Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Leicester explain why they won't appeal the Michael Cheika ban

Leicester boss Michael Cheika (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Leicester have opted not to appeal the suspension given this week to Michael Cheika. The head coach was charged with disrespecting an independent match day doctor following the September 21 Gallagher Premiership win at Exeter.

ADVERTISEMENT

He was subsequently called to attend a virtually held disciplinary hearing on Tuesday night and after it emerged on Wednesday lunchtime he was to be banned for two matches, with one game suspended until the end of the current season, Tigers said they wanted to see the full written judgement before on deciding their next move.

That 12-page document was finally published on Thursday evening and while they still “respectfully disagree” with the decision by the panel that the post-game actions of Cheika at Sandy Park were disrespectful, they have now decided not to appeal the suspension which prevents the coach from having match day involvement when they visit Kingston Park on Saturday.

A Friday evening statement read: “After careful consideration, Leicester Tigers have decided not to appeal the sanction imposed against Michael Cheika by an independent disciplinary panel on Tuesday evening.

“The head coach received a two-week suspension, with one week suspended until the end of the 2024/25 season, and will now miss Saturday’s Gallagher Premiership away game against Newcastle Falcons. Michael will be back for the home game against Northampton Saints in round four.

Fixture
Gallagher Premiership
Newcastle
10 - 42
Full-time
Leicester
All Stats and Data

“After only receiving the full judgement on Thursday evening and consulting internally, it was felt that an appeal was not in the best interests of moving on from this matter.

“The club accepts that a number of errors took place in the HIA process during the round one fixture, which was acknowledged during the hearing by both the Leicester Tigers medical staff and the independent match day doctor, but it wishes to stress that it has the utmost confidence in all of our staff and their care for players.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We believe that the very unusual circumstances, which were acknowledged by the panel and that led to the mistakes in the process, warranted an explanation post-match and therefore respectfully disagree with the decision by the panel to conclude that those actions amounted to disrespect. The club will be seeking clarification from the RFU on any similar future situations should they arise.”

  • Click here to read the full 12-page Michael Cheika disciplinary hearing written verdict

Related

Women's Rugby World Cup 2025 tickets

The Women's Rugby World Cup 2025 is coming to England. Click here to buy tickets.

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Argentina v France | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Men's Match Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Women's Match Highlights

Tokyo Sungoliath vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Reds vs Force | Super Rugby W 2025 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
N
NH 180 days ago

In other words, we accept our coach is another loudmouth, Australian bully and wish to draw a line under the matter, sharpish... mate! Mate!

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Razor has an about turn on All Blacks eligibility rules

Yep, another problem!


I think he would have, in the instance I mentioned, which wasn’t changing anything other than correctly applying todays eligibility quidelines. Which is an arbitrary construct, as the deal likely would have played out completely differently, but I just ‘allowed’ him to have 1 year sabbatically for his ‘loyalty’, rather than having some arbitrary number like 70 caps required.


So if Richie had a 3 year deal, and the first year he was allowed to use him still, I don’t think he’d really not transition to Dmac being his main 10, as he’s obviously the only one he can use for the following two years, therefore likely his only real option for the WC (very hard for Richie to overtake him in such a short time). Richie would purely be a security net in a situation like I proposition where there are only small changes to the eligibility.


The system is not working well enough though, as we don’t have the Rugby Championship or World Cup trophies, do we? Well on that last question, that’s all I’m really saying but I would not believe a word this author says, so it’s entirely a ‘what if’ discussion, but if the author is right and now they are actually going to be more flexible, I think that’s great yeah. Ultimately thought I think those two players were an anomaly signing their contracts and futures up so far ahead, especially of when they were performing. Both jumped at the opportunity of good contracts when their All Black prospects weren’t looking that bright.

51 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ How the Gallagher Premiership has become rugby's go-to league for thrill seekers How the Gallagher Premiership has become rugby's go-to league for thrill seekers
Search