Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Former Wallaby Vickerman dies aged 37

Former Wallaby Dan Vickerman

Former Australia, Brumbies and Waratahs lock Dan Vickerman has died at the age of 37.

ADVERTISEMENT

Vickerman played 63 Tests for the Wallabies, the last of which was the 2011 Rugby World Cup semi-final against New Zealand.

The South Africa-born lock died in Sydney overnight.

“The rugby world is in shock today after news of the tragic passing of Dan Vickerman,” Australian Rugby Union chief executive Bill Pulver said.

“Dan was an uncompromising competitor who forged a wonderful international rugby career despite a number of injury setbacks along the way.

“He was an enforcer on the field and a much-loved character off the field. He cared deeply about the game and the players, helping players transition into life after rugby in his role with RUPA [Rugby Union Players’ Association] following his retirement.

“Our thoughts and prayers are with Dan’s family at this extremely difficult time.”

Vickerman made his Super Rugby debut with Brumbies in 2001 before signing for Waratahs three years later.

In 2008, he left Australia for England to study at Cambridge University, before returning and re-joining Waratahs in 2011.

ADVERTISEMENT

He retired due to injuries a year later. He leaves behind a wife and two children.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT