Neil Best: Sentence first, verdict afterwards
The final verdict on the Belgium v Spain debacle has highlighted some problems for World Rugby – not least because World Rugby supported the Spanish position and themselves argued before the joint Disputes and Judicial Committee that the match should be replayed.
Spain’s complaint covered several issues including referee neutrality – yet the same referee took charge of the return fixture of Spain v Belgium earlier in qualification – the refusal to change referee when requested to do so, the pitch dimensions, the fact they didn’t get a Captain’s run and maybe most importantly the refereeing performance itself.
World Rugby took the position that there was no refereeing bias but that Spain’s request prior to the fixture for a change or referee should have been agreed by Rugby Europe, and this warranted a replay.
And despite not arguing there was bias World Rugby provided the joint Committee with a report on the referee’s performance which concluded that it had been “poor, not up to usual standards, and had focussed on refereeing one team and ignoring the other.”
Of course, the Committee were in the end unable to interfere with on-field decisions in the absence of proven bias -which was something World Rugby didn’t feel they could allege. That meant World Rugby bizarrely presented an argument that couldn’t achieve the outcome they made clear they wanted.
That left the Committee with an eligibility can of worms to resolve and within it an opportunity to remove the Spain/Romania conflict. The simple solution was neither would go to the Japan ball for eligibility failings.
Russia and Germany were cleared of any wrongdoing. But Belgium used five players under their own version of the grandparent rule and the “Belgian great-grandparent rule” cost them a points deduction and a substantial fine -that had it not been suspended would have left the Union on serious financial thin ice.
Spain fought their corner but were found to have used two players in several matches that had been previously “captured” by France -having played for the French Under-20s. Points deduction and Spain out.
Romania had issues with one player, again previously captured, this time via the Tongan Sevens. And although the Romanians did produce evidence of making some efforts to check eligibility, transgressions are strict liability and the Romanians too found themselves with points deducted and out of qualifying. Who would have thought Wikipedia or ESPN – yes these were two of the checks cited – could be wrong?
Continue reading below
The entire process ended in no replay. And all Unions involved in the potential replay out of qualification. In a way this avoided more difficult questions and produced an acceptable outcome of sorts.
Going forward it’s clearly in World Rugby’s interest to minimise the risk of future qualification being determined in a courtroom or by a tribunal. It’s also clear that many smaller Unions don’t always have the capacity to make comprehensive eligibility checks on previously captured players.
At the end of the Joint Committee’s decision they make comment that doesn’t feature in World Rugby’s statement in response “World Rugby might want to consider whether to maintain a database showing players who have been captured by Unions.” I’d put it a little higher than “might want to consider”, I think they should and make it accessible to Unions.
Just as it’s not good enough for Unions to conduct eligibility checks on Wikipedia, it’s not good enough for World Rugby to receive team lists for one or two years and make no checks or offer any response as to eligibility. Delegating exists to compliment taking responsibility not to replace it.
You can wipe out your opponents. But if you do it unjustly you become eligible for being wiped out yourself.
In other news:
Comments on RugbyPass
Bar the injuries, it’s pretty much their top team …
2 Go to commentsDon’t disagree with much of this but it appears you forgot Rodda and Beale, who started at the Force on the weekend.
9 Go to commentsExcept for the injured Zach Gallagher this would be Saders best forward pack for the season. Blackadder needs to stay at 7, for all of Christies tackling he is not dominant and offers very little else. McNicholfullback is maybe a good option, Fihaki not really upto it, there was a reason Burke played there last year. Maybe Havilli to 2nd five McLeod to wing. Need a strong winger on 1 side to compliment Reece
1 Go to commentsTo me TJ is clearly the best 9 in the competition right now but he's also a proven player off the bench, there's few playmaking players who can come off the bench as calm and settled as he is, Beauden can, TJ can and I doubt any of the scrumhalves in contention can, if they want to experiment with new 9s I want him on the bench ready to step in if they crumble under the pressure. The Boks put their best front row on the bench, I'd like to see us take a similar approach, the Hurricanes have been doing similar things with players like Kirifi.
35 Go to commentsROG has better chance to win a WC if he starts training and make himself eligible as a player. He won’t make the Ireland squad but I reckon he may get close with Namibia (needs to improve his Afrikaans) or Portugal. Both sides had 1000:1 odds to win the RWC in 2023 which is an improvement on ROG’s odds of winning a RWC as a coach. Unlike Top 14 teams, national teams can’t go shopping and buy the best players - you work with the available talent pool and turn them into world beaters.
2 Go to commentsthat backline nope that backline is terrible why would you have sevu Reece when he’s not even top 5 wingers in the comp why have Blackadder when there’s better players no Scott barret isn’t an automatic the guy is more of a liability than anything why have him there when you have samipeni who’s far far better
35 Go to commentsAh, good to find you Nick. Agree with everything about Cale. So much to like about his game
49 Go to commentsNot too bad. Questions at 6, lock and HB for me. The ABs will be a lot stronger once Jordan and Roigard return. Also, work needs to be made to secure Frizzell back for next season and maybe also Mo’unga; they’re just wasting time playing in japan
35 Go to commentsOn the title, i wonder for many of those people it is a case something like a belief in working smarter, not harder?
1 Go to commentsForget Sotutu. One of those whose top level is Super Rugby. Id take a punt on Wallace Sititi Finau ahead of Glass body Blackadder.
35 Go to commentsI’m a pensioner so I've been around a bit. My opinion of SBW is he is an elite athlete and a great New Zealander and roll model. He has been to the top and knows what he's talking about. To all the negative comments regarding SBW the typical New Zealand way, cut that tall poppy down.
17 Go to commentsI'm not listening to a guy moralise over others when this is the guy who walked out mid season on Canterbury RLFC when he had a contract with them, what a hypocrite. All the Kiwis sticking up for this unprincipled individual because they can't accept justified criticism, he has zero credibility or integrity. Those praising him are a joke.
17 Go to commentsI’d put Finau at 6 instead of Blackadder but that’s the only change I’d make. Can’t wait to see who Razor picks.
35 Go to commentsTamati Williams, Codie Taylor, and Same Cane? Not sure about Hoskins Sotutu at test level. Wasn’t that impressive last season. Need a balance between experience and talent/youth.
35 Go to commentsInteresting insight. Fantastic athlete, and a genuine human being.
17 Go to commentsThey played at night in Suva last weekend and it’s an afternoon game forecast for 19 degrees in Canberra this weekend. Heat change is a non issue.
2 Go to commentsWishing Rosie a speedy recovery
1 Go to commentsObscene that SA haven’t been knocking
1 Go to commentsChances of Blackadder being injured seem too high to give him serious consideration. ABs loosie combination finally looked good with 2 committed to tackling and clearing rucks in the centre and Ardie roaming. Hoskins/Ardie together would force one of them into where they don’t excel and don’t get to use their talent, or require a change in tactics. If we continue to evolve last years systems I would take Papali’i and Finau at 6 and 7 (conceding that Blackadder will be injured) and Ardie at 8.
35 Go to commentsArdie’s preferred position 7? Where do they get these writers from? I've no idea where he's playing in Japan, but the previous two seasons he wore the 7 jersey exactly twice.
18 Go to comments