Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Owen Farrell hits back after 'hothead' claims

By Online Editors
Owen Farrell. Photo / Getty Images.

England captain Owen Farrell has dismissed the ‘hothead’ claim made by former Ireland halfback Peter Stringer earlier this week.

ADVERTISEMENT

The ongoing war of words between the two nations has rolled into the eve of their colossal Six Nations opener in Dublin, with the likes of England head coach Eddie Jones, defence coach John Mitchell, and Ireland head coach Joe Schmidt all throwing verbal shots at one another in the week leading up to the clash.

Stringer was among those to get involved, labelling Farrell – a former teammate during his brief loan spell at Saracens in 2011 – as a ‘hothead’.

“Eddie will have them fired up, and you see the likes of Owen Farrell: he’s in charge of everything they do, being captain and having all that responsibility, but he is a hothead,” he told Sky Sports on Tuesday.

“I’ve played with him, he loves that physical side of things, but you can get under his skin, you can rattle him. He is a guy they’ll be looking to get after.

“If things go well for Farrell, on the front foot he’s a great player but going backward he’s a guy who loses the rag completely, which you don’t want from your captain.”

https://www.instagram.com/p/BtVRzQxgEKc/

Speaking to The Guardian a day out from the eagerly-anticipated contest, Farrell questioned the credibility of Stringer’s comments, saying that his personal growth over the past eight years have made him a different person to the one that played with the former 98-test star.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t know how long ago it is I played with Strings; it seems like a long time ago,” he said.

“I don’t know if he thinks I’ve not changed. He’s entitled to his opinion. I’m competitive, I’ll look to do my job on the field and that’s all that matters.

“Everyone has changed, haven’t they? Everyone tries to get better, everyone tries to grow. I’m happy with how I am and the way things are going.”

Farrell also emphasised the importance of keeping a cool head while bringing a necessary level of physicality and aggression, especially when playing in high-stake matches away from home.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s always a balance … being clear-headed but being aggressive and as combative as you need to be,” the 27-year-old said.

“It’s a passionate place with a passionate crowd and they’re a passionate team. You’ve seen from those big Munster nights and the big Leinster nights in Dublin how tough those places are to go.

“That probably says you need to get your start right, stick in the fight and take it to them. They’re a tough team and it’ll be a tough game but we can’t wait to play them.”

Farrell has overcome injury concerns about his thumb to start at first-five for the eagerly-anticipated match, which kicks off on Saturday at 4:45pm local time.

Rugby World Cup City Guides – Oita:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 15 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Israel Dagg blasts Crusaders, weighs in on Rob Penney's future Dagg blasts Crusaders, debates Penney's future
Search