Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

New Zealand fans incensed as RWC broadcast provider Spark Sports struggles in first New Zealand Test

By Tom Vinicombe
Springboks flanker Pieter-Steph du Toit. (Photo by Mike Hewitt / Getty Images)

New Zealand’s broadcasting world received somewhat of a shake-up last year when it was announced that Spark, one of the country’s major telecommunications providers, had won the rights to the Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sky Sport, who owned the New Zealand rights to most of the major rugby competitions around the world, had been the key broadcast partners for the previous two tournaments and the switch to Spark for the World Cup was seen as a relative coup for the ‘little man’.

There was, however, some trepidation – given that Spark have never previously been tasked with broadcasting a live experience on such a major scale. There were also concerns that many rugby fans would not get to view the World Cup as they either lacked highspeed internet (in the more rural areas) or lacked internet access at all, as is the case with many older viewers.

Still, fans have remained hopeful that come the hour, Spark Sports would stand up to the intense pressure it would be placed under.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

When the tournament kicked off on Friday night, a number of users took to Twitter to vent their frustrations. Broadcast quality was choppy at times for some viewers, whilst others found they weren’t able to access the broadcast at all.

Naturally, it’s the unhappy few that are most likely to vent their issues on social media and Friday night’s issues were apportioned to just a vocal minority of users.

Come Saturday night, however, when the All Blacks played their first Test of the World Cup, things took a turn for the worse.

ADVERTISEMENT

Spark Sports users took to Twitter to showcase the range of issues they were facing:

As was announced prior to the tournament’s kick-off, Spark had a back-up plan in place should the service not be up to the required standard. Twenty minutes into the match, the game was made available on free-to-air TV  for all.

Whilst viewers appreciated the alternative option, they were also quick to chastise Spark’s suggestion that it was just a “small percentage” of customers who were affected.

ADVERTISEMENT

The next All Blacks match won’t take place for another week and a half, and there’s likely to be far fewer viewers tuning into the match against Canada than there were against New Zealand’s highest-ranked pool opposition, the Springboks.

Chances are that the next massive workload that Spark will face won’t eventuate until the quarter-finals, which gives the company plenty of time to sort out their issues – whether it’s an easy fix, however, remains unknown.

Last night, Spark released a statement indicating that they were “uncomfortable at the quality” of their service and would be doing all they could to alleviate the issues.

Regardless, Spark’s reputation will have taken a massive hit thanks to the problems faced by so many customers, and trust will be at an all-time low.

Spark gaining the rights to the World Cup was considered a huge boon for the company, but it looks like the win may come back to bite them.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 4 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

3 Go to comments
M
Mzilikazi 7 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle
Search