstanding.


Then add in Willie Le Roux at Wasps, who played numerous seasons and was very good for Wasps.


So, out of all that lot, Lood de Jager and potentially Handre Pollard are the only ones that even remotely look poor value and the rest have been great servants who were genuinely loved by their fans.


It doesn’t really stack up when you look at it like that and I am afraid the premiership lost a bit of its allure when they all left for higher money in FRA, Japan or SA. Would love to get them all back one day.

R
Rugby Jo 44 days ago

“Let me book myself in for surgery because I don’t feel like playing for my club.” Yep, these Boks are so dishonest. So hard to find something negative on the Boks to write about, let’s target the injured ones and insinuate they are staging it.

J
JC 44 days ago

It’s as simple as this the top European clubs don’t want the marquee or regular bok internationals because they’re basically not getting their money’s worth and getting fleeced. They’ve learned their lessons at a cost. You just have to look at the amount of top SA internationals playing in France, England and Ireland. Gone are the days of Matfield, botha, Kolbe etc….smashing it up for Toulon, Toulouse etc….Bar Synman at Leinster and Thomas du toit at bath there isn’t any more. Klyen and Dweba are on the fringes. You have alot of good pro’s or possible unfounded rough diamonds these are better value. France was always the go too for the money but the kolisi debacle has definitely made owners and investors cuter and wiser. You can understand from a SA point of view not wanting top internationals getting flogged in the top 14 and i’m sure that’s why management have been steering the players towards a sabbatical in Japan playing tag rugby. In fairness it’ll prolong their careers and the Japanese clubs will get money through these players on sponsorship deals, selling products and endorsements. However from a sporting perspective on the pitch they’re getting very little out of alot of them. It seems at the moment this is the best for both sides as the SA international team are flourishing, keeping players fresh and the focus away from club rugby.. While the European teams know where they stand and can invest their money more wisely on commited, consistent and reliable players.

P
PMcD 42 days ago

I think every Premiership club would be happy to sign South African players, the reality is in the current climate they can’t compete with the offers from SA, FRA & Japan, hence the gradual migration.


The Premiership has been focussed on moneyball since Covid, you basically have the best part of £7m to pay 41 players under the salary cap, hence why there are so many academy players filling the squads since Covid.

A
Atlas 44 days ago

Oh wow. BS and his BS. I love the fact that the Boks live in his head rent free.

S
SB 45 days ago

Signing South Africans is still a superb strategy. They remain central to winning teams across England, France and Japan.

Not so much in France.

D
DG 44 days ago

Kolbe won loads with Toulouse. La Rochelle has two Saffas who were central to their European successes.

W
Wayneo 44 days ago

There are lots playing in France, just no big name Springboks that catch the eye.


When it comes to contracting players during and just after school, France are top of the list.

H
Hammer Head 44 days ago

Correct. SA players have done well to avoid France because of the club over country approach over there. Makes perfect sense.

H
Hellhound 45 days ago

What utter crap. Trolling at its best. Tell me little Daniel Gallan, how much did Bulshite pay you to troll with him? Honestly, don't show your intelligence here, because it's clearly non existent. How about doing proper homework? Your ALWAYS WRONG hero say something and poof, you believe it as true. How about doing your own research? Is there no proper journalists left any more?

E
Eric Elwood 44 days ago

Attacking a sports journalist in this ad hominem manner reflects your intelligence not his. Do better.

D
DG 44 days ago

Did you read the whole article or did you just get angry halfway through?

B
Bozlitoh 45 days ago

Alright

R
RugCs 45 days ago

Why was he quiet for 11 days. What happened and what made him crawl out of his hole.

G
Gerard de Waal 44 days ago

Need to flex a little and stretch those hobbit leg🤣

J
JPM 45 days ago

Top 14 clubs have very well learnt their lessons and there is no more playing Bok. The few of them have emigrated to the short Japan league or back to SA. Very strange that World Rugby ignores club rugby when assessing the players strengths.

G
Gerard de Waal 45 days ago

aah the master whinger gives he’s 2 cent worth. 🤣

D
DP 45 days ago

PSDT first joined the club in 2021, that’s 4 years of continued contract renewal. It’s insulting to Japanese clubs to assume they aren’t aware of what’s involved when you sign a double world player of the year or any other world class Bok. Contracts are clear, test duty comes first and injuries are part of the game.

E
Eric Elwood 45 days ago

“Du Toit has played just three games for his club this season. His first in December was his first club match for 587 days. In that same period he represented his country 16 times.”


Its pretty blatant stuff. A Japanese club is basically being used to pay and train a SA international to play just International matches. If PSDT is getting paid an honest wage he should do the job he is being paid for with integrity and honesty.

c
cw 45 days ago

I dont think its dishonest EE. This is not an employee secretly profiting from a company. Clubs are big business and will not give up $ for nothing. In reality the Clubs must consider a player’s brand is worth the investment to hold on to them for extended periods without playing. And for me, a player should prioritise Country over Club. France may never win a World Cup because their players are forced to prioritise Club. Just too bad the Boks aren’t made to do that 😂.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Amazing that professional clubs, their owners, managers, medical staff and financiers are so stupid as not to see what you see. You must be a genius. And they, are not, falling for such blatant and dishonest stuff.


How many marquee players weren't available to the Springboks last year, Turlough, having sustained injuries playing for their clubs?


It cuts both ways.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Ben and this article’s author highlight a handful of Springbok examples of players who have let down their employers abroad. What about other nations players? Did Owen Farrel’s stint at racing 92 slip under the radar? Is PSDT’s case unique enough to be “newsworthy”? Or just jumping on the Ben Smith bandwagon?


For every example one can cite of a bok player stint overseas that didn’t live up to expectations one can name a South African player who has achieved legendary status for clubs abroad - over the decades that South Africans have gone over to earn Euros, Pounds and Yen.


This is why the market for SA players is so strong.


Paying players millions to play rugby is a risky business. Live with it.

P
PMcD 42 days ago

Please see my reply above HH - I’ve given a 6 year overview of what I saw in the Premiership and I promise you those clubs wouldn’t hesitate to sign those same players if they could.


In the case of my club, Thomas Du Toit has been one of our best players, plays most weeks when he is available, occasionally does a shift on both sides of the scrum and has improved the other squad players at the club.


I would actually say he’s been JvG’s best player signing at the club and whilst i will be sorry to see him leave at the end of the season, he has been an outstanding player for the club and we wish him all the best.

G
Gerard de Waal 45 days ago

Mr Elwood is clearly bias, and the fact that he’s nitpicking specific south african player and not going through the whole list of international players playing for clubs and analysling their perceived performances, injuries, verses their salary and ‘worth’ etc, etc, etc…. give me a break. This whole article is a troll and designed to get blokes like me fired up. Ben Smith aka Eric Elwood should focus on the AB’s and the struggles facing the ‘once’ dominant team instead of having a go at injured players. Disgraceful imho.

D
DP 45 days ago

Having a go at Bok players now, trying to deflect from the stench of shite emanating from his All Blacks changeroom - Ardie and Beauden will never live their mutiny down. Hard facts.

M
MM 45 days ago

Hard rumours, not facts!

E
Eric Elwood 45 days ago

“Du Toit has played just three games for his club this season. His first in December was his first club match for 587 days. In that same period he represented his country 16 times.”


Come on…comment on this?

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

How many marquee Bok players currently ply their trade abroad? In Europe? In Japan? The split between Japan and Europe is important.


The number has dwindled. Many big names moved back to SA. Many big names have been signed up to remain in SA. And what remain abroad are mostly in Japan.


And interestingly the best up and comers are almost all in SA and on long term deals.


This tells us that while SARU supports the idea of selecting players from abroad - the strategic goal is to have as many of them in SA as possible.


The system with Japan, in particular, works very well. And is generally win-win. For a variety of reasons. The pay is good. The bodies are sustained and well looked after. The club and international seasons dovetail a little more easily.


Its a great place for more senior players (like PSDT) to play and prolong his career versus smashing his body in Europe or the republic.


The situation with PSDT is unfortunate but given (1) his injury profile - he’s been through hell and (2) his age, it’s insulting to the intelligence of clubs managing multi-million budgets that they don’t understand the risks that come with managing Human Resources who put themselves at medical risk, filling stadiums, chasing after an oval ball, weekly.


What’s more insulting to the intelligence of many more is the clickbaitey opinions of an accountant turned rugby expert from a country who is seeing a spectacular fall from grace in terms of how the game (and their Human Resources) is managed (mismanaged rather) and governed in NZ.


Pipe down, reel your neck in, or just “shut up” feels like the best response one can issue to Ben while he stews through another 18 months of All Black uncertainty.


Discuss.

P
PMcD 42 days ago

It’s been an interesting shift from the Premiership being the preferred location to potentially Japan, which is really down to 3 reasons.


The reality is that SA forwards are the absolute superstars, where there probably have 6/8 in the World XV and there were more forwards playing in England than backs.


1) The Premiership move from 2 marquee players to 1.

When the Premiership allowed 2 marquee players, it was usually a fly half and a forward. Since Covid, when they moved to 1, it’s mainly been fly half, which is harder to fit the other players in a reducing salary cap.


2) FRA Top 14 & Japan have paid higher salaries since Covid

Whist the Premiership clubs took on more debt to fund Covid, both FRA Top 14 & Japan increased their salary levels, whilst the Premiership generally declines (salary levels dropped during Covid).


3) Exchange Rates have had a large impact

In addition to the above, the movement of the Rand, GBP, Euro & Yen further amplified the benefit of Euro & Yen earnings at the expense of the pound. Since 2021/2 - it was an absolute no brainer to move to FRA or Japan and with exchange rate, you could earn 50% more per season.


Slowly these things will change, the Premiership may take another 5 years to repair its reputation as a preferred destination but hopefully it happens as the league was better for having these players than not.


It’s pretty straight forward when you think it through logically.

R
RickyBobby38 44 days ago

Kiwi here, so don’t shoot ayy 👐


I was reading “pipe down", “reel your neck in" & “shut up" with my approximation of a South African accent in mind & it was glorious, so many so-called rugby experts/pundits down here need short sharp reminders like these (tbf most of the goobers at NZR need the same treatment - but that's a whole other topic).


I have to ask, do they sound better in Afrikaans or are you guys hiding the better Afrikaans phrases from us?


I do find it hilarious that BS & whoever regurgitated his musings in this “article" (we thought sport journos were lazy back in the day, modern day ones out here like “hold my beer, I need both hands to scroll X to write my article for me") are complaining about overseas-based Bok players & their unique situations - I've seen other articles down here suggesting NZR drop the archaic selection policy & essentially follow the Bok blueprint in allowing our players to take contracts with the big money overseas clubs (save NZR a chunk of their limited funds & put it towards signing & developing the next generations of players).


Sorry for the disorganized walls of text - still not as shambolic as whatever NZR are trying to so these days ay 😅

G
Gerard de Waal 44 days ago

SPOT ON H.H! Nothing worst than a bitter, whining Kiwi. Love their players, despise their supporters.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close
ADVERTISEMENT