Nelson could be the Pumas home away from home
Playing at home has always been touted as a major advantage in sports.
Whilst nothing conclusive has ever been produced, a number of potential explanations exist: home teams are galvanised by their local supporters cheering them on, home teams are more used to the local environment (weather, turf etc.), home teams are obviously playing in their local time zone and suffer little travel time, and maybe the mere expectation that teams will play better at home plays a part in the increased success too.
Of course, playing at home isn’t always a recipe for victory. The ghosts of past expectations have crushed many a team in the past. In this year’s rendition of Super Rugby, for example, the Blues managed only one win at home but earned three on the road. Given the comparative lack of support that the Auckland based squad gets when compared to New Zealand’s other teams, it must almost be more demoralising playing in front of a home crowd for Blues players than playing overseas.
In some cases, teams aren’t actually suited to their home turf at all. Whilst you do normally see teams who are used to hard, dry surfaces showing a bit more razzle-dazzle with the ball in hand (compare Super Rugby teams with their European counterparts, who normally play much of the season in the wet of winter), there are many exceptions to the rule. Some of the South African teams, in particular, play rugby much more suited to the conditions of the Northern Hemisphere (just one more reason why it’s no surprise to see more SA teams ready to jump into the Pro14), even though their turfs are well suited for running rugby.
There are also teams who seem better equipped at adjusting their style to suit the conditions. New Zealand and Ireland, the two best teams in the world at present, have many strings to their bow. In New Zealand’s case, however, rarely do they actually get to play on a flat, hard surface, with most of their test matches falling during relatively soggy periods of the year.
In particular, the Rugby Championship falls smack bang in the middle of winter for the partaking nations – not as big a deal for Australia, South Africa and Argentina, where the winters are a bit drier, but matches in New Zealand tend to, more often than not, be wet affairs.
Barring the odd match in Dunedin, New Zealand has typically had to settle for forward-oriented games in their home Rugby Championship matches. Although the All Blacks may be competent at forward-based play, their comparative advantage is definitely in the more free-roaming, counter-attacking play – play which is considerably more challenging in the rain.
In contrast, the Pumas are a team that tends to thrive on the more combative close-quarters play. That’s not to suggest they don’t have gamebreakers all over the field – far from it – but Argentina tends to lack a little bit of finesse at times, whereas they are never short of hard-grafting, mountain shifting forwards.
It’s no surprise then, that the Pumas will be targeting this weekend’s match up against New Zealand in Nelson as an opportunity to finally get a win over the men in black. In 26 matches Argentina has yet to come out on top at the end of 80 minutes – but they’ve certainly started strongly in some of the more recent matches.
In 2017, Argentina took a 16-15 lead into the break at Yarrow Stadium in Taranaki. The Pumas actually managed to push out to a 7-point lead before succumbing 39-22 at the end of the match. One year earlier, the Pumas were leading until the 32 nd minute and were within one score of the All Blacks at the 54th. In 2015, again, everything was all square between the two teams at halftime. The Pumas have shown time and time again that, on a slower track, they’re more than capable of trading blows with New Zealand – they just fall away as the game wears on.
Certainly, there are a few areas where Argentina will feel they may have the wood on New Zealand. Their scrum is more dominant now than it was this time last year, thanks to the handy addition of Juan Figallo. As always, the Pumas also have a very strong loose forward trio – a trio that easily outperformed their Springbok counterparts in Mendoza. It’s also worth factoring in the sizeable win that the Pumas secured in Mendoza – playing at home may have its advantages, but nothing strengthens a team like an unexpected and well-deserved win against more fancied opposition.
There’s also plenty of talk of the All Blacks selectors rolling out a number of changes for the upcoming weekend. Young, less experienced players will of course be eager to impress, but Argentina will be quick to take advantage of any overly ambitious plays in the wet.
Nelson may not be due for rain in the next few days, but there will inevitably be a heavy dew hanging over the stadium when the All Blacks and the Pumas line-up on Saturday, as is tradition in New Zealand winters. In contrast, the return leg match in Buenos Aires will likely be a hot, relatively dry affair that will give both teams the opportunity to run with the ball. The environment in Argentina will almost inevitably lead to the Pumas taking to their backs to make ground – which is the kind of play that the All Blacks are very good at punishing.
Argentina may never have beaten New Zealand, but with the increased number of regular games happening between the teams, it will inevitably happen in the near future. Contrary to what most may expect, however, this may be a hoodoo that Argentina is more likely to break away from home.
In other news:
Comments on RugbyPass
A wallaby front-row of Bell, Blake and Tupou…now that would be hefty
1 Go to comments“But with an exceptional pass accuracy rating “ Which apart from Roigard is not a feature of any of the other 9s in NZ. Kind of basic for a Black 9 dont.you. think? Yet we keep seeing FC and TJ being rated ahead of him? Weird if it’s seen as vital to get our backline beating in your face defences.
1 Go to commentsThanks BeeMc! Looks like many teams need extra time to settle from the quadrennial northern migration. I think generally the quality of the Rugby has held up. Fiji has been fantastic and fun to watch
13 Go to commentsLets compare apples with apples. Lyon sent weak team the week before, but nobody raised an eyebrow. Give the South African teams a few years to build their depth, then you will be moaning that the teams are too strong.
41 Go to commentsDid footballs agents also perform the scout role at some time? I’m surprised more high profile players haven’t taken up the occupation, great way to remain in the game and use all that experience without really requiring a lot of specific expertise?
1 Go to commentsSuper rugby is struggling but that has little to do with sabbaticals. 1. Too many teams from Aust and NZ - should be 3 and 4 respectively, add in 2 from Japan, 1 possibly 2 from Argentina. 2. Inconsistent and poor refereeing, admittedly not restricted to Super rugby. Only one team was reffed at the breakdown in Reds v H’Landers match. Scrum penalty awarded in Canes v Drua when No 8 had the ball in the open with little defence nearby - ideal opportunity to play advantage. Coming back to Reds match - same scrum situation but ref played advantage - Landers made 10 yards and were penalised at the breakdown when the ref should have returned to scrum penalty. 3. Marketing is weak and losing ground to AFL and NRL. Playing 2 days compared with 4. 4. Scheduling is unattractive to family attendance. Have any franchises heard of Sundays 2pm?
11 Go to commentsAbsolutely..all they need is a chance in yhe playoffs and I bet all the other teams will be nervous…THEY KNOW HOW TO WIN IM THE PLAYOFFS..
2 Go to commentsI really hope he comes back and helps out with some coaching.
1 Go to commentsI think we are all just hoping that the Olympic 7s doesn’t suffer the same sad fate as the last RWC with the officials ruining the spectacle.
1 Go to commentsPersonally, I’ve lost the will to even be bothered about the RFU, the structure, the participants. It’s all a sham. I now simply enjoy getting a group of friends together to go and watch a few games a year in different locations (including Europe, the championship, etc). I feel extremely sorry for the real fans of these clubs who are constantly ignored by the RFU and other administrators. I feel especially sorry for the fans of clubs in the Championship who have had considerable central funding stripped away and are then expected to just take whatever the RFU put to them. Its all a sham, especially if the failed clubs are allowed to return.
10 Go to commentsI’m guessing Carl Hayman would have preferred to have stayed in NZ with benefit of hindsight. Up north there is the expectation to play twice as many games with far less ‘player management’ protocols that Paul is now criticising. Less playing through concussions means longer, healthier, careers. Carter used as the eg here by Paul, his sabbatical allowed him to play until age 37. OK its not an exact science but there is far more expectations on players who sign for Top 14 or Engl Prem clubs to get value for the huge salaries. NZR get alot wrong but keeping their best players in NZ rugby is not one of them. SA clubs are virtually devoid of their top players now, no thanks. They cant threaten the big teams in the Champions Cup, the squads have little depth. Cant see Canes/Chiefs struggling. Super has been great this year, fantastic high skill matches. Drua a fantastic addition and Jaguares will add another quality team eventually. Aus teams performing strongly and no doubt will benefit with the incentive of a Lions tour and a home RWC. Let Jordie enjoy his time with Leinster, it will allow the opportunity for another player to emerge at Canes in his absence.
11 Go to commentsLove that man, his way to despise angry little men is so funny ! 😂
4 Go to comments“South African franchises would be powerhouses if we had all our overseas based players back in situ. We would have the same unbeatable aura the Toulouses, Leinsters or Saracens of this world have had over the last decade or so.” Proof that Jake white does not understand the economics of the game in SA. Players earning abroad are not going to simply come back and represent the bulls. But they might if they have a springbok contract.
24 Go to commentsA lot of fans just joined in for the fun of it! We all admire O'Gara and what he has done for La Rochelle
4 Go to commentsThe RFU will find a way to mess this up as usual. My bet is there will be no promotion into the the Premiership, only relegation into National League One. Hopefully they won’t parachute failed clubs into the league at the expense of clubs who have battled for promotion.
10 Go to commentsWell that’s the contracts for RG and Jordie bought and paid for. Now, what are the chances we can persuade Antoine to hop over with all the extra dosh we’ll have from living at the Aviva & Croke next season…??? 🤑🤑🤑
35 Go to commentsWow, that’s incredible. Great for rugby.
35 Go to commentsYou probably read that parling is going to coach the wallaby lineout but if not before now you have.
17 Go to commentsIf someone like Leo Cullen was in O’Gara’s place I don’t hear Boo-ing. It’s not just that La Rochelle has hurt Leinster and O’Gara is their Irish boss. It’s the needle that he brings and the pantomime activity before the game around pretending that Munster were supporting LaRochelle just because O’Gara is from Cork. That’s dividing Irish provinces just to get an advantage for his French Team. He can F*ck right off with that. BOOOOO! (but not while someone is lying injured)
4 Go to commentsDid the highlanders party too hard before the game? They were the pits.
1 Go to comments