Pre-match analysis - Italy vs Ireland
Leaving Stadio Olimpico in 2013 after Italy had magically ambushed Ireland in the mid-March afternoon sun, you’d never have predicted the gulf that now exists between these two counties.
The difference is night and day. Ireland are now in the frame to potentially win the 2019 World Cup. Meanwhile, the brickbats continue to mount concerning the Italians’ automatic participation in a Six Nations tournament where they haven’t won a match since 2015.
While that barren stretch will extend to 20 once their latest defeat materialises, Sunday will at least offer Italy a glimpse of life after talisman Sergio Parisse. It’s rare that the veteran ever misses a match, but his concussion last weekend while on Top 14 duty with Stade Francais means he can’t line out and how his team improvises in his absence will be interesting.
They have been smashed in their past four meetings with Ireland, the margin of defeat an embarrassing 43, 53, 37 and 47 and the try-count is a horrible seven to 34 against them.
That run suggests another pelting is on the horizon as Ireland prepare to launch themselves back into the 2019 Six Nations title race in front on an expected crowd in excess of 50,000.
(Continue reading below…)
COACHES
Joe Schmidt and Conor O’Shea are good coffee buddies even though they are operating at different ends of the international rugby spectrum with vastly different resources at their disposal.
With just a half-dozen wins in 30 outings (20 percent), O’Shea would be well within his rights given this disparity to begrudge the talent and the finance backing up the Schmidt regime compared to his financially straitened existence with an Azzurri waiting on a generation of youth to filter through the ranks of a system that is being slowly overhauled.
Dean Budd's emotional Six Nations tribute to his step-dad Pete ??????? https://t.co/fuBDJalUtx
— RugbyPass (@RugbyPass) February 21, 2019
Instead, the Irishman came out this week as one of the New Zealand’s most avid supporters, dismissing how so many Irish people turned on their team and their coach on the basis of one off-kilter performance against England at the start of the tournament.
That stinging reaction to the English loss was typical of the cyclical boom or bust domestic assessment of Irish rugby, a perspective all too often bereft of balance.
It’s something Schmidt, who has won 47 and drawn one of his 64 matches (74.2 percent) has struggled to become accustomed to in his six years in charge, but the prognosis will be back in boom territory once more after he unleashes his latest plan to tear the Azzurri to shreds.
For whatever reason, O’Shea has struggled to come up with credible damage limitation plans against a mentor he regular picks the brain of and will likely get bogged down again in Rome in this latest rendezvous.
PLAYERS
Braam Steyn (62) vs Jordi Murphy (75)
This is Steyn’s eighth start in 13 Six Nations appearances and it’s his biggest yet as he has been handed the Italian No8 shirt vacated by the concussed Parisse. He has much on his plate if he is to fill that shirt responsibly and close the Rugby Player Index gap between him and Murphy, who is a far better-rated operator even though he has only started twice in his last eight Ireland appearances. Murphy has been enjoying a new lease of club life at Ulster following his summer switch from Leinster and the expectation is his jackal (83) and snaffle (78) skills will far outshine what Steyn has to offer in these departments (75 and 57 ratings).
Leonardo Ghiraldini (72) vs Sean Cronin (88)
A gulf in form exists here. Cronin is rated the fifth best in the world of the 256 hookers ranked in the RugbyPass RPI, a status 49 places ahead of his Italian counterpart. However, despite this favourable billing, Cronin must look enviously at the greater Test exposure Ghiraldini has enjoyed. Sunday is the Italian’s 83rd start in 102 appearances, a hulking figure compared to Cronin looking forward to only his 10th start in 68 appearances. Such is the excruciating reality of Test life when playing second fiddle to first-choice Rory Best. Still, Cronin’s influence on a match (90, according to the RPI) far outweighs what Ghiraldini is bringing to this party (68) and he will be influential here even though the Italian has the better lineout score (76 to 73).
Tommaso Allan (60) vs Johnny Sexton (91)
Another chalk and cheese head-to-head as Sexton, ranked second best of the 17 Six Nations out-halves under the RPI microscope, checks in a dozen places higher than Allan whose only clear current edge on the Irishman is in the territorial kick metres category (85 to 58). Life hasn’t been pretty for Sexton since he lost the run of himself as Leinster skipper in their post-Christmas league loss at rivals Munster. Injuries have left him short of form which is why he is starting a fixture that would otherwise have been earmarked as an opportunity for an understudy to get a run-out. That development will allow Allan to get a close-up lesson in how form is temporary and class is permanent.
Jimmy Tuivati (49) vs Peter O’Mahony (93)
Tuivati is a lovely personable bloke. Check out the acclaimed RugbyPass This is Zebre documentary for proof about his easy-on-the-ear likability. However, his cordial way with words is about to encounter the nightmare that is O’Mahony’s on-pitch gruffness and a rough-and-ready playing style that takes no prisoners. Making just his first Italian start after three caps as a sub, Tuivati, the New Zealander who qualifies under residency rules, is rated 167 of the 188 blindsides in the RPI index. Given that O’Mahony occupies second place, the expectation is for a one-sided battle, especially as the Irishman, with regular captain Best rested, is a passionate skipper who will quickly ramp up the tempo.
Key battlegrounds
Italy’s defence has appeared a tighter unit in this season’s opening rounds compared to 2018, leaking only seven tries against the 15 of a year ago. Of course, Scotland and Wales don’t pose the same attacking threat as England and Ireland, their first two opponents last term, but it’s encouraging all the same that they appear to be better connected on the backfoot.
What would further help is having more time on the ball in enemy territory. The Italians have encouragingly taken their tries in recent weeks, suggesting their creativity is improving, but foundations will need to laid in the tight if they are to cause Ireland much, if any, concern.
Off we go. #TeamOfUs #ITAvIRE #shouldertoshoulder pic.twitter.com/4xW4x6R9oV
— Irish Rugby (@IrishRugby) February 22, 2019
With Schmidt opting to alter half of his starting pack, the Italians could create problems if they start well. There are scrummaging questions to be asked of Dave Kilcoyne, lineout queries that need answering about the Ultan Dillane-Quinn Roux axis.
The fear for Italy is Ireland clicking at half-back. Their Sexton-Conor Murray combination has never been as uninspired-looking as it is now, so there is great onus is on Allan and Tito Tebaldi to be aggressive, to get in their faces and try and make a contest of a fixture that everyone, bar those in the inner Italian sanctum, would feel is already a foregone conclusion.
Conclusion
Unlike in 2015, when Ireland gouged ugly World Cup and Six Nations wins over Italy, that competitiveness has been absent in their past four meetings. Bar a three-try garbage time response in Dublin last year, the final quarter of these matches have been a major issue for the Azzurri as Schmidt is in the habit of unleashing a bench that runs the opposition ragged.
Ireland have scored 73 to Italy’s 24 points in the last 20 minutes, 11 tries to four, and while their replacements on this occasion includes a novice half-back partnership in John Cooney, who only has a half-dozen caps, and the uncapped Jack Carty, the presence of Lions forwards Jack McGrath and Iain Henderson illustrates the calibre of other players Schmidt has in reserve.
Italy have been pleased they have been competitive in their losses so far against Scotland and Wales, just 13 and 11 points being the respective margins of defeat in encounters where the try count has been only five scored and seven conceded.
That suggests structural improvement under O’Shea but minus talisman Parisse, they will have their work cut-out to be anywhere near Ireland who have had four tries on the board by the 39th, 34th, 35th and 45th minute in recent head-to-heads. Expect another early bonus to fall Ireland’s way as they play their way back into the title race.
Comments on RugbyPass
Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause
6 Go to commentsNo way. If you are trying to picture New Zealand rugby with an All Blacks mindset, there have been two factors instrumental to the decline of NZ rugby to date. Those are the horror that the Blues have become and, probably more so, the fixture that the Crusaders became. I don’t think it was healthy to have one team so dominant for so long, both for lack of proper representation of players from outside that environment and on the over reliance on players from within it. If you are another international side, like Ireland for example, sure. You can copy paste something succinct from one level to the next and experience a huge increase in standards, but ultimately you will not be maximizing it, which is what you need to perform to the level the ABs do. Added to that is the apathy that develops in the whole game as a result of one sides dominance. NZ, Super, and Championship rugby should all experience a boom as a result of things balancing out. That said, there is a lot of bad news happening in NZ rugby recently, and I’m not sure the game can be handled well enough here to postpone the always-there feeling of inevitable decline of rugby.
6 Go to commentsNo SA supporter miss Super Rugby - a product that is experiencing significant head wind in ANZ - the competition from rival codes are intense, match attendance figures are at a historical low and the negativity of commentators such as Kirwan and Wilson have accelerated the downward spiral in NZ. After the next RWC in 2027 sponsors will follow Qantas and start leaving in droves.
2 Go to commentsLike others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
6 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
6 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
2 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to comments