Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'It was crap' - nothing will make up for England's 2015 World Cup failure says Joe Marler

Joe Marler of England gathers the loose ball during the 2015 Rugby World Cup. (Photo by Paul Gilham/Getty Images)

Joe Marler insists that even a successful World Cup in Japan would fail to make up for the “crap” experience of 2015.

ADVERTISEMENT

England’s dismal group-stage exit four years ago was their worst performance in tournament history, resulting in the dismissal of Stuart Lancaster and appointment of Eddie Jones.

It would have been Marler’s last World Cup experience had he not reversed his decision to retire from international rugby in June, enabling him to secure a place in Jones’ squad.

“This isn’t unfinished business. If I’d not come back 2015 would still be the same,” the Harlequins prop said.

Continue reading below

Video Spacer

“I’d still feel the same about 2015 irrelevant of what happens at this World Cup. It’s completely different. 2015 was an experience – it was crap.

“That’s the mildest I think I’ve ever put it, but it happened. I’ll always have that.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B19z7fhgCZL/

“If we win this World Cup it won’t then be like I can forget about 2015 because that will still have happened. So it’s not for me to go ‘I need to right some wrongs’.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Those memories help in terms of experience talking to the other boys, but it’s also a hard one to relate to Japan.

“A home World Cup is just completely unique and I don’t think it will be anything like going away to Japan.”

Marler’s captain during that ill-fated campaign, Chris Robshaw, has tipped England to fare much better this time around telling The Guardian it is a two-horse race.

“I think it will be between England and South Africa,” he told The Guardian.

Having last played for England last June, Robshaw didn’t make Eddie Jones’ 31-man squad for this year’s tournament in Japan.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 33-year-old loose forward predicts that England and South Africa have enough quality throughout their squads to land the Webb Ellis Cup in November.

“Of course I hope England win it. It would be brilliant for the guys and amazing for the country.

“Seeing the buzz about the football, in both the men’s and women’s World Cup, and now the Ashes, you realise how sport galvanises the country like nothing else. This England side has the potential to do that.”

Rugby World Cup city guide – Fukuoka nightlife: 

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 17 minutes ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Gonzalo Quesada is driving the Azzurri revolution How Gonzalo Quesada is driving the Azzurri revolution
Search