Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Leicester Tigers' brutal season hasn't left their bank balance unscathed

By Alex Shaw
Even the fervent support Tigers enjoy has not been enough to prevent increasing losses. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Away from the Rugby World Cup, domestic rugby is beginning to whir into action across Europe and one of English rugby’s giants, Leicester Tigers, have released their financial statement for the financial year ending on June 30th, 2019.

ADVERTISEMENT

The club recorded its highest ever revenues in 2018 when they broke the £20m barrier and registered a total revenue of £20.4m, although it was not enough to prevent a pre-tax loss of £991,000.

Boosted by the largest attendances in English rugby, Leicester’s financial situation has long been a healthy one, though they have spent the last three years recording pre-tax losses, with that figure having been increasing since the end of the 2014/15 financial year.

Despite again managing to record a revenue of £20m – a decrease of £400,000 from 2018 – Tigers’ pre-tax losses have increased, with the club filing a deficit of just over £1.9m for the 2018/19 year. It is not the most positive news for Leicester, who announced plans to sell the club earlier this year.

One of the major contributors to this drop in revenue and subsequent increase in losses was a drop in rugby income. The figure stood at £5.4m in Leicester’s revenues in 2018 and that number has dropped to £4.9m for the most recent year. A reduction of almost 500 season ticket holders – from 14,027 in 2018 to 13,538 in 2019 – has been one of the main influences.

Video Spacer

Other areas of the club also suffered, with sponsorship and conference and events revenue all also down, the latter of which has resulted in Tigers opting to appoint a new external organisation, Compass, to oversee all public and corporate services on matchdays, as well as non-matchday conference and events operations.

One area in which there was a positive move was the income the club garners from Premier Rugby Limited (PRL), which rose from £6.1m in 2018 to £6.5m in 2019, although it was not enough to offset the others losses in income and a modest increase in staff costs.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 2018/19 Gallagher Premiership season heralded the arrival of CVC as a shareholder in PRL, with the member clubs hoping that the funding provided by the private equity firm would help lay the groundwork for a more commercially successful future.

It is too soon to see any potential positive or negative consequences to the move on the balance sheet, but clubs up and down the Premiership will hope to see those losses begin to diminish, rather than increase, in the coming years.

Watch: Eddie Jones and Owen Farrell are both positive after England’s win over Tonga

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 18 minutes ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

1 Go to comments
M
Mzilikazi 3 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
S
Sam T 9 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

9 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE France and All Blacks in tug of war over latest star from New Caledonia France and All Blacks in tug of war over latest star from New Caledonia
Search